Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture, School of Architecture and Urban Design, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor, School of Architecture and Urban Design, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, School of Humanities, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Place identity is the symbolic-emotional aspect of belonging to a place, often associated with positive emotions. It reflects an individual’s emotional attachment to a place where they perceive it as integral to their identity. Studies related to place identity include different scales of human habitation from house to neighborhood and city. Among these, living in a house holds significant influence over human identity. The emotional connection fostered by the house can shape an individual’s sense of place identity. Since the provision of human ideals in various fields arouses positive emotions, paying attention to the ideals of place can also be considered as the basis for creating an emotional attachment. As the house represents a significant place, its essential components can be analyzed to understand the factors influencing place identity. Thus, this study aims to identify and explore the components that contribute to place identity within the context of the house. By viewing the house space as a “place” and recognizing the importance of emotional attachment, the research seeks to explain how each component influences an individual’s sense of place identity.
Methods: In this study, in order to investigate the effective components of place identity, based on the basic concepts and by reviewing the literature, a theoretical model has been developed and analyzed during various stages. So, in the first step, a measurement scale was developed to measure the hypothetical model, and its validity and reliability were evaluated using data from a cross-sectional survey, alongside confirmatory factor analysis. The participants of the research are residents of different residential of Ardabil urban fabric, including old fabrics (historical areas), newly built settlements and peripheral regions. Subsequently, the relationships proposed in the hypothetical model were examined through structural factor analysis to assess the model’s fit. In the final stage of the experimental process, the final structural model was formulated by eliminating non-significant relationships. The model’s fit indices were then evaluated, and the factors influencing place identity, along with their mode of influence, were determined based on the finalized model”.
Findings: In the final structural model, all relationships were found to be significant, with the chi-square ratio (78.011) to its degree of freedom (45) equating to 1.734. Additionally, the fit indices indicated a good fit for the model, with RMSEA at 0.050, GFI at 0.959, AGFI at 0.959, CFI at 0.982, NFI at 0.958, TLI at 0.973, and SRMR at 0.0489. These results collectively suggest the model’s suitability. Furthermore, the model explained 24% of the variance in place identity, with significant proportions of variance explained for various aspects of house conformity with ideals, including beauty (46%), facilities (41%), social status (39%), family relationships (38%), beliefs and values (29%), and spaciousness (12%). Also, according to the findings, “compliance with ideals in terms of family relationships” and “compliance with ideals in terms of social status” have direct and positive effects on the level of “place identity” respectively. The biggest indirect effect on the level of “place identity” are caused by the “compliance with ideals in terms of facilities”, and the “conformity to ideals in terms of Spaciousness” respectively. Also, the greatest effect on the level of “place identity” was attributed to the “compliance with ideals in terms of family relationships”, which was significantly influenced by the “compliance with ideals in terms of facilities” and through that, by “compliance with ideals in terms of spaciousness.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the analysis suggests that alignment between residents’ ideals and various aspects of the house’s physical structure, activities, and concepts (substantive components of the house) significantly impacts their place identity. Achieving satisfactory family relationships and favorable social status emerged as particularly influential factors. Improving these factors requires meeting residents’ ideals in terms of facilities, thereby enhancing functional satisfaction, which, in turn, is dependent on the house’s conformity with ideals regarding spaciousness”.

Graphical Abstract

Determining the factors affecting the enhancement of “place identity” in housing; Study case: Residential fabrics of Ardabil

Highlights

- The impact of the house’s compliance with the ideals in three areas of physical structure, activities and concepts  on improving the residents’ home identity. 
- The positive and direct impact of achieving satisfactory family relationships and favorable social status on improving the residents’ home identity.
- The positive and indirect effects of the house’s compliance with the ideals in the fields of facilities, spaciousness, beauty, beliefs and values and compliance with the experiences of the residents on improving the residents’ home identity.

Keywords

این مقاله برگرفته از رساله دکتری نویسنده نخست با عنوان «اصول طراحی کالبد با رویکرد ارتقای هویت مکانی (زمینه پژوهش: محله)» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و مشاوره نویسنده سوم در دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s doctoral thesis entitled “TIdentifying of influential factors contributing to place identity toward home and explaining of their effection process”, supervised by the second author and advised by the third, at Shahid  Rajaee Teacher Training University.

