نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری معماری، گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی. تهران. ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی. تهران. ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد دماوند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

آتلیه‌ها در دانشکده‌های معماری به مثابه ابزار اصلی آموزش می‌باشند که در آن دانشجویان در معرض حل دسته‌ای از مسئله‌های طراحی قرار می‌گیرند. از آنجا که فرسودگی تحصیلی موجب می‌شود فرایند یادگیری روندی نزولی طی کند، کاهش آن مورد توجه محیط‌های آکادمیک خواهد بود. علاوه بر این شیوه‌های آموزشی، از جمله بازی‌وارسازی بررسی و به‌روز شده و طی سالیان و با اهداف مختلف استفاده شده است. هدف از اجرای این پژوهش بررسی اثربخشی آموزش بازی‌وار طراحی معماری در مقطع تحصیلی کارشناسی، بر کاهش میزان فرسودگی تحصیلی دانشجویان و در نتیجه ارتقا فرایند یادگیری طراحی است. پژوهش حاضر به شیوه‌ی آزمایشی و با طرح پیش‌آزمون-پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل اجرا شد. جامعه‌ی آماری این پژوهش دانشجویان طرح 4 معماری دانشگاه آزاد واحد پرند بودند که شصت نفر از آن‌ها به صورت تصادفی برای شرکت در این پژوهش انتخاب شدند و در دو گروه مداخله و کنترل قرار گرفتند. جهت گردآوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه استاندارد فرسودگی تحصیلی(MBI-GS(S برای آنالیز آماری داده‌ها، از نرم افزار SPSS.22 استفاده شد. بر اساس یافته‌های این پژوهش می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که آموزش بازی‌وار در طراحی معماری در کاهش فرسودگی تحصیلی مؤثر بوده است، لذا استفاده از این شیوه‌ به منظور کاهش فرسودگی تحصیلی و بهبود یادگیری طراحی دانشجویان معماری پیشنهاد می‌گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effectiveness of Gamification Education on Architectural Students' Academic Burnout and its Role in the Learning Process of Design

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mozhgan Raoufrahimi 1
  • Shadi Azizi 2
  • Mehrdad Javidinejad 2
  • Amir Sadeghi 3

1 Ph.D Candidate in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language Teaching, Faculty of Humanities, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Architecture education has always been associated with two different and complementary processes: creative thinking and linear / technical thinking. Today, the process of training an architect in an academic environment is usually based on design studios, which is complemented by formal training in theoretical and technical topics. This system is based on the idea that it will enable students to come up with creative and appropriate solutions. However, this teaching method will might have hidden problems that in some cases can hinder the progress of architecture students and cause their full potential to not be identified and exploited. Ateliers (workshops) in architecture schools are the main teaching tools in which students are exposed to solving a bunch of design problems. Because burnout causes the learning process to decline, its reduction is of interest to many academic settings. Burnout is one of the problems of the educational system in all levels of education, which causes wastage of manpower and expenses and can have a devastating effect on personal and academic life. In addition, new and various educational methods, including gamification, have been reviewed and improved and used over the years and for various purposes, educational games (serious games) that are not just entertainment and necessarily in order to achieve educational goals and values ​​and to design skills. Games are fun ways to learn and provide a safe and secure environment in a simulated environment for learners to make decisions and even make mistakes without fear of real-world consequences. Games can confront the player with a variety of challenges that conform to the latest proven principles of learning effectiveness. Learning through educational games is unconscious, indirect and effective. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of architecturr design education at the undergraduate level, on reducing the rate of student academic burnout and thus improving the learning process of design, as the main course in architecture. This method aims to maximize students' capacity to acquire information and skills; The integration of their creative and technical competencies has been done in order to improve the effectiveness of architectural education and increase the quality of work of future architects. This study was conducted experimentally with a pretest-posttest design with a control group and an intervention group. The statistical population of this study was the students of Parand Branch Azad University, who were randomly selected to participate in this research and were divided into two groups of intervention and control, with equal numbers. MBI-GS (S) standard burnout questionnaire was used to collect data and SPSS.22 software was used for statistical analysis of data. The games were designed in accordance with the chapter and in order to achieve the objectives of the research and were performed in the studio of the intervention group. Student feedback was recorded at each levels of the games and at the end of the semester, very interesting results in terms of student design quality, increased motivation and interest in them; As well as the promotion of design learning was achieved. Statistical results show that there is a big difference between the three conceptual sections of academic burnout including exhaustion (feeling tired because of study requirements), cynicism (having a pessimistic and apathetic attitude towards homework) and professional efficacy (feeling incompetent as a student); There is an intervention and control group among the students, after completing the training sessions and holding a post-test. Therefore, the study of academic burnout and coping strategies to reduce it, in order to achieve educational goals and improve the design learning process was the criterion of this study and in contrast to other previous studies that examined the result of gamification in the product of architecture and design. Or studied the purely psychological effects of burnout; Considering the concepts of gamification education and academic burnout, the design learning process was examined and by considering its elements, the method of gamification education of architectural design was tested in line with reducing students' academic burnout. Based on the findings of this study, it can be concluded that gamification education in architectural design has been effective in reducing academic burnout, increasing interest and motivation, as well as the level of student participation in practical activities of the studio. Therefore, it is recommended to use this new educational method in order to reduce academic burnout and improve the learning of architectural design.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Gamification Education
  • Design
  • Architecture
  • Academic burnout

حجت، عیسی (1393) سنت و بدعت در آموزش معماری، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، چاپ دوم.

نعامی، عبدالزهرا (1388) "رابطه بین کیفیت تجارب یادگیری با فرسودگی تحصیلی دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز"، فصلنامه مطالعات روانشناختی، جلد 5، شماره 3، صفحات 117-134.

Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2013). Improving participation and learning with gamification. In L. Nacke, K. Harrigan, & N. Randall (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications, 10-17.

Bennour, M. & Vonèche, J.J. (2009). The Historical Context of Piaget’s Ideas. In: U. Müller, J. L. M. Carpendale & L. Smith (red.): The Cambridge Companion to Piaget. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berkling, K., & Thomas, C. (2013). Gamification of a software engineering course and a detailed analysis of the factors that lead to its failure. In M. E. Auer (Ed.), Proceedings of International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, 525–530.

Caton, H., & Greenhill, D. (2014). Rewards and penalties: A gamification approach for increasing attendance and engagement in an undergraduate computing module. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 4, 1–12.

Chambel, M.J., & Curral, L. (2005). Stress in academic life: Work characteristics as predictors of student well-being and performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(1), 135-147.

Chang, E.C., Rand, K.L., & Strunk, D.P. (2000). Optimism and risk for burnout among working college students: Stress as a mediator. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 255-263.

Dursun, P. (2007). Space Syntax in Architectural Design. 6th International Space Syntax Symposium. Istanbul.

Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Smith, J., & Tosca, S. P. (2008). Understanding Video Games: The Essential Introduction. New York and London: Routledge, 293.

Fanfarelli, J. R., & McDaniel, R. (2017). Exploring digital badges in university courses: Relationships between quantity, engagement, and performance. Online Learning, 21.

Fimian, M.J., Fastenau, P.A., Tashner, J.H., & Cross, A.H. (1989). The measure of classroom stress and burnout among gifted and talented students. Psychology in the Schools, 26, 139-153.

Firestone, M. (2006). Computer Game Developer (Weird Careers in Science) Philadelphia: Chelsea House publishers.

Fonseca, D., Villagrasa, S., Navarro, I., Rwdondo, E., Valls, F., & Sanchez, A. (2017). Urban Gamification in Architecture Education. World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, 335-341.

Freitas, S. (2006). Learning in Immersive Worlds: a Review of Game Based Learning, JISC.

Gabe , Z. (2010). The Future of Creativity and Innovation is Gamification, Youtube.

Haaranen, L., Ihantola, P., Hakulinen, L., & Korhonen, A. (2014). How (not) to introduce badges to online exercises. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 33-38. New York, NY: ACM Press.

Hebert, S. (2018). The power of Gamification in Education. TEDx UAIberta.

Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo ludens: A study of the play‐element in cult.

Hung, Y., & Chia, A. (2018). Gamification as Design Thinking. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(3), 549-559.

Kelly. (2003). Decision Making Using Game Theory: an Introduction for Managers, Cambridge University Press.

Koropets, O., Fedorova, A., & Kacane, I. (2019). Emotional and Academic Burnout of Students Combining Education and Work. 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 8227-8232.

Lawson, B. (2005). How Designer Think: The Design Process Demystified

Martens, A., Diener, H., & Malo, S. (2008). Game-based Learning with Computers - Learning, Simulations, and Games Transactions on Edutainment, 5080,172-190.

Martínez , I., Marques, A., Salanova, M., & Lopez da Silva., A. (2002). Bur-nout en estudiantes universita rios de España y Portugal. Ansiedad y Es-trés, 8(1),13-23.

Maslach, C.,& Jackson, S.E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior 2, 99–113.

Maslach, C.; Jackson, S.E., & Leiter, M.P. (1996–2016). Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual (Fourth Edition). Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden, Inc.

McCarthy, M.E., Pretty, G.M.,& Catano, V. (1990). Psychological sense of community and student burnout. Journal of College Student Development May (31), 211–216.

Muller, U. (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Piaget ,Cambridge Companions to Philosophy.

Neumann, Y., Neumann, E.,& Reichel, A. (2010). Determinant and Consequences of Students’ Burnout in Universities. Journal of Higher Education, 61(1), 20-31.

O’Donovan, S., Gain, J., & Marais, P. (2013). A case study in the gamification of a university-level games development course. Proceedings of South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference 245–251.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. Mc Graw-Hill, New York.

Rahmati, Z. (2015). The Study of Academic Burnout in Students with High and Low Level Of Self-Efficacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 171, 49 – 55.

Robertson, M. (2010). Can’t play, won’t play. Retrieved from http://www.hideandseek.net/2010/10/06/cant-play- wont- play.

Salmela-Aro, K., Kiuru, N., Pietika¨inen, M., & Jokela, J. (2008). Does school matter? The role of school context for school burnout. European Psychologist, 13,1-13.

Schacter, D., Daniel, T., Daniel, G., & Wegner, M. (2011). Psychology(2 th ed.). Worth Publishers, 264.

Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., GonzAilez-RomA, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.

Simson, H. (1978). The Structure of Ill Structured Problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3-4). 181-201.

Tian, T., Schnbel, M.A., & Moleta, T.J. (2017). GAMIFICATION for USER-ORIENTED HOUSING DESIGN, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, 63-73.

Van Oers, B., & Duijkers, D. (2012). Teaching in a play-based curriculum: Theory, practice and evidence of developmental education for young children. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 1–24.

Wiggins, B. E. (2016). An Overview and Study on the Use of Games, Simulations, and Gamification in Higher Education. International Journal of Game Based Learning, 6(1), 18-29.

Yang, H.J. (2004). Factors affecting student burnout and academic achievement in multiple enrolment programs in Taiwan's technical-vocational colleges. International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 283-301.

Zhang, Y., Gan, Y., & Cham, H. (2007). Perfectionism, academic burnout and engagement among Chinese college students: A structural equation modeling analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1529-1540.

Zichermann, G,.(2014). The Future of Creativity and Innovation is Gamificcation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZvRw71Slew

Zumthor, P. (2009). Thinking Architecture(3th ed.).Birkhauser.