Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism(JIAU)

Regeneration of Social and Administrative Features of Traditional Neighborhoods in Planning Contemporary Iranian Cities based on ‘Neighborhood-Based’ Principles

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Hossein Maroufi 1
Pouya Doulabi 2

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Khorasan-Razavi, Iran

2 Assistant Professor. Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Persian Gulf University, Boushehr, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2020.169056.1168
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Urban neighborhoods used to be an essential part of the social, economic, and physical fabric of traditional Iranian cities. Strong ties, a sense of belonging, and cooperation among inhabitants had established an informal welfare system that has limited the intervention of authorities in neighborhoods’ affairs. The formation of the central government and rapid urbanization in the last century has changed the nature of urban neighborhoods from social and administrative units to mere physical urban blocks. At the same time, the application of modern planning tools such as zoning, land-use adjustment, and neighborhood-unit concepts have established homogenous physical neighborhoods with little attention to social issues. A brief analysis of today’s urban issues reveals that the traditional concept of ‘neighborhood’ has little place in the planning and management of cities. Demographic shifts, gentrification, and constant alteration of land-uses in contemporary neighborhoods have reduced the sense of belonging to a local community, and therefore have diminished social cohesion with the city.  As a response to the current problems, in the past two decades, a shift in planning paradigms along with social and economic changes at the global level has transferred the focus of planning from macro scale to local scale of communities. Formation of various discourses such as neighborhood development, neighborhood planning, sustainable neighborhood-based development, urban village, etc.… accentuates the importance of local communities in urban planning and management, on the one hand, and emphasizes the need to revive the value of traditional communities on the other hand. Therefore, this study aims to revive and redefine social and administrative features of traditional neighborhoods in planning contemporary Iranian cities according to the following steps: first, this study analyzes the main social and administrative components of neighborhoods in traditional Iranian cities. Then, the main components of the neighborhood-based planning approach are derived to make a comparison between the former and the latter issues. Finally, this study provides strategies for the social-administrative regeneration of neighborhoods in contemporary Iranian cities. Due to its analytical and comparative nature, this research uses bibliographical documents to define the main components of the neighborhood-based planning approach. Then the social and administrative nature of neighborhoods in traditional and contemporary cities of Iran is analyzed and the main components and indicators are derived from library resources and deep discussion with experts. To make a comparison, a group of experts and specialists in urban issues were asked to compare the social-administrative components of traditional Iranian neighborhoods with the components derived from the neighborhood-based planning approach. The comparison highlights both supportive and deterrent factors in the realization of a neighborhood-based approach in the planning of contemporary Iranian cities. The data analysis displays the fact that many principles of neighborhood-based approach were used to be practiced regularly in traditional neighborhoods of Iranian cities. However, according to experts, some features of traditional neighborhoods such as patriarchy, hierarchical social structure, segregation of ethnic and religious groups, and restrictions on the presence of women in public spheres, are not compatible with the ideals of the neighborhood-based approach. On the other side, some features of contemporary Iranian neighborhoods, such as neighborhood councils, community-based organizations, and ethnoreligious inclusiveness are considered supportive factors in realization of a neighborhood-based approach. The result of this study also highlights two important issues: first, the social and administrative features of traditional Iranian neighborhoods are quite consistent with the components of neighborhood-based approach (however the existence of some deterrent factors are undeniable); second, redefinition and application of the neighborhood-based approach in contemporary Iranian cities establishes a good opportunity to solve urban challenges and urban management issues especially in large metropolises. The findings suggest that although social and administrative regeneration of traditional neighborhoods is associated with many challenges, the use of new planning tools, such as the neighborhood-based approach, can provide the necessary social, cultural, and administrative bases for realization of neighborhoods with a strong sense of identity and belonging. Since this study does not cover a specific statistical population, its results cannot be generalized to all cities in Iran. Future research can adopt a case study approach and define a statistical population to apply the issues raised in this study. However, the suggested strategies in this article can provide guidelines for policymakers and urban planners to provide processes to establish autonomous, self-sufficient, and self-supportive neighborhoods in contemporary Iranian cities.

