انجمن علمی معماری و شهرسازی ایران معماری و شهرسازی ایران(JIAU) 2228-589X 16 1 2025 08 23 Explaining the Process of Using Monographic Method in Iranian Architectural Studies تبیین فرآیند بهره‌گیری از روش تک‌نگاری در مطالعات معماری ایران 103 118 247730 10.30475/isau.2025.448216.2142 FA حجت‌اله عبدی اردکانی استادیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران. 0000-0002-2016-0023 سیده یاسمن ده بزرگی کارشناس‌ارشد مطالعات معماری ایران، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران. 0009-0000-5519-3178 Journal Article 2024 03 12 Extended Abstract Background and Objectives: Monographs in the field of architecture have garnered increasing attention from researchers over the past few decades, finding expression in their scholarly articles. These types of studies contribute to the recognition, documentation, and recording of structures that, due to remaining obscure, are vulnerable to damage and potential destruction. Monographs play a vital role in preserving this architectural heritage by bringing attention to these overlooked structures, providing detailed analyses of their historical, cultural, and architectural significance. Despite the acknowledged significance of monographs in the field of architecture, there is currently a lack of a unified, comprehensive framework to guide the writing of such articles. Moreover, the lack of a clear set of guidelines can be particularly challenging for emerging researchers and students who seek to contribute to the body of knowledge on architectural monographs. A comprehensive guide would provide a roadmap for conducting rigorous and impactful research, ensuring that monographs meet the highest standards of scholarly inquiry. The primary objective of this research is therefore to provide a comprehensive guide with pre-determined steps for conducting such research. This guide aims to standardize the process of writing architectural monographs, ensuring consistency and rigor across different studies. By providing a clear framework for research, analysis, and documentation, this guide will empower researchers to produce high-quality monographs that contribute significantly to the preservation and understanding of architectural heritage. Methods: To achieve the objective of creating a comprehensive guide for writing architectural monographs, the research methodology was designed to be both systematic and rigorous. The research was conducted in two main phases: a preliminary review of existing monographs and a qualitative content analysis of a selected sample of articles. The first phase involved reviewing early examples of monographs to explore the origins of this subject in Iran and around the world. This initial review served to provide a historical context for the study, tracing the evolution of monograph writing and identifying key milestones in the development of the field. By examining the early works, it was possible to gain insights into the motivations, approaches, and challenges faced by pioneers in architectural documentation. The second phase involved a qualitative content analysis of 50 articles related to the field of architectural monographs published over the past 75 years. The selection of articles was based on their relevance to the research topic, their representation of different architectural styles and periods, and their availability. The articles were carefully chosen to ensure a diverse range of perspectives and approaches to monograph writing. The qualitative content analysis method was chosen to extract meaningful concepts and themes from the selected articles. This method allows for a deep understanding of the content, going beyond simple quantitative measures to explore the underlying meanings and relationships within the text. Each article was systematically analyzed to identify key concepts, themes, and methodological approaches used by the authors. Findings: The research findings reveal a clear structure in the creation of architectural monographs, which is categorized into three primary stages: Identification, Historiography, and Architecture. Identification: This initial stage involves the selection and direct observation of the building through field visits, as well as indirect observation through images and existing plans. The importance of this stage lies in the ability to personally experience the building and capture its essence through various visual media. Historiography: The second stage focuses on the historical background and geographical location of the area where the building is situated, the time of its construction, its evolution over time, the builder and patrons, and the reasons for its name. This stage relies on sources such as geographical atlases, inscriptions, historical texts, travelogues, poems, and other relevant documents. Architecture: The final stage involves the architectural description of the building, detailing spatial elements, its apparent form, structure and construction methods, materials, and decorations. This stage requires a deep understanding of architectural principles and the ability to communicate complex ideas in a clear and concise manner. Conclusion: This research has provided a comprehensive guide for writing architectural monographs, detailing the essential stages and methods required to produce high-quality, impactful research. By providing a clear and standardized framework, this guide aims to promote consistency and rigor in architectural monograph writing, ultimately contributing to the preservation and understanding of architectural heritage. The findings emphasize the importance of each stage in the monograph process, from identification to historiography and architecture, providing a roadmap for researchers to follow. In conclusion, this research contributes to the field of architectural studies by providing a valuable resource for researchers, students, and professionals, ultimately advancing the understanding and preservation of architectural heritage. تک‌نگاری در حوزه معماری، موضوعی است که طی چند دهه گذشته کم و بیش مورد توجه محققین مختلف قرار گرفته و در مقالات آنان نمود پیدا کرده ‌است. این قبیل از پژوهش‌ها موجب معرفی، ثبت و مستند‌نگاری ابنیه‌ای شده که به علت ناشناخته ماندن، در معرض آسیب‌ قرار گرفته‌ و در حال تخریب بوده‌اند. علی‌رغم اهمیت تک‌نگاری در زمینه‌ی معماری، تاکنون یک طرح جامع به عنوان یک مرجع برای نگارش این دست از مقالات تهیه نشده و افراد مختلف به شیوه‌هایی متنوع به نگارش چنین مقالاتی پرداخته‌اند. بنابراین هدف اصلی در پژوهش حاضر، ارائه‌ی راهنمایی جامع با مراحل از پیش تعیین شده به منظور انجام این قبیل از پژوهش‌ها است. بدین منظور در ابتدا تلاش شده تا با مرور نمونه‌های اولیه‌ی تک‌نگاری به ریشه‌های شکل‌گیری چنین موضوعی در ایران و جهان پرداخته شود. در ادامه نیز با استناد به روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی به بررسی متن 50 مقاله مربوط به 75 سال گذشته در این حوزه پرداخته و مفاهیم قابل استخراج از هرکدام مشخص شده ‌است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که این مفاهیم به صورت زیرمجموعه‌‌های یک مقوله‌ی کلی درآمده و این مقولات مراحل تک‌نگاری را روشن ساخته‌اند. این مراحل عبارتند از شناسایی، تاریخ‌‌نگاری و معماری. در مرحله‌ی شناسایی به انتخاب و مشاهده‌ی بنا به صورت مستقیم (بازدید میدانی) و غیرمستقیم (مشاهده تصاویر و طرح‌های موجود از بنا) پرداخته‌ شده ‌است. در مرحله‌ی دوم پیشینه تاریخی و موقعیت جغرافیایی منطقه‌ای که بنا در آن واقع شده، زمان ساخت بنا و سیر تحولات آن از ابتدا تاکنون، سازنده و بانیان بنا و علت نام‌گذاری آن با استناد به منابعی نظیر اطلس‌های جغرافیایی، کتیبه‌های موجود، متون تاریخی، سفرنامه‌ها، اشعار و ...، مشخص شده‌اند. در مرحله‌ی پایانی نیز به توصیف معمارانه بنا پرداخته‌شده و عناصر فضایی، فرم ظاهری، سازه و شیوه‌های اجرای بنا، مصالح و تزیینات به کار رفته در آن مشخص شده‌اند.

https://www.isau.ir/article_247730_d5ed6ec6a8ad15860609d9529a9837f2.pdf