Ranking Meaning Determining Factors in the Process of Environmental Perceptions via TOPSIS Technique for Developing the Meaning Cause and Effect Model

Mohsenzadeh, Marjan; Aliabadi, Mohamad; Ghanbari, Javid; Zakeri, Mohamad Hosein

doi:10.30475/isau.2020.186497.1219

Ranking Meaning Determining Factors in the Process of Environmental Perceptions via TOPSIS Technique for Developing the Meaning Cause and Effect Model

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

Marjan Mohsenzadeh ¹

Mohamad Aliabadi ²

Javid Ghanbari ³

Mohamad Hosein Zakeri ²

¹ M. A. in Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shiraz University, Fars, Iran.

² Asistant Profesor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shiraz University, Fars, Iran.

³ Asistant Profesor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shiraz University, Fars, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2020.186497.1219

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Objective and Background: Human requires meaning understanding for perception of the environment. Perception is the process by which we select and interpret environmental stimuli to achieve meaningful experiences. In this process, the mind, as an audience, looks for certain dimensions of the subject to find meaning and concept. Every phenomenon, transfers its message through meaning, when it is in the scope of human perception. The first deliberate or unconscious attempt by human beings is based on the creation of a kind of alignment between their mental states and environmental forces arising from the phenomenon. Only in this case effective communication with the environment and a meaningful experience are possible. In other words, human tries to create a personal identity of architectural space in his mind. Therefore, the audience's atmosphere affects our sense of environment by the organization of elements. Therefore, cognition of latent signs in the environment, contributes to meaning perception by the audience. Hence, in environment psychology, the process of perception, finding meaning determinants will help architects to design. Previous studies in the field of humanities and psychology related to meaning have been carried out rarely; with regard to the extent of the factors influencing the formation of meaning, so far, no research in the field of architecture and environmental sciences has examined the these variables. In addition, the influence of these factors and their interactions, prioritization and measurement of their importance are not observed. The purpose of this study is to investigate factors affecting the creation of meaning in the minds of individuals, to rank these factors to find the most effective priorities, to find the means of communication, and interaction of these factors on each other, and to show how they optimally function.
Methods: This research is applied and it is descriptive from research design viewpoint, which is carried out in a subgroup of the Delphi-type survey method. In the theoretical section of the research, internet resources, archives, and documentary studies have been used to for finding meaning determinant. In this regard, 28 factors affecting meaning were categorized in five sub-criteria. They included 20 “personal factors” in the three sub-criteria of “social and predestination”, “personality” and “adventitious” and 8 “environmental factors” were categorized in two sub-criteria of “physical environment” and “behavioral environment”. Then, according to TOPSIS requirements, a questionnaire has been developed including 71 pair comparisons in terms of two 9-degree spectra for determining modeling and ranking meaning determinant.
Findings: The statistical population of the study consisted of all faculty members and post-graduate students of Shiraz universities. In this research, a questionnaire was used for data collection. To eliminate the risk of sampling errors and increasing the validity of the research, a questionnaire was distributed among the 340 members of the available statistical population through a computer or face-to-face visit. Data were analyzed from 203 returned questionnaires via TOPSIS technique and Shannon entropy method. The results showed that the factors of “identity and personality” (Ci= 1.00, Di+= 0.00, Di-= 0.20) in personality sub-criteria and “the type of human relationship with the environment” (Ci= 1.00, Di+= 0.00, Di-= 0.26) in behavioral environment sub-criteria ranked first. There is no significant difference between personal and environmental criteria in the meaning formation that shows they are not given priority in terms of the meaning formation and they have the same effect. According to the information, attitudes of males and females (Sig= 0.283, H0 result=Not reject), academic rank (Sig= 0.501, H0 result=Not reject) and type of university (Sig= 0.953, H0 result=Not reject) are almost identical and they have the same viewpoint in identifying various factors. Finally, a systematic and comprehensive model of the factors influencing the creation of meaning was developed using Vensim software.
Conclusion: 28 effective factors on the meaning, which, 20 “personal factors” in the three sub-criteria of “social and fate”, “personality” and “Acquisition” and 8 “environmental factors” were categorized in two sub-criteria of “physical environment” and “behavioral environment”. Then, the cause and effect model, by forming an interconnected structure of factors, indicates the way relationships and factors interact with each other, depending on their priority. According to the model, each factor influences several factors. The two factors of “Identity and character” and “Type of human relationship with the environment” have a centrality in the loop of influencing factors, which is evidence of their power of influence among the determinants, because they are directly and indirectly involved in the formation of meaning in the mind. On the other hand, the influence of factors such as “Depth of human presence”, “Experiences and skills”, “Family”, “Job”, “culture” and “sense of place”, which are influential in other priorities, are well known.
By analyzing these relationships, we conclude that everything that human encounters during his/her life, both consciously and unconsciously, is the source of meaning for him/her. Therefore, designers can increase the quality of architectural space and more effectively communicate with audience by considering and targeting each of these factors. According to the discussion above, architecture separated from its functional aspects conveys meaning; it acts as a mediator for determining the meaning and it can affect their perceptions and behaviors as space users forming the individual's environmental behavior.