  1. Abedi, Mohammad Hossein and Abbasi, Sayedah Fatemeh. (2019). Investigating the concept of sense of place belonging in Iranian houses. Jurnal of Iranian and Islamic Architecture and Restoration Research, 2(2), 45-60.  [In Persian].-Aries, E., & Seider, M. (2007). The role of social class in the formation of identity: A study of public and elite private college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(2), 137-157.
  2. Boadu, K. (2002). Social class and health status in Ghana. Current sociology, 50(4), 531-553.
  3. Brown, G., and C. Raymond. (2007). The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Applied geography, 27(2), 89-111.
  4. Crasmareanu, M., and C. E. Hreţcanu. (2008). Golden differential geometry. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 38(5), 1229-1238.
  5. Cross, J. E. (2015). Processes of place attachment: An interactional framework. Symbolic Interaction, 38(4), 493-520.
  6. Cuba, L., and D. M. Hummon. (1993). A place to call home: Identification with dwelling, community and region. The Sociological Quarterly, 34,111-131.
  7. -Degnen, C. (2016). Socialising place attachment: place, social memory and embodied affordances. Ageing and Society, 36(8), 1645-1667.
  8. Durkheim, É., and F. Adloff. (2015). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Classiques Garnier.
  9. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1981). Cultural Traditions and Political Dynamics: The Origins and Modes of Ideological Politics. Hobhouse Memorial Lecture. The British Journal of Sociology, 32(2), 155-181.
  10. Ellison, C. G., D. A. Gay, and T. A. Glass. (1989). Does religious commitment contribute to individual life satisfaction. Social forces, 68(1), 100-123.
  11. Evans, G. W. 2006. Child development and the physical environment. Annu. Rev. Psychol, 57, 423-451.
  12. Farokhnezhad Afshar, P., Malakouti, S. K., Rashedi, V., & Ajri-khameslou, M. (2021). Relationship Between Place Attachment and Social Functioning in the Elderly. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 27(2), 194-203. [In Persian].
  13. Fornell, C., and D.F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39–50.
  14. Foye, C. (2017). The relationship between size of living space and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(2), 427-461.
  15. Franz, G., M., von der Heyde, and H. H. Bülthoff. (2004). Predicting experiential qualities of architecture by its spatial properties. In Proceedings of 18th IAPS-Conference (pp. 1-10).
  16. Frost, D., & Catney, G. (2020). Belonging and the intergenerational transmission of place identity: reflections on a British inner-city neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 57(14), 2833-2849.
  17. Guest, A. M., and B. A. Lee. (1983). Sentiment and evaluation as ecological variables. Sociological Perspectives, 26(2), 159-184.
  18. Hauge, A. L. (2007). Identity and place: a critical comparison of three identity theories. Architectural science review, 50(1), 44-51.
  19. Heidari, A. A., and S. Mirzaii. (2013). Place Identity and its informant parameters in Architectural studies. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 2(8), 260-268.
  20. Heidari, A. A., Motalebi, G., & Negintaji, F. (2014). Analysis of the physical sense of place in the traditional houses and modern residential apartments. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 19(3), 75-86. [In Persian]. 
  21. Hidalgo, M. C., and B. Hernandez. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(3), 273-281.
  22. Hinton, P. R., I. McMurray, and C. Brownlow. (2014). SPSS explained. Routledge. B. York, NY: Guilford Press.
  23. Hojjat, I., Mozaffar, F., & Saadati, P. (2017). Investigating home effective attributes in developing dwellers’ attachment.  {Presenting a causal process model}. Journal of Fine Arts – Architecture and Urban Development, 22(2), 51-62. [In Persian].
  24. Jaśkiewicz. M. 2015. Place attachment, place identity and aesthetic appraisal of urban  landscape, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46(4), 573–578.
  25. Karimimoshaver, M., & Nikookhooy, M. (2018). The Role of Physical Factors Affecting the Neighborhood Attachment Based on Perceived Residential Environment Quality’s Indicator, Case Study: Joolan Neighborhood in Hamedan. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 11(23), 75-84. [In Persian].
  26. Knez, I., Ode Sang, Å., Gunnarsson, B., & Hedblom, M. (2018). Wellbeing in urban greenery: the role of naturalness and place identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 491.
  27. Kyle, G.T., J.D. Absher, and A.R. Graefe. (2003). The moderating role of place attachment on the relationship between attitudes toward fees and spending preferences. Leis. Sci. no. 25, 33–50.-Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(8), 2207.
  28. Lemée, C., Fleury-Bahi, G., & Navarro, O. (2019). Impact of place identity, self-efficacy and anxiety state on the relationship between coastal flooding risk perception and the willingness to cope. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 499.
  29. Lewicka, M. (2010). What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(1), 35-51.
  30. Lv, Q., & Xie, X. (2017). Community involvement and place identity: the role of perceived values, perceived fairness, and subjective well-being. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 22(9), 951-964.
