Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture, Parand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language Teaching, Faculty of Humanities, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Architecture education has always been associated with two different and complementary processes: creative thinking and linear/technical thinking. Today, the process of training an architect in an academic environment is usually based on design studios, which is complemented by formal training in theoretical and technical topics. This system is based on the idea that it will enable students to develop creative and appropriate solutions. However, this teaching method might cause hidden problems that, in some cases, can hinder students’ learning progress and cause their full potential skills not to be identified and exploited. Ateliers (workshops) in architecture schools are the main teaching tools in which students are exposed to solving many design problems. Since burnout causes the learning process to decline, its reduction is of interest to many academic settings. Burnout is one of the educational system problems at all educational levels, which leads to a waste of power and expenses and can have a devastating effect on personal and academic life. In addition, new and various educational methods, including gamification, have been reviewed, improved, and used over the years. For various purposes, educational non-entertainment games (serious games) are designed to achieve academic goals and values and to develop skills.
Methods: Games are fun ways to learn and provide a safe and secure environment in a simulated environment for learners to make decisions and even make mistakes without fear of real-world consequences. The player can confront a variety of challenges in the games that conform to the latest proven principles of learning effectiveness. Learning through educational games is unconscious, indirect, and effective. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of architecture design education at the undergraduate level in reducing students’ academic burnout and thus improving the learning process of design. This method aims to maximize students’ capacity to acquire information and skills. Their creative and technical competencies have been integrated to improve the effectiveness of architectural education and increase future architects’ work quality. This study was conducted experimentally using a pretest-posttest design with control and intervention groups. The statistical population of this study was the students of Parand Branch Azad University, who were randomly selected to participate in this research. They are equally divided into two intervention and control groups. MBI-GS (S) standard burnout questionnaire was used to collect data, and SPSS.22 software was used for statistical data analysis. The games were designed under the chapter to achieve the research objectives and performed in the intervention group’s studio.
Findings: Student feedback was recorded at each level of the games and at the end of the semester, with very interesting results in student design quality, increased motivation, and interest. Hence, the design learning promotion was achieved. Statistical results show that there is a big difference between the three conceptual sections of academic burnout, including exhaustion (feeling tired because of study requirements), cynicism (having a pessimistic and apathetic attitude towards homework), and professional efficacy (feeling incompetent as a student). There were intervention and control groups among the students after completing the training sessions and holding a post-test. Therefore, the study of academic burnout and effective strategies in reducing exhaustion to achieve educational goals and improve the design learning process was the criterion of this study, in contrast to other previous studies that examined the result of gamification in the product of architecture and design, or studied the purely psychological effects of burnout. The design learning process was examined, considering the concepts of gamification education and academic burnout. Finally, the gamification method in architectural design education was tested in line with reducing students’ academic burnout.
Conclusion: Based on the study findings, it can be concluded that gamification education in architectural design effectively reduces academic burnout, increases interest and motivation, and increases student participation in practical activities of the studio. Therefore, it is recommended to use this new educational method to reduce academic burnout and improve architectural design learning.

Graphical Abstract

The effectiveness of gamification education on architectural students’ academic burnout and its role in the learning process of design

Highlights

- Academic burnout of architecture design 4 students has been examined.
- Gamification training with serious games has been used in architectural design studios.
- The effect of gamification teaching of architectural design on improving the learning process of students is presented.

Keywords

این مقاله برگرفته از رساله دکتری نویسنده نخست با عنوان «ارائه مدل آموزش معماریِ بازی‌وار در مرحله‌ی تولید مفهوم در راستای ارتقا اثربخشی فرآیند یادگیری» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و مشاوره نویسنده سوم و چهارم در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s Doctoral thesis entitled “Presentation of Gamification Education architectural Model in Concept Generation in order to Enhance Effectiveness of Learning Process”, supervised by the second author and advised by the third and fourth, at Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch.