Keywords

Iranian City
Neighborhood
Neighborhood Planning
Local Community
Arasteh, A. Reza. (1961). The Social Role of the Zurkhana (House of Strength) in Iranian Urban Communities During the Nineteenth Century. Der Islam, (37), 256-259.
Ashraf, A. (1973). Vizhegi-haye tarikhi-ye shahrneshini dar Iran-e doreh-ye eslami [The Historical Characterestics of Urbanization in the Islamic Period of Iran]. Nameh-ye Oloum-e Ejtemayi, 1 (4), 7-49.
Aslani, E., Dehghanpour, M, & Hedayat. H. (2018). Measurement of Social Capital Indicators in Neighborhoods of the Historic Fabric of the City of Yazd (Case Study: Posht-e Bagh Neighborhood). Haft Hesar: Journal of Environmental Studies, 7 (25), 93-105.
Avery, P., Hanbly, G. & Melville, C. (1991). From Nadir Shah to the Islamic Republic, The Cambridge History of Iran, (7), (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bahrainy, H. & M. Azizkhani. (2012). Institutional Barries to the Application of Urban Village As a Tool for Achieving Urban Sustainability in Developing Countries- the Case of Asheghabad, Isfahan, Iran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 4 (8), 43-57.
Bahrimoqaddam, A. & Yousefifar, Sh. (2013). Social-Cultural Factors in Forming District in Iranian-Islamic City and its Functions. The Journal of Islamic History and Civilisation, 9(17): 101-116.
Barakpour, N. & Asadi, I. (2009). Modiriyat va Hokmravayi-ye Shahri [Governance and Urban Management]. Tehran: Tehran University of Art Press.
Bastanirad, H. (2012). Districts in the Iranian Cities of Early Islamic Centuries. Journal of Historical Research, 6 (10), 1-30.
Clark, B. & V. Costello. (1973).The Urban System and Social Patterns in Iranian Cities, The Royal Geographical Society, 59, 99-128.
Coleman, J. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,  American Journal of Sociology (94):95–120
Costello, V.F. (1977). Urbanization in the Middle East, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ehlers, E. (1993). Die Stadt des islamischen Orients. Modell und Wirklichkeit, Geographische Rundschau, 45, 32-39
Floor, W.M. (1971). The Marketpolice in Qajar Persia: The Office of Darugha-yi Bazar and Muḥtasib, Die Welt des Islams, (13): 212-229
Forrest, R. & A. Kearns. (2001). Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38 (12), 2125-2143.
Friedmann, J. (1993). Toward a Non-Euclidian Mode of Planning, Journal of American Planning Association, 59 (4), 482-485.
Habibi, M. (2005). De La Cite a La Ville. Tehran: University of Tehran Publications.
Hajipoor, Kh. (2006). ‘Barnameh rizi-ye Mahaleh-Mabna’ Rahyafti KarAmad dar Ijad Modiriyat-e Shahre-ye Paydar [Neighborhood-based Planning and efficient Approach to Sustainable Urban Management]. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba, 1 (26), 37-46.
Helliwell, J.  F., & R. Putnam, (2004). The social context of well-being, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 359(1449), 1435–1446.
Honarvar, M., Pasian Khamri, R., Taravat, M. (2015). Assessment of Social Capital’s Dimensions in Iranian Cities through Old Persian Literature Text. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh- E Nazar, 12(33), 41-58.
Hoogerbrugge. M & Martijn J. Burger (2018) Neighborhood-Based social capital and life satisfaction: the case of Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Urban Geography, 39(10), 1484-1509.
Isaacs, R. (1948). The Neighborhood Theory: An Analysis of its Adequacy, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 14 (2), 15-23.
Israel, B. A., Checkoway, B., Schulz, A., & Zimmerman, M. (1994). Health education and community empowerment: Conceptualizing and measuring perceptions. Health Education Quarterly, 21 (2), 149-170.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.
Kamrava, M. A. (2009). Contemporary Town Planning in Iran. Tehran: University of Tehran Publications.
Khakpour, B., Mafi, E. & Bavanpouri, A. (2009). Naghsh-e Sarmayeh Ejtemaii da Toseeh-ye Mahaleh-I (Kouy-e Sajadiyeh Mashhad) [The Role of Social Capital in Sustainable Neighborhood Development: Kouye Sajjadiyeh, Mashhad]. Joghrafiya va Toseeh Nahiyeh, 7 (12), 57-81.
Kheirabadi, M. (1997). Iranian Cities: Formation and Development. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Lapidus, I. M. (1967). Muslim Cities in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Latifi, Gh. & Safari Chabok, N. (2013). Regeneration of neighborhood new urbanism principles times in Islamic Iranian cities. Motaleate Shahri, 2 (8), 3-12

