Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 M.A. in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Art, University of Guilan. Rasht, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Art, University of Guilan. Rasht, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Merleau-Ponty’s theory, rooted in the embodied nature of human experience, suggests that when humans interact with others or their surroundings, they utilize their senses to form a coherent whole. This idea extends to the theory of multi-sensory perception of the environment by Pallasmaa. Therefore, the quality of the environment and the desire of people to be present in it, along with a set of other factors, is highly dependent on how it is perceived by humans. The success of spaces depends on the frequency of use and the sustained presence of people in that place. In the contemporary era, there is a noticeable decline in the presence of spaces, as indicated by various factors listed in recent research. It is necessary to know the criteria that create and promote presence in spaces, a presence that evokes the meaning and sense of place, in order to enrich the environment and the continuity of the event on an individual and collective scale. In this regard, the current research, relying on the theory of multisensory perception in architecture, tried to show that there is a positive relationship between the multisensory perception of spaces and their presence. At the same time, there is no doubt about the multi-sensory nature of the human perceptual mechanism in the process of interaction with the environment. However, there is not much information about the effect of these sensory perceptions, independently or in combination, on the user’s experience of the environment. The few research conducted in this framework indicate that the emphasis on the centrality of the sense of sight in the creation of spaces, mainly leads to the abandonment of other senses and a deficiency in the coherent sensory perception of the space, which itself, potentially, shows the possibility of reducing the presence of the space for the user.
Methods: In this framework, the current research attempts to answer the question of which sensory stimuli in the environment, whether alone or in combination with each other, contribute to making the environment more present for those who experience it. A test was conducted to quantify the impact of stimulating the senses separately and in combination with the pleasantness of the space as an index of its presence. The subject group comprised 20 volunteers aged between 20 and 35, exhibiting a symmetrical gender distribution, and possessing bachelor’s and higher education levels. Volunteers were placed in a singular architectural space, simulated for them through virtual reality arrangements. They experienced four sensory stimuli (sight, hearing, smell, touch) both separately and in combination. At the same time, the emotional reactions of their brains to these stimuli were extracted and recorded in the form of 6 quantitative indicators, which include engagement, excitement, focus, interest, relaxation and stress, using the Emotiv EPOC+ device and in the Emotiv BCI software environment. Also, the level of pleasantness of the space for them was also recorded, based on their self-report, in a 5-point Likert scale. The resulting data were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyzes and tests in terms of the possible correlation between sensory stimuli and the pleasantness of the space.
Findings: The findings of the research indicate that in indoor spaces, the presence of visual stimuli such as light, olfactory stimuli such as the smell of plants, and environmental tactile stimuli such as a gentle breeze have an observable effect on the pleasantness of the space and will make people more willing to stay in it. On the other hand, the research results have confidently demonstrated that auditory stimuli in the interior, particularly those with an unknown source and non-aesthetic sounds, are undesirable. However, non-passive vocal stimulation (with sounds of aesthetic quality) may have other results. Summarizing the findings makes it clear that in indoor spaces, the combination of visual, olfactory and tactile stimuli will increase the pleasantness of the space with a high degree of certainty. Also, with the aim of increasing the pleasantness of the space for the user, it is better to control tactile stimulation and minimize auditory stimulation - with an unknown source. 
Conclusion: It is necessary to know the factors that create and increase presence in spaces, a presence that evokes the meaning and sense of place, the degree of prosperity to the environment and continuity in individual and collective characteristics. In this regard, the current research, relying on the multi-sensory theory in architecture, tries to take a positive ratio of spaces and their presence. In general, the research findings suggest that enhancing assimilation in bodily perception and experience of space, such that spatial perceptions are not monosensory, visibly increases the pleasantness of the space. This is likely to contribute to the improvement of presence in the spaces.

Graphical Abstract

Role of multisensory experience in the presence of spaces using Neuroscience methods

Highlights

- This research, for the first time and in a focused manner, has examined the relationship between the components of multisensory perception and the pleasantness of the space.
- Field research has been done relying on computer technologies in neuroscience and virtual reality; The brain states of the user have been analyzed using the Emotiv EPOC+ device in relation to the sensory stimuli of the environment.
- The correlation between the parameters recorded by the Emotiv EPOC+ device and the subjects’ self-reports regarding the pleasantness of the space has been investigated.

