نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 پژوهشگر دکتری معماری، گروه معماری، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران.

2 استاد مدعو، گروه معماری، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران. دانشیار، دانشکده معماری، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، مرکز تحقیقات افق‌های نوین در معماری و شهرسازی، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران.

چکیده

گرچه امروزه مدل‌سازی اطلاعات ساختمان و آموزش آن از موضوعات مهم و رو به رشدی در عناوین پژوهش­های اخیر در جهان به شمار می­رود، اما این جریان نوین بخصوص آموزش آن درکشور ایران نادیده گرفته شده است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف پیشنهاد چارچوب مفهومی جهت شناخت بکارگیری سیستم مدل‌سازی اطلاعات ساختمان درآموزش معماری ایران انجام یافته است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی بوده و رویکردی آمیخته؛ شامل نمونه موردی ثانویه، پیمایش و گروه کانونی دارد. انتخاب جامعة آماری به روش هدفمند بوده و حجم نمونه تعداد 200 نفر دانش­آموختة معماری است. خطای اندازه گیری 05/0 و سطح اطمینان 95 درصد، بوده است. پرسشنامه‌ها بصورت آنلاین پخش و با استفاده از نرم­افزار آماری (اس.پی.اس.اس) تحلیل شده­اند. روایی پرسشنامه­ها ارزیابی و پایایی متغیرها از طریق آزمون آلفای کرونباخ با ضریب 876/0محاسبه و تایید شده است. ابتدا با استفاده از نمونه­های موردی چارچوب نظری پژوهش ترسیم وسپس نظرات مشارکت کنندگان اخذ و تحلیل گردیده و در انتها چارچوب نهایی توسط گروه کانونی از اساتید و خبرگان اعتبار سنجی گشته است. سطح  و اهداف دوره با توجه به نتایج آزمون کای اسکوئر چنین بدست آمد که سیستم مدل‌سازی اطلاعات ساختمان می‌تواند در مقاطع مختلف و به همراه سایر کلاس‌های آموزشی بکار رود. همچنین از آزمون­های t یک نمونه­ای و رتبه‌بندی فریدمن جهت انتخاب محتوا و اهمیت دوره­ها استفاده شده که بیشترین میزان اهمیت کاربرد سیستم مدل‌سازی اطلاعات ساختمان در مدیریت پروژه، مباحث پایداری و کارگاه طراحی معماری و کمترین میزان اهمیت کاربرد آن در حوزة مفاهیم و تصورات ذهنی بدست آمده است. براساس یافته­ها، سه حوزة نرم افزار و مدل­سازی؛ مفاهیم و تئوری؛ و مدیریت اطلاعات؛ در چارچوب آموزشی سیستم مدل‌سازی اطلاعات ساختمان موثر شناخته شده و به عنوان نمونه برنامه درسی دورة کارشناسی معماری مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است و الگوی آموزشی نهایی به صورت تلفیقی در مقاطع مختلف تحصیلی پیشنهاد شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Recognition and Feasibility Study of Implementing Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Architectural Education in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Marjan Latifi Oskouie 1
  • Seyed Amir Saeid Mahmoodi 2
  • Elham Nazemi 3

