Document Type : Original Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad University(Mashhad Branch), Khorasan Razavi, Iran

Abstract

Currently, neighborhoods play an important role in local plans and programs in cities and have an important status in urban development. Urban neighborhoods are referred to as the key to urban development, public participation, and giving identity to urban environments. On the other hand, in Iranian urbanization also neighborhood has a very long history and it has been one of the main elements in the structure of Iranian cities.
One important issue in relation to neighborhood concept is the proper definition of the territory of neighborhoods. Many of the plans and programs provided for development, improvement, and enhancement of neighborhoods are somehow linked to the territory of neighborhoods and their definition. Meanwhile, the first step is to correctly define the dimensions and boundaries of neighborhoods and the role of neighborhood residents. In this regard, despite studies carried out in western countries and the development of methods to assess and analyze perceptions of residents of the territory, there have been very few studies in the country.
The present study aims to firstly determine the extent of collectiveness of residents’ perceptions of neighborhoods’ territory and secondly examine and analyze how the eight variables (derived from individual differences among neighborhood residents) affect residents’ perceptions of neighborhood territory. The considered variables are gender, age, education, job, duration of residence, type of ownership, mode of residence (native, non-native), and having neighborhood relations. First, the theoretical foundations associated with the study are reviewed and then the methods used to define neighborhood territory are introduced using residents’ opinions.
The research method is quantitative and survey along with statistical analysis and spatial information analysis. For this purpose, 600 combined questionnaires along with annex map were distributed in 6 neighborhoods of Mashhad according to the neighborhoods determined in Detailed Plan of the city of Mashhad (including neighborhoods of Sarshur, Sa’ad Abad, Samzghand, Touraj, Shahrbani Town and neighborhood 9 of Qasim Abad). Sampling method was multistage cluster sampling. The information analysis process was carried out in two stages. In the first stage, descriptive information of residents’ perception of the neighborhood was analyzed and in the second stage, the information obtained from cognitive maps of residents from the territory of the neighborhood was analyzed using Geographic Information System (GIS).
The study results show that the majority of respondents try to define their place of residence in the framework of a neighborhood territory. Regarding the variables of neighborhood name and location of the neighborhood center, in most neighborhoods, there is disagreement among the residents. Meanwhile, local centers and neighborhood mosques play an important role in residents’ perceptions of neighborhood territory.
Analysis of the information regarding the neighborhood’s perceived territory shows that in all neighborhoods, the average perceived territory area of the neighborhood is lower than the contracted neighborhood area in the Detailed Plan. Overlap rates in the studied neighborhoods were reported as ranging between 10 to 70 percent among residents.
The results of examining common points in neighborhood borders show that in most neighborhoods the boundaries of the contracted neighborhood territory in the Detailed Plan in four geographical directions are different from the neighborhood borders perceived by the residents. Also, in the respondents’ answers, the location of the common area territory in each of the neighborhoods is mostly based on the activity centers within the neighborhoods.
Results of Kruskal-Wallis statistical test show that residents’ perceptions of neighborhoods’ territories in different urban contexts are different from the contracted neighborhoods defined in urban development plans. Also, the average perceived territory areas in different urban contexts are significantly different from each other.
To examine the variables of individual differences of residents and how they affect the residents’ perceptions, the mean area index of residents’ perceptions of the neighborhood territory was used. Mann-Whitney statistical test was used to analyze the three variables of gender, type of ownership, and type of residence; and Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the five variables of education, age, duration of residence, type of occupation, and the number of neighborhood relations. The results show that males and owners of residential units significantly perceive the neighborhood territory larger than the other groups, and residents who are housewives and students, compared to other groups of occupations, significantly perceive the neighborhood territory smaller than the other groups of employees. Regarding the variables of age, duration of residence, level of education, and the amount of neighborhood relations, there were no significant differences in residents’ perceptions of neighborhood territory.
The present study provides recommendations on application of residents’ perceptions in the process of defining neighborhoods’ territories and determining variables in this regard. Also, it is recommended to use new tools such as Geographic Information System (GIS) and its analytical tools in the process of determining neighborhoods’ territories.
 

