Identification and evaluation of physical factors affecting the "Presence-ability" of residential complex’s open space for children aged 3 to 6 years

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 M.A. in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran.

Abstract
Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: The demand for mass housing has led to a focus on building structures while often neglecting the open spaces in residential complexes. Due to the educational and psychological importance of play and social interaction, children are particularly affected by the underutilization of these spaces. The lack of understanding of the concept of “Presence-ability,” which results in the creation of unplanned areas, highlights the urgent need to reevaluate the design of open spaces in residential complexes. This research aims to develop a model that demonstrates the relationship between the components of presence and the physical factors of residential complexes, as well as to understand the impact of each variable on “Presence-ability.” Drawing on previous studies and theories by Schultz and Heidegger, the research aims to identify the concept of presence, explore its components, and establish its connection to the physical characteristics of open spaces in residential complexes.
Methods: The research methodology consists of two distinct qualitative and quantitative stages. Initially, with qualitative approach, the study delves into existing literature and draws upon Schultz’s theory of ‘presence’ to differentiate it from the concept of ‘existence’. Subsequently, logical reasoning is utilized to explore the relationship between various dimensions of presence, such as function, comprehension and implementation, and then its subcomponents, including orientation, accustom, memory, and identification, in relation to physical factors within residential complexes. To ensure precise results and uncover correlations between variables, physical factors within residential complexes are categorized into fixed factors (mass and open space) and semi-fixed factors (outdoor furniture and children’s play equipment). Following this categorization, components are measured through a questionnaire distributed among selected complexes in Sari city, targeting parents of children residing in these complexes. Collected data is analyzed using Lertap software, with further examination conducted through multiple regression and ANOVA tests in SPSS software to assess the relationships between components within each case.
Findings: The research findings indicate that the “Presence-ability” of open spaces can be evaluated based on four key factors: orientation, familiarity, memory, and identification. Additionally, within these factors, the specific characteristics of the place and meaningful motifs in identification, spatial transparency and the sequence of signs in orientation, natural background, activities and events in memory, and recognition of physical changes along with the use of indicators in familiarity have the greatest impact on the “Presence-ability” of open spaces.
Conclusion: In conclusion, design solutions can be proposed based on the findings of the research to enhance the “Presence-ability” of open residential spaces for children, highlighting the significance of physical factors over non-physical ones. Key physical interventions may include removing visual obstacles such as trees, signs, and light poles, constructing a playground centrally or near residential blocks, installing lighting or other rhythmic elements, and creating guiding signs like color blocks, window frames, or façade materials to aid children’s orientation in the open space. Additionally, defining boundaries around the complex with walls, incorporating play equipment in various colors within the play area, and designing the play space with specific dimensions can help children personalize their surroundings. Other memorable elements could include the arrangement of blocks that encourage recreational activities and interactions among residents or peers, maximizing the use of green spaces through gardens, tree planting, and decorative pots, which can foster lasting memories for children. Finally, features such as fencing around playgrounds, allowing children to engage with their environment by planting flowers or modifying the playground to their liking, arranging play equipment in a peripheral layout, and constructing play areas with distinct geometric shapes are design solutions that can promote a sense of identification with the environment in children.

Graphical Abstract

Identification and evaluation of physical factors affecting the Presence-ability of residential complex’s open space for children aged 3 to 6 years

Highlights

- Presenting a conceptual model of the “Presence-ability” of open space in residential complexes for children aged 3 to 6 years.
- Measuring the relationship between the presence of open space in residential complexes with fixed (mass and open space) and semi-fixed (furniture) physical variables.
Determining the contribution of each physical component to create a “Presence-able” open space.
- Differentiating the concept of “presence” from the concept of “existence” and investigating the relationship between the two.