  1. Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2013). Improving participation and learning with gamification. In L. Nacke, K. Harrigan, & N. Randall (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications, 10-17.
  2. Bennour, M. & Vonèche, J.J. (2009). The Historical Context of Piaget’s Ideas. In: U. Müller, J. L. M. Carpendale & L. Smith (red.): The Cambridge Companion to Piaget. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Berkling, K., & Thomas, C. (2013). Gamification of a software engineering course and a detailed analysis of the factors that lead to its failure. In M. E. Auer (Ed.), Proceedings of International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, 525–530.
  4. Caton, H., & Greenhill, D. (2014). Rewards and penalties: A gamification approach for increasing attendance and engagement in an undergraduate computing module. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 4, 1–12.
  5. Chambel, M.J., & Curral, L. (2005). Stress in academic life: Work characteristics as predictors of student well-being and performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(1), 135-147.
  6. Chang, E.C., Rand, K.L., & Strunk, D.P. (2000). Optimism and risk for burnout among working college students: Stress as a mediator. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 255-263.
  7. Dursun, P. (2007). Space Syntax in Architectural Design. 6th International Space Syntax Symposium. Istanbul.
  8. Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Smith, J., & Tosca, S. P. (2008). Understanding Video Games: The Essential Introduction. New York and London: Routledge, 293.
  9. Fanfarelli, J. R., & McDaniel, R. (2017). Exploring digital badges in university courses: Relationships between quantity, engagement, and performance. Online Learning, 21.
  10. Fimian, M.J., Fastenau, P.A., Tashner, J.H., & Cross, A.H. (1989). The measure of classroom stress and burnout among gifted and talented students. Psychology in the Schools, 26, 139-153.
  11. Firestone, M. (2006). Computer Game Developer (Weird Careers in Science) Philadelphia: Chelsea House publishers.
  12. Fonseca, D., Villagrasa, S., Navarro, I., Rwdondo, E., Valls, F., & Sanchez, A. (2017). Urban Gamification in Architecture Education. World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, 335-341.
  13. Freitas, S. (2006). Learning in Immersive Worlds: a Review of Game Based Learning, JISC.
  14. Gabe , Z. (2010). The Future of Creativity and Innovation is Gamification, Youtube.
  15. Haaranen, L., Ihantola, P., Hakulinen, L., & Korhonen, A. (2014). How (not) to introduce badges to online exercises. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 33-38. New York, NY: ACM Press.
  16. Hebert, S. (2018). The power of Gamification in Education. TEDx UAIberta.
  17. Hojjat, I. (2014). Tradition and Heresy in Architecture Education, University of Tehran Press, Second Edition.
  18. Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo ludens: A study of the play‐element in cult.
  19. Hung, Y., & Chia, A. (2018). Gamification as Design Thinking. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(3), 549-559.
  20. Kelly. (2003). Decision Making Using Game Theory: an Introduction for Managers, Cambridge University Press.
  21. Koropets, O., Fedorova, A., & Kacane, I. (2019). Emotional and Academic Burnout of Students Combining Education and Work. 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 8227-8232.
  22. Lawson, B. (2005). How Designer Think: The Design Process Demystified
  23. Martens, A., Diener, H., & Malo, S. (2008). Game-based Learning with Computers - Learning, Simulations, and Games Transactions on Edutainment, 5080,172-190.
  24. Martínez , I., Marques, A., Salanova, M., & Lopez da Silva., A. (2002). Bur-nout en estudiantes universita rios de España y Portugal. Ansiedad y Es-trés, 8(1),13-23.
  25. Maslach, C.,& Jackson, S.E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior 2, 99–113.
  26. Maslach, C.; Jackson, S.E., & Leiter, M.P. (1996–2016). Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual (Fourth Edition). Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden, Inc.
  27. McCarthy, M.E., Pretty, G.M.,& Catano, V. (1990). Psychological sense of community and student burnout. Journal of College Student Development May (31), 211–216.
  28. Muller, U. (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Piaget ,Cambridge Companions to Philosophy.
  29. Naami, A. Z. (2009). Relationship Between Quality of Learning Experiences and Academic Burnout in Graduate Students of Shahid Chamran University. Psychological Studies 5 (3), 117-134.
  30. Neumann, Y., Neumann, E.,& Reichel, A. (2010). Determinant and Consequences of Students’ Burnout in Universities. Journal of Higher Education, 61(1), 20-31.
  31. O’Donovan, S., Gain, J., & Marais, P. (2013). A case study in the gamification of a university-level games development course. Proceedings of South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference 245–251.
  32. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
  33. Rahmati, Z. (2015). The Study of Academic Burnout in Students with High and Low Level Of Self-Efficacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 171, 49 – 55.
  34. Robertson, M. (2010). Can’t play, won’t play. Retrieved from http://www.hideandseek.net/2010/10/06/cant-play- wont- play.
  35. Salmela-Aro, K., Kiuru, N., Pietika¨inen, M., & Jokela, J. (2008). Does school matter? The role of school context for school burnout. European Psychologist, 13,1-13.
  36. Schacter, D., Daniel, T., Daniel, G., & Wegner, M. (2011). Psychology(2 th ed.). Worth Publishers, 264.
  37. Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., GonzAilez-RomA, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
  38. Simson, H. (1978). The Structure of Ill Structured Problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3-4). 181-201.
  39. Tian, T., Schnbel, M.A., & Moleta, T.J. (2017). GAMIFICATION for USER-ORIENTED HOUSING DESIGN, Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, 63-73.
  40. Van Oers, B., & Duijkers, D. (2012). Teaching in a play-based curriculum: Theory, practice and evidence of developmental education for young children. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 1–24.
  41. Wiggins, B. E. (2016). An Overview and Study on the Use of Games, Simulations, and Gamification in Higher Education. International Journal of Game Based Learning, 6(1), 18-29.
  42. Yang, H.J. (2004). Factors affecting student burnout and academic achievement in multiple enrolment programs in Taiwan's technical-vocational colleges. International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 283-301.
  43. Zhang, Y., Gan, Y., & Cham, H. (2007). Perfectionism, academic burnout and engagement among Chinese college students: A structural equation modeling analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1529-1540.
  44. Zichermann, G,.(2014). The Future of Creativity and Innovation is Gamificcation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZvRw71Slew
  45. Zumthor, P. (2009). Thinking Architecture(3th ed.).Birkhauser.