Keywords

Main Subjects

این مقاله برگرفته از پایان‌نامه کارشناسی‌ارشد نویسنده نخست با عنوان «طراحی موزه‌ی بیماری‌های پاندمیک گیلان با رویکرد هم‌ساختی تجربه‌های حسی» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و مشاوره نویسنده سوم در دانشگاه گیلان انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s master thesis entitled “Guilan Pandemic Museum Design through harmony of senses”, supervised by the second author and advised by the third, at University of Guilan.

  1. Altman, Irwin, (2012), (translated by Ali Namazian), Environment and Social Behaviors: Solitude, Personal Space, Territory, Congestion, Tehran: Beheshti University Press. [In Persian]
  2. Abu Torabi, Seyedah Zahra & Azimi Hassanabadi, Alireza, (2017), Sensory Design in Architecture, Architecture Thought, second year, number 3, pages 112-97. [In Persian]
  3. Ahmadinejad, Fershteh, Bandarabad, Alireza, Piri, Saeed & Modiri, Atosa, (2019), prioritizing attention to indicators of the sense of place in Jamaran cultural tourism area using the model, housing and rural environment, number 172, pages 91-105. [In Persian]
  4. Ali-Tajer, Saeed, Saadati Waqar, Pouria, Bashir Robati, Mohammad & Heydari, Ahmed, (2019), the role of spatial configuration in informal settlements (case study: Hasar and Dizj neighborhoods of Hamedan), Urban Studies, number 27, pages 57-72. [In Persian]
  5. Aslanian, Yashar, Zabihi, Hossein, & Rahbari Manesh, Kamal, (2017), Determining the priority of senses in the perception of residents of residential complexes, a case study: residents of several residential complexes in Zanjan for more than two years, Architecture and Urban Planing, number 21, pages 37-23 .[In Persian]
  6. Bakhtiar Nasrabadi, Ameneh, Bakhtiar Nasrabadi, Hassan Ali and Bakhtiar Nasrabadi, Ahmad, (2019), an analysis of populist urban space and its relationship with citizenship behavior, Applied Sociology, twenty-second year, serial number (43), third issue, pages 101-114. [In Persian]
  7. Ba, Meihui & Kang, Jian, (2019), A laboratory study of the sound-odour interaction in urban environments, Elsevier,147, January 2019, Pages 314-326.
  8. Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., & Chatterjee, A. (2017). Buildings, Beauty, and the Brain: A Neuroscience of Architectural Experience. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(9), 1521–1531.
  9. Danesh, Jaber & Tayebi, Amir, (2019), quality of presence in urban squares with an emphasis on traditional examples of Iran, Iranian Islamic City, number 4, pages 71-80. [In Persian]
  10. Danshpour, Seyyed Abdulhadi & Charkhchian, Maryam (2008), public spaces and factors affecting collective life, Bagh-e Nazar, number 7, pages 19-28. [In Persian]
  11. De Pavia, Andrea & Jedon, Richard, (2019), Short- and long-term effects of architecture on the brain: Toward theoretical formalization, Higher Education Press, Frontiers of Architectural Research (2019) 8, 564-571.
  12. Elsadek, Mohamed, Liu, Binyi & Lian, zefeng, (2019), Green façades: Their contribution to stress recovery and well-being in highdensity cities, Elsevier, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 46 (2019) 126446.
  13. Ergan, Semiha, Shi, Zhuoya & Yu, Xinran, (2018), Towards quantifying human experience in the built environment: A crowdsourcing based experiment to identify influential architectural design features, Elsevier, 20, November 2018, Pages 51-59.
  14. Hafeznia, Mohammadreza, (2016), An Introduction to Research Methodology in Humanities, Tehran: Samt Press. [In Persian]
  15. Hall, Edward T. (2013), the hidden dimension, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
  16. Haqshanas, Sanaz, Mahmoudi Zarandi, Mahnaz & Khanlou, Nasim, (2019), design of rail transport stations in Tehran city based on the architecture of senses (case study: Tajrish metro stations, Valiasr Square and Mehrabad Airport), Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies, No. 32, pages 61-70. [In Persian]
  17. Holl, Steven, Pallasmaa, Johani, Perzgomez, Alberto, (1395), Questions of perception: phenomenology of architecture, Tehran: Fekr-e No Press. [In Persian]