1 Ph. D Candidate in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.

2 Adjunct Professor, Department of Architecture, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran. Associate Professor, School of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Advancement in Architecture and Urban Planning Research Center,Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
The Building Information Modeling (BIM) system is one of the most important breakthroughs in the construction industry of the current era, and has the potential to transform traditional architectural education into a more productive model. The construction industry is considered to be one of the largest industries in the world, playing a major role in the development of countries around the globe. In fact, the impact of this industry is such that its recession can cause a recession in the whole economy of any country, while its prosperity can pave the way for prosperity of the whole economy of the country. Today, with the development of science and technology, the construction industry is facing new avenues, bringing about major changes therein, one of which is the BIM system. Consequently, with the development of technology in this field, higher education, which always seeks to keep pace with the industry, has confronted the challenge of accepting modern technologies and thus shapes more effective educational strategies. Although Building Information Modeling and its training courses are among the most important and sought-after subjects in recent research literature in the world by leading countries, this new modeling, and especially its training, has been widely neglected in Iran. The purpose of this study is to propose a conceptual framework for getting familiarized with the exploitation of building information modeling system in teaching Iranian architecture. In terms of purpose, this study is an applied research which employs a mixed approach including secondary case study, survey and focus group. The selection of the statistical population was undertaken purposefully, as each component of this statistical population was selected based on its relative knowledge of the building information modeling system and the sample is consisted of 200 architectural graduates. The measurement error was set at 0.05 and the level of reliability was 95%. The questionnaires were distributed online and analyzed using SPSS. The validity of the questionnaires was assessed and the reliability of the variables was calculated and confirmed by Cronbach's alpha test with a coefficient of 0.876. First, the theoretical framework of the research was devised using previous case studies and then the opinions of participants were obtained and analyzed. Finally, the final framework was validated by a focal group of professors and experts. According to the results of the Chi-Square test, the level and objectives of the course were evaluated to be such that the BIM system could be used at different educational levels and along with other training classes. Friedman test and one-sample t-tests and were also used to select the content and measure importance of the courses, in which the highest significance of the application of building information modeling was witnessed in project management, sustainability issues and architectural Studio, while the lowest significance of its application was obtained in the field of concepts and mental imagination. Based on the findings, three areas of software and modeling, concepts and theory, and information management recognized as effective in the educational framework of BIM, and were thus recommended for consideration in the curriculum of the undergraduate course in architecture. The final educational model is proposed in combination at different educational levels. As such, the proposed framework for teaching building information modeling system is divided into three courses of elementary, intermediate and advanced, in which the students first learn the individual skills in modeling and analysis in the bachelor's program of architecture, then they learn the concepts and principles of building information modeling in the master's program course. They can finally take part in advanced training courses related to the building industry and profession based on teaching teamwork and interdisciplinary collaboration and integration in real projects.
The results indicate that the educational objectives of the BIM system should incorporate the principles of cooperation and integration, as the ultimate goal of implementing a building information modeling system is generating integrated knowledge. The building information modeling system can be taught as an independent course or in combination with other courses such as architectural design Studios. Therefore, recognizing the content of the course and the different fields of technology, policy and processes, measuring the capabilities assigned to learners in the field of technology, which is associated with gaining elementary knowledge in software, hardware, shared platforms, and technological equipment and expertise in modeling, project delivery and presentation techniques, requires an efficient and practical method, for which using BIM system and testing concepts and practical principles is recommended. On the other hand, regarding the subjects in the field of building information modeling processes, i.e. management skills, which reveals the degree of familiarity with the principles and rules for decision-making, and also measures and evaluates the scope of policies, i.e. the legal capabilities, in which the theoretical and standard skills of learners are considered, and finally regarding the