Loghman, M., Zarabdi, Z. & Behzadfar, M. (2019). Measurement and comparison of social capital in different types of urban neighborhoods (case study: Soltan Mir Ahmad and Fin of Kashan). Two Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Sociological Research, 7 (13), 61-89
Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of Urban Space: An Inquiry into a Socio-Spatial Process, Chichester: John Wiley.
Madanipour, A. (2001). How Relevant is ‘Planning by Neighbourhoods’ Today?, Town Planning Review, 72 (2), 171-191.
Madanipour, A. (2002). Tehran: the Emerging of a Metropolis (Translated from English to Persian by H. Zaravand). Tehran: Pardazesh va Barnameh Rizi Publications.

Maroufi, H. (2014). Urban Governmentality in traditional Islamic-Iranian cities: the dialectic nexus between sovereignty, religion, and custom, 6th National Conference on Urban Planning and Management with Emphasis on the Elements of Islamic City. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

Maroufi, H. (2018). Restudying the Iranian (Islamic) City Analyzing the Institutions of Urban Governmentality in Iranian Cities and Their Influences on Urban Space During Qajar and Safavid Era. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism, 9(15), 33-45.
Mumford, L. (1954). The Neighbourhood and the Neighbourhood Unit, The Town Planning Review, 24 (4), 256-270.
Nourian, F., Mozaffaree Pour, N. (2013). Function Evaluation of Community Management by Focus in Indicators of Social Capital (Case Study: 7 Community of District 1, Region 21 Tehran). Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 18(19): 47-56.
Oshio, T. (2016). Which is more relevant or perceived happiness, individual-level or area-level social capital? A multilevel mediation analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 765-783.
Pakzad, J. (2011). History of Iranian City:From Begin to Qajar Dynasty. Tehran: Armanshahr publications.
Park. Y. & G. O. Rogers. (2015). Neighborhood Planning Theory, Guidelines, and Research: Can Area, Population, and Boundary Guide Conceptual Framing? Journal of Planning Literature, 30 (1), 18-36
Powdthavee, N. (2008). Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(4), 1459–1480.
Rahnamayi, M., Farhoudi, R., Ghalibaf, M. & Hadipour, H. (2007). Seyr-e Tahavol-e Sakhtari va Amarkardi-ye Mahalleh dae Shahrhaye Iran [The Morphological and Functional Evolution of Neighborhood in the Cities of Iran]. Joghrafiya (Anjoman Joghrafuyaye Iran, (12 &13), 19-43.
Rohe, W.M. (2009). From Local to Global: One Hundred Years of Neighborhood Planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 75 (2), 209-230.
Shahabi, M.R. (2003). Mabani Va Charchoob-e Nazari-ye Tasir-e Waqf dar Fazahaye Shri [The Principles of Waqf in Formation of Urban Space]. Geographical Researches, 19 (1), 135-150.
Temkin, K & William M. Rohe. (1998). Social capital and neighborhood stability: An empirical investigation, Housing Policy Debate 9 (1), 61-88.

Zamani, B. & Shams, S. (2014). The necessity of the community-based approach in regeneration of urban historical fabrics. Haft Shahr Journal of the Urban Development and Organization, 4 (45 & 46), 73-93.

Zibakalam, S. (2014). MaA chegooneh MaA Shodim [How Did We Become What We Are?].Tehran: Rozaneh Publications.

Völker, B., H. Flap & S. Lindenberg. (2007). When are neighbourhoods communities? Community in Dutch neighbourhoods, European Sociological Review, 23(1), 99–114.

Walter, C. L. (1997). Community Building Practice: A Conceptual Framework. In M. Minkler (Ed.) Community Organizing and Community Building for Health. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

  • Receive Date 22 January 2019
  • Revise Date 17 November 2019
  • Accept Date 17 March 2020

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us