  18. Koudelkova, Zuzana & Jasek, Roman, (2019), Capturing Brain Activity During Driving Automobile, Elsevier, Transportation Research Procedia 40 (2019) 1434–1440.
  19. Lang, Jan (2008), Creating architecture theory: the role of behavioral sciences in environmental design, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
  20. Lynch, Kevin, (1851), The image of the city, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
  21. Maarofi, Siamand and Bayzidi, Ghader, (2017), measuring the continuity of presence in the urban public space and the factors affecting it (case example: Mahabad City Family Park), Geography, Urban and Regional Studies, 8th year, no. 4, 254-237. [In Persian]
  22. Malgrave, Harry Francis, (2015), The architect’s brain, Neuroscience, Creativity and Architecture, Tehran: Honar-e Memari Press. [In Persian]
  23. Mansoori, Sima, Faizi, Mohsen, ashayeri, Hassan, (2017), New Discourse in Architecture; Based on neuro-psychology, Soffeh, No. 80, pages 25-40. [In Persian]
  24. Norberg Schultz, Christian, (2004), An excerpt from architecture: meaning and place, Tehran: Jan-e Jahan Press. [In Persian]
  25. Marleau-ponty, Maurice., (1964). The primacy of Perception, Illinois: Northwest University Press.
  26. Mohammadi, Mohammad & Ayatollahi, Mohammad Hossein, (2013), effective factors in improving the sociability of cultural buildings, a case study of Farshchian Cultural Center of Isfahan, Architecture and Urban Planing, No. 15, pages 79-95. [In Persian]
  27. Relf, Edward (2020), Place and placelessness, Tehran: Armanshahr Press. [In Persian]
  28. Sasaki, Tatsuya, Akimoto, Yoritaka & T. Nakahira, Katsuko, (2018), Pilot considerations of brain activity detection based on difference of English words difficulty levels at recognition of English words, Elsevier, Procedia Computer Science 126 (2018) 1046–1053.
  29. Pallasmaa, Johani, (2015), The eyes of skin, Architecture and Thr Senses, Tehran: Parham Naqsh Press.
  30. Pallasmaa, Johani, (2012), the thinking hand, of the existential and embodied wisdom in architecture, Tehran: Parham Naqash Press. [In Persian]
  31. Salehinia, Majid and Niromand Shishvan, Mahdieh, (2017), explaining the role of sensory landscape components based on the senses in the quality of environmental sensory perception of the passage of the new Tabriz citadel, Iranian Islamic City, 8th year, number 31, pages 31-19. [In Persian]
  32. Shirazi, Mohammadreza, (2012), The architecture of the senses and the subtle phenomenology of Johani Pallasmaa, Tehran: Rokhdad-e No Press. [In Persian]
  33. Samadi, Javad, Sattarzadeh, Dariush & Balilan, Lida, (2019), Qualitative assessment of sensory dimensions of space in historical markets from the perspective of users (case study: Qazvin market), Bagh-e Nazar, No. 16 (80), pages 15-30. [In Persian]
  34. Sohangir, Sara and Nasirsalami, Mohammadreza (2016), improving the design quality of architectural spaces by using functional mechanisms of the senses, Urban Management Studies, number 47, pages 493-504. [In Persian]
  35. Stach, Tomasz, Browarska, Natalia & Kawala-Janik, Aleksandra, (2018), Initial Study on Using Emotiv EPOC+ Neuroheadset as a Control Device for Picture Script-Based Communicators, Elsevier, IFAC PapersOnLine 51-6 (2018) 180–184.
  36. Torkashvand, Abbas, Ahmadian, Pari & Rashidi, Babak, (2014), Enhancing accessibility in urban public spaces based on the theory of placemaking, Proceedings of the First National Conference on Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz: Tabriz Islamic Arts University. [In Persian]
  37. Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Brorson, L., Leder, H., & Modroño, C. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture, Washington, DC: PNAS (Supplement 2) 10446-10453; first published June 10, 2013; 110.
  38. Yang, Wonyoung & Moon, Hyeun Jun, (2019), Combined effects of acoustic, thermal, and illumination conditions on the comfort of discrete senses and overall indoor environment, Elsevier, Building and Environment, 148 (2019) 623–633.