Keywords

-      اشرف، احمد (1353). ویژگی های شهرنشینی در ایران دوره اسلامی، نامه علوم انسانی، شماره 4، دوره اول.
-    برنون، وحید؛ ناصر براتی؛ آزاده شاهچراغی (1395). تعریف قلمرو محلات: تحلیلی مفهومی با تاکید بر ابعاد روانی- ادراکی و ارائه مدل مفهومی، مدیریت شهری، 42،326-313.
-      توسلی، محمود (1376). اصول و روشهای طراحی شهری و فضاهای مسکونی در ایران جلد اول،چاپ چهارم، تهران، مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات شهرسازی و معماری ایران.
-      ثقه الاسلامی، عمید الاسلام؛ امین زاده، بهناز (1388). رویکردی تحلیلی به شناخت مفهوم محله در شهرهای معاصر ایران، مجله هنرهای زیبا، 39، 92-81.
-      حافظ نیا، محمدرضا (1387). مقدمه ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی، تهران، سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی (سمت).
-      حبیبی، سید محسن (1380). از شار تا شهر (تحلیلی تاریخی از مفهوم شهر و سیمای کالبدی آن، تفکر و تاثر)، چاپ سوم، تهران، دانشگاه تهران.
-      دواس،دی.ای (1383). پیمایش در تحقیقات اجتماعی، ترجمه هوشنگ نایبی، تهران، نشر نی.
-      زیاری، کرامت‌اله (1384). برنامه ریزی کاربری اراضی شهری،چاپ دوم، یزد، دانشگاه یزد.
-      سلطان‌زاده، حسین (1367). مقدمه ای بر تاریخ شهر و شهرنشینی در ایران، چاپ دوم، امیر کبیر، تهران.
-      سلطان زاده، حسین (1368). محله‌ها و واحدهای مسکونی در ایران، در شهرهای ایران،جلد سوم، به کوشش محمد یوسف کیانی، تهران، جهاد دانشگاهی.
-      سعید نیا، احمد (1385). کتاب سبز راهنمای شهرداری‌ها (نظام مراکز شهری و فضاهای مسکونی)، چاپ دوم، تهران، سازمان شهرداریهای کشور.
-      شیعه، اسماعیل (1382). مقدمه ای بر برنامه ریزی شهری،چاپ سیزدهم، تهران، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران.
-      فلامکی، محمد منصور (1374). باز زنده سازی بناها و شهرهای تاریخی،چاپ سوم، تهران، دانشگاه تهران.
-      مرکز آمار ایران (1395). آمار بلوک‌های جمعیتی شهر مشهد.
-      Campbell E, Henly JR, Elliott DS, Irwin K (2009). Subjective constructions of neighborhood boundaries: lessons from a qualitative study of four neighborhoods, Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 461-490.
-      Chaskin RJ (1995). Defining neighborhood: history, theory and practice, The chapin Hall center for children at the university of Chicago, Chicago.
-      Coulton C, Korbin J, Chan T, Su M (2001). Mapping residents' perception of neighborhood boundaries: A methodological note, American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 371-383.
-      Coulton C (2012). Defining Neighborhoods for Research and Policy, Cityscape, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 231-234.
-      Downs RM, Stea D (1973). Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: Process and Products. In R. M. Downs and D. Stea(Eds.), Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior , pp. 8-26, Chicago , Aldine Transation.
-      Guest AM, Lee BA (1984). How urbanites define their neighborhoods, Population and Environment, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 32-56.
-      Haeberle SH (1988). People or place: Variations in community leaders’ subjective definition of neighborhood, Urban Affairs Quaterly.
-      Haney WG, Knowles EC (1978). Perception of Neighborhood by city and suburban residents, Human Ecology, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 201-214.
-      Hester RT (1984). Planning Neighborhood Space with People, University of California, Berkeley.
-      Hunter A (1974). Symbolic Communities: The persistence and change of Chicago ‘s local communities: Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
-      Keller S (1968). The urban neighborhood: A sociological perspective, New York: Random House.
-      Kitchin R (1994). Cognitive Maps: What are they and why study them? Environmental Pshycology,Vol. 14, pp. 1-19.
-      Lee T (1968). Urban neighborhood as a socio-spatial schema, Human Relations, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 241-267.
-      Lee T (1973). Psychology and living space, In R.M. Downs & Stea (Eds.), Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior, pp. 87-108, Chicago: Aldine.
-      Lee BA, Campbell KE (1997). Common Ground? Urban neighborhoods as survey respondents see them, Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 922-936.
-      Lee T (1968). Urban neighborhood as a socio-spatial schema, Human Relations, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 241-267.
-      Lohmann A, McMurran G (2009). Resident-Defined neighborhood Mapping Using GIS to Analayze Phenomenological Neighborhoods, Joutnal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 66-81.
-      Mumford L (1961). The city in history; its origins, its transformations, and its prospects, Fine Communication.
-      Ohmer ML, Coulton C, Freedman D, Sobeck JL, Booth J (2018). Methodological approaches, Measures for community and neighborhood researches, Sage Pub Inc.
-      Rapoport A (2001). The role of neighborhoods in the success of cities, paper presented at the WSE, symposium “Defining success of the city in the 21 century”, Berlin.
-      Rohe WM (2009). From local to global, one hundred years of neighborhood planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 209-230.
-      Smith ME (2010). The archaeological study of neighborhoods and districts in ancient cities, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 137-154.
-      Urban Task Force (1999). Towards an Urban Renaissance, Final Report, HMSO, London.