Graphical Abstract

Ranking Meaning Determining Factors in the Process of Environmental Perceptions via TOPSIS Technique for Developing the Meaning Cause and Effect Model

Keywords

Meaning Determinant Ranking

Meaning Cause and Effect Model

Environmental Psychology

TOPSIS Technique

Shannon Entropy

Abdullahi, M.A., & Motahhari, M. (2012). The Nature of Knowledge from Spinoza’s Point of View. Philosophical Theological Research. 14(1), 51-72.

Abramova, E., & Slors, M. (2015). Social cognition in simple action coordination: A case for direct perception. Consciousness and Cognition. (36), 519-531.

Ahmadi, S., Heidari, M., Bagherian, F., & Kashfi, A.R. (2016). Adolescence and Development of Meaning: Comparing the Sources and Dimensions of Meaning in Life in Adolescent Boys and Girls. Clinical Psychology Studies. 6(23), 149-177.

Aliakbari Dehkordi, M., Peymanfar, E., Mohtashami, T., & Borjali, A. (2015). The Comparison of Different Levels of Religious Attitude on Sense of Meaning, Loneliness and Happiness in Life of Elderly Persons Under Cover of Social Wlfare Organisation of Urmia City. Salmand. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 9(4), 297-305.

Barati, N., & Soleimannezhad, M.A. (2011). Edrak Moharek-ha dar Mohit Control Shode va Tasir Jensiat Bar On, Mored Motalee: Daneshjoyane Daneshkade Memari va Shahrsazi Emam Khomeini International University, Baghe Nazar. 8(7), 19-30.

Bausenhart, K. M. (2014). Mechanisms of multisensory integration in the time domain. Social and Behavioral Sciences. (126), 4-5.

Bjornsdottir, R. T., & Rule, N. O. (2016). On the relationship between acculturation and inter cultural understanding: Insight from the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test. Intercultural Relations. (52), 39-48.

Carruthers, P. (2015). Perceiving mental states. Consciousness and Cognition. (36), 498-507.

Conway, M. A., & loveday, C. (2015). Remembering, imagining, false memories & personal meanings, Consciousness and Cognition. (33), 574-581.

Desantis, A., Waszak, F., Moutsopoulou, K., & Haggard, P. (2016). How action structures time: About the perceived temporal order of action and predicted outcomes. Cognition. (146), 100-109.

Fayaz, E., Sarafraz, H., & Ahmadi, A. (2012). Semiotic of Cultural Landscapes in Cultural Geography; A Conceptual Approach for Detection and understanding Meaning. Cultural Research. 4(4), 91-116.

Fuller, T. (2016). The Extended Scientific Mind. Cognitive Systems Research. (10), 4-36.

Gesler, E. (2008). Knowledge and Knowledge Systems: Learning from the Wonders of the Mind. USA: Ill no s Institute of Technology.

Ghalehnoee, M., Salehinia, M., & Paymanfar, S. (2017). Meaning of Urban Space between Muslims and Jews. Armanshahr. (17), 273-284.

Grutter, J.K. (2000). Asthetik der Architektur: Grundlagen der Architektur-Wahrnehmung (J.S. Pakzad, & A.R. Homayoon Trans.). Sahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Hanachi, P., Azad Armaki, M. (2012). Visual Perception of Chizar District by Chizarian Young Adults. Studies on Iranian Islamic City. (7), 87-97.

Hedegard, D. (2015). Transnational connections: the meaning of global culture in the tastes of Brazilian elites. Poetics. (53), 52-64.

Honari, A.R. (2017). The roots of Mulla Sadra's innovative philosophical views on the self. Contemporary Wisdom. 7(4), 69-86.

Kalali, P., & Modiri, A. (2012). Tabeen Naghsh Moalefe Maana dar Farayande Sheklgiri Hes Makan. Memari-va-Shahrsazi (Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba).17(2), 43-51.

Karatekin, K. (2013). Perception of environmental problem in elementary students’ mind maps. Social and Behavioral Sciences. (93), 868-872.

Kheirollahi, Z. (2012). The Essence of Intellect and its ability in the Cognitive process. Philosophical Theological Research. 2(13), 149-175.

Krimsky, M., Forster, D. E., Llabre, M. M., & Jha, A. P. (2017). The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory. Cognition. (169), 84-90.