theoretical and analytical nature of these fields, oral presentation, conference and interview methods are recommended. In the intermediate courses, this can lead to joint projects of architecture, structures, and facilities for the application of cooperation, and in advanced courses, it can lead to the presence and cooperation of learners in real projects and integration. Therefore, given the opportunities and benefits that building information modeling offers to the field of architecture and construction education, there is an urgent need for education, promotion, legislation and creating proper infrastructure in the field of building information modeling and its purposeful, optimal and principled use of such up-to-date construction system with the aim of improving the quality and executive level of the construction industry in Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Building Information Modeling
  • Architectural education
  • Conceptual Framework
  • BIM Training in Iran
باستانی, مهیار, و سیدامیرسعید محمودی. 1397. “روش های خلق ایده و کانسپت در فرآیند طراحی معماری.” نشریة هنرهای زیبا 23 (1): 5-18.
نیک بخت. 1394. بررسی آموزش مدل سازی اطلاعات ساختمان (BIM) در برنامه تحصیلی رشته مدیریت ساخت در دانشگاه های ایران. پایان نامه در رشته مدیریت ساخت دانشگاه آزاداسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات.
Abdirad, H., & Dossick, C. (2016). BIM curriculum design in architecture, engineering, and construction education: a systematic review. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 21(17), 250-271.
Alwan, Z., Jones, P., & Holgate, P. (2017). Strategic sustainable development in the UK construction industry, through the Framework of Strategic Sustainable Development, using Building Information Modelling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(1), 349-358. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.085
Autodesk. (2018). INSIGHT BLOG. Retrieved 2019, from https://blogs.autodesk.com/insight/solar-analysis-plugin-now-available-for-revit/
BIMForum. (2018). Retrieved from BIMForum.org: <http://www.bimforum.org/>
Cheng, R. (2006). Suggestions for an integrative education. The American Institute of Architects. Washington DC: Report on integrated practice.
Clayton, M. (2006). Replacing the 1950’s curriculum. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture, (pp. 48-52). Louisville, KY.
CPIC. (2011). Building Information Modelling, , Drawing is Dead- Long Live Modelling. Retrieved from http://www.cpic.org.uk/en/bim/buildinginformation-modelling.cfm
De Masi, A. (2015). From knowledge to complex representation interpretation of material systems, survey guidelines and reading criteria, multi-representations of 3D city models for Cultural Heritage. 2015 Digital Heritage.
Della Porta, D. (2008). "Comparative Analysis: Case-oriented versus variable-oriented research" in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences A Pluralist Perspectives edited by, Donatella Della Porta and Michael, Keatng. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Denzer, A., & Hedges, K. (2008). From CAD to BIM: Educational Strategies for the Coming Paradigm Shift. Architectural Engineering Conference (AEI), (pp. 1-11).
Eastman, C. (2008). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2011). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. John Wiley and Sons.
Hadzaman, N., Takim, R., & Nawawi, A. (2015). BIM roadmap strategic implementation plan: Lesson learnt from Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong. Raidén, A Band Aboagye-Nimo, E (Eds) Procs 31stAnnual ARCOM Conference (pp. 611-620). Lincoln, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Isikdag, U., & Underwood, J. (2010). A Synopsis of the Handbook of Research on Building Information Modeling. Proceedings of CIB 2010 World Building Congress. Salford.
Khemlani, L. (2007). AIA TAP 2007 Conference. AECBytes. Retrieved from www.aecbytes.com/newsletter/2007/issue_31.html
Kushwaha, V. (2015). Contribution of building information modelling (BIM) to solve problems in architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry and addressing barriers to implementation of BIM. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 3(1), 100-105.
Kymmell, W. (2008). Building Information Modelling : Planning and Managing Construction Project with 4D CAD and simulation. United State of America: Mc Graw Hill.
Logothetis, S., & Stylianidis, E. (2016). BIM Open Source Software (OSS) for the documentation of cultural heritage. Virtual Archaeol, 7, 28–35.
MacLeamy, P. (2004). Collaboration, integrated information and the project lifecycle in building design, construction and operation. Retrieved from http://codebim.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/CurtCollaboration.pdf
Puolitaival, T., & Forsythe, P. (2016). Practical challenges of BIM education. Structural Survey, 34(4/5), 351-366.
Puolitaival, T., & Kestle, L. (2018). Teaching and learning in AEC education – the building information modelling factor. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 23, 195-214. Retrieved from http://www.itcon.org/2018/10
RIBA. (2011). CPD Northern Network, ‘Building Information Modelling and the Future. Retrieved from http://www.architecture.com/Files/RIBAProfessionalServices/Regions/NorthEast/Events/.pdf
Smith, D., & Tardif, M. (2009). Building information modeling: A strategic implementation guide for architects, engineers, constructors, and real estate asset managers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Smith, P. (2014). BIM Implementation – Global Strategies. Procedia Engineering, 85, 482 – 492.
Waterhouse, R., & Philp, D. (2016). National BIM Report 2017. United Kingdom: National BIM Library.