  31. Movahed, K. (2013). A study on the effects of Iranian religions on its house architecture. Center for the Study of Inf ormation and Religion, Kent State University.
  32. Norouzian-Maleki, S., & Omidi, N. (2020). Evaluation of The Impact of Physical-Social Factors on The Sense of Place In Residential Open Public Spaces. Hoviatshahr, 14(1), 87-98. [In Persian].
  33. Ogburn, W.F &  Nimkoff,  M.F. (2002). The field of sociology. Translation: Amirhossein Arianpour. Gastareh Publications, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian].
  34. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2010). Religiosity and life satisfaction across nations. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 13(2), 155-169.
  35. Ozdemir, A. (2010). The effect of window views openness and naturalness on the perception of rooms spaciousness and brightness: A visual preference study. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(16), 2275-2287.
  36. Paez, D. (2013). Social processes and collective memory: A cross-cultural approach to remembering political events. In Collective memory of political events (pp. 159-186). Psychology Press.
  37. Peng, J., Yan, S., Strijker, D., Wu, Q., Chen, W., & Ma, Z. (2020). The influence of place identity on perceptions of landscape change: Exploring evidence from rural land consolidation projects in Eastern China. Land Use Policy, 99, 104891.
  38. Pollner, M. (1989). Divine relations, social relations, and well-being. Journal of health and social behavior, 30(1), 92-104
  39. Porteous, J. D. (2013). Environmental aesthetics: Ideas, politics and planning.  Routledge.
  40. Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and behavior, 10(2), 147-169.
  41. Proshansky, H. M., A. K. Fabian, and R. Kaminoff. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of environmental psychology. no. 3, 57-83.
  42. Rahim, Z. A. (2015). The influence of culture and religion on visual privacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. no. 170, 537-544.
  43. Ramkissoon, H., L. D. G. Smith, and B. Weiler. (2013). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviors: A structural equation modelling approach. Tourism management. no. 36, 552-566.
  44. Rapoport, A. (1969). House Form and Culture, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
  45. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness (Vol. 1). Pion.
  46. Robinson, G. E., R. D. Fernald, and D. F.  Clayton. (2008). Genes and social behavior. Science, 322(5903), 896-900.
  47. Rollero, C., and N. De Piccoli, (2010). Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 198-205.
  48. Saegert, S. (1985). The role of housing in the experience of dwelling .In Home environments (pp. 287-309). Springer, Boston, MA.
  49. Santos, J. D. F., L. Vareiro, P. Remoaldo, and J. C. Ribeiro, (2014). The role of cultural mega events In the enhancement of city’s image attributes Differences Between Engaged AndAttendee Participants, The Clute Institute International Business and Education Conferences, San Francisco, USA 2014, 444-1 – 444-12.
  50. Schimmack, U., P. Radhakrishnan, S. Oishi, V. Dzokoto, and S. Ahadi. (2002). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(4), 582.
  51. Stedman, R. C. (2006). Understanding place attachment among second home owners. American behavioral scientist, 50(2), 187-205.
  52. Tatarkiewicz, W. (2012). A history of six ideas: An essay in aesthetics (Vol. 5). Springer Science and Business Media.
  53. Taylor, R. B., S. D. Gottfredson, and S. Brower. (1985). Attachment to place: Discriminant validity, and impacts of disorder and diversity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(5), 525-542.
  54. Thornock, C. M., L. J. Nelson, C. C. Robinson, and C. H. Hart. (2013). The direct and indirect effects of home clutter on parenting. Family relations, 62(5), 783-794.
  55. Thornock, C. M., L. J. Nelson, C. L. Porter, and C. A. Evans-Stout. (2019). There's no place like home: The associations between residential attributes and family functioning. Journal of Environmental Psychology. no. 64, 39-47.
  56. Turner, Jonathan. H. (2003). The Structure of Sociological Theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
  57. Twigger-Ross, C., M. Bonaiuto, and G. Breakwell. (2003). Identity theories and environmental psychology. na. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee and M. Bonaiuto (Eds.), Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues (pp. 203-233).Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
  58. Vaske, J. J., and K. C. Kobrin. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 16-21.
  59. Veitch, J. A., and A. D. Galasiu. (2012). The physiological and psychological effects of windows, daylight, and view at home: Review and research agenda. NRC-IRC Research Report RR-325.
  60. Walmsley, D. J. (1988). Urban living: The individual in the city. Longman Scientific and Technical.
  61. Watson, D., and A. Tellegen. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 219.
  62. Williams, D. R., and J. W. Roggenbuck. (1989).  Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. In NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research, San Antonio, TX (Vol. 9).
  63. Yee, E., S. Huffstetler, and S. L. Thompson-Schill. (2011). Function follows form: Activation of shape and function features during object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 348.