Lang, J. (2016).Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of Behavioral Science in Environmental Desing (A.R. Eynifar, Trans.). Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

Lashkari, E., Rafieyan, M., & Andalib, A.R. (2017). Effective Factors on Quality of Urban Public Realms in Mashhad. Urban Management. (45), 449-464.

Menezes, A., & Lawson, B. (2006). How designers perceive sketches. Design Studies. (27), 571-585.

Mesbah, A. (2011). Vakavi Mafhomi Manaviat va Masale Maana. Akhlagh Pezeshki. 4(14), 23-39.

Michael, J., & D’Ausilio, A. (2015). Domain-specific and domain-general processes in social perception–A complementary approach. Consciousness and Cognition. (36), 434-437.

Moeschler, J. (2015). Where is procedural meaning located? Evidence from discourse connectives and tenses. Lingua. (175-176), 122-138.

Nejati, V., Zabihzadeh, A., Maleki, G., & Mohseni, M. (2013). Social Cognition in Patients with Major Depression Disorder: Evidence from Reading Mind in the Eyes Test. Applied Psychology. 4(24), 57-70.

Nikofard, S., Kiani, M. & Karimi, A.R. (2015). Barrasi va Shenzakht Mabani Tarahi Dakheli Bar Mabnaye Edrak Nabinayan va Kambinayan. Nameye Memari va Shahrsazi. (13), 19-36.

Noghrekar, A.H., & Ranjbar kermani, A.M. (2013). Sarcheshme Eede-ha va Eadeal-ha Honarmanan. Majmoee Maghalat Moshtarak dar Hekmat va Honar Eslami. (2), 52-62.

Noghrekar, A.H., &, Mannan-Raeisi, M. (2012). Realization of Islamic Identity in Architecture Works. Studies on Iranian Islamic City. (3), 41-52.

Noghrekar, A.H., Mardomi, A., &, Mannan-Raeisi, M. (2012). Query about the Epistemological Foundation of Contemporary Architecture. Armanshahr. 9(5), 143-152.

Norberg-Shulz, C. (2000). Meaning in western architecture (M. Ghayomi Bidhendi, Trans.). Shadrang, Tehran.

Ottati, V., Price, E. D., Wilson, C., & Sumaktoyo, N. (2015). When self-perceptions of expertise increase closed-minded cognition: The earned dogmatism effect. Experimental Social Psychology. (61), 131-138.

Porjafar, M.R., Sadeghi, A.R. & Yosefi, Z. (2009). Recognition of the Meaning Effect on Perpetuity of Place: A Case Study of Hawraman-E-Takht village in Kurdistan. Housing and Rural Environment. 28(125), 2-17.

Rajaei Ramsheh, S. (2019). Revitalization of Southern Part of the Kish Island with an Emphasis on the Identity Signiﬁcance. Hoviatshahr. 4(12), 77-84.

Relph, E. (2008). Place and Placelessness (M.R. Noghsan Mohamadi, K. Mandegari, & Z. Motaki, Trans.). Armanshahr, Teharn.

Rice, K., Anderson, L. C., Velnoskey, K., Thompson, J. C., & Redcay, E. (2016). Biological motion perception links diverse facets of theory of mind during middle childhood. Experimental Child Psychology. (146), 238-246.

Saberi Kakhaki, S. (2013). The Relevence of the Produced Qualities in the of Iranian-Islamic Architecture. Science & Research Branch. (13), 73-80.

Sadeghi, Z., Saffarinia, M., Sohrabi, F. & Alipour, A. (2017). Effectiveness of Logo Therapy on reduction of depression of women affected by infidelity. Applied Psychology. 11(43), 315-332.

Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, E. (2012). Ravesh-haye Tahghigh dar Olom Raftari. Aghah, Tehran, Iran.

Shahcheraghi, A. (2010). Tahlil Farayand Edrak Mohit Baghe Irani Bar Asas Nazarieie Ravanshenasi Boom Shenakhti. Hoviatshahr. 3(5), 71-84.

Vanaki-Farahani, Z., Pashang, S., & Hoseinzadeh-Taghvaee, M. (2016). Group therapy with the approach of logo therapy on general health of elderlies. Applied Psychology. 10(37), 39-53.

Veskah, A. (2016). Johan Pallasmaa reading phenomenological analysis of the differences in the perceptions of architecture and urban and rural area. Urban Management. (44), 439-458.

Ward, T. B. (2008). The role of domain knowledge in creative generation. Learning and Individual Differences. (18), 363-366.

Waresi, H.R., Taqwaei, M., & Soltani, L. (2011). Analysis of tourism area in the "Mountain Park of Soffeh" on the basis of behavioral pattern and environmental perception of Isfahan citizens. Geography. 9(29), 109-128.

Yang, D. Y. J., Rosenblau, G., Keifer, C., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2015). An integrative neural model of social perception, action observation, and theory of mind. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. (51), 263-275.