Keywords

Subjects


این مقاله برگرفته از پایان‌نامه کارشناسی‌ارشد نویسنده نخست با عنوان «طراحی مجتمع مسکونی در شهر ساری با تاکید بر عوامل کالبدی موثر بر حضورپذیری کودکان 3 تا 5 ساله» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم در دانشگاه گلستان انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s master thesis entitled “Designing a residential complex in Sari city with an emphasis on the physical factors affecting the presence of 3 to 5 year old children”, supervised by the second author, at Golestan University. 

 

  1. Aghdasi, M. Fathirezaie, Z. Abbaspour, K. (2021). The Effect of Environmental Contexts from Ecological Perspective on Motor Development and Creativity of Children. Quarterly Journal of New Thoughts on Education, 8(2):157. doi: 10.3390/children8020157.
  2. Alexander, C. (1966). The City as a Mechanism for Sustaining Human Contact. University of California, Routledge.
  3. Alizadeh Moghadam, S; Zakarian, M; Tashari, B. (2017).  Re-designing the pedestrian path with the approach of improving the quality of people's attendance in the historical context of Yazd city, case example: Farrokhi Street Pedestrian. Research and Urban Planning Journal, 9(34), 133-148 [In Persian]
  4. Aram, F; Karai, F; Habibi, M. (2014). Investigating the role of green spaces on the presence of residents and increasing social interactions in neighborhoods with periodic markets, a case example: the daily markets of Hamedan city. Iranian Society of Architecture and Urban Planning, 8(13), 135-146 [In Persian]
  5. Azizi, M. (2006). Sustainable residential area: a case study of Narmak. Fine arts magazine, 27(27), 35-46 [In Persian]
  6. Bandar Abad, A. (2016). Comparative comparison of the concepts of "place" and "out of place" in the social development of the city from the point of view of environmental psychology. Social Development and Welfare Planning Quarterly, 8(32), 139-170 [In Persian]
  7. Boxberger, K. Reimers, A.(2019). Parental Correlates of Outdoor Play in Boys and Girls Aged 0 to 12—A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health: 16(2), Doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020190.
  8. Chang, Z., Wang, S., & Zhang, X. (2020). Seasonal variations in physical activity and sedentary behavior among preschool children in a Central China city. American Journal of Human Biology, 32(6), e23406.
  9. Collins, A. Jodie, B. Cheryl, R. Thomas,K. (2020). Describing the Psychosocial Profile and Unmet Support Needs of Parents Caring for a Child with a Life-Limiting Condition: A Cross-Sectional Study of Caregiver-Reported Outcomes. Palliative Medicine, 34(3), 358-366.
  10. Corsaro, W. A. (2020). Big ideas from little people: What research with children contributes to social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 83(1), 5-25.
  11. Cosco, N. Moore, R.Islam, M.( 2010). Behavior Mapping: A Method for Linking Preschool Physical Activity and Outdoor Design. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 42(3): 513-519.
  12. Dajliri, N; Kazemi, A; Nasri, R. (2018). Evaluation of architectural components effective on improving attendance in cultural-leisure complexes. 6th National Conference of Applied Researches in Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Management, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/927350 [In Persian]
  13. Datar, A., Nicosia, N., & Shier, V. (2013). Parent perceptions of neighborhood safety and children's physical activity, sedentary behavior, and obesity: evidence from a national longitudinal study. American journal of epidemiology, 177(10), 1065-1073.
  14. Downing, F. (2003). Transcending Memory: Remembrance and the Design of Place. Design Studies, collage of Architecture 24(3): 213–235.
  15. Ergler, C. R., Freeman, C., & Guiney, T. (2020). Walking with preschool‐aged children to explore their local wellbeing affordances. Geographical Research, 59(1), 118-135.
  16. Esmailian, S; Ranjbar, E. (2013). A thorough investigation of the factors affecting the formation and transmission of collective memories in urban public spaces (case example: Tehran, Tajrish Square, Baharestan Square and Teatarshahr Square). Arman shahr Journal. 5(11), 181-194 [In Persian]
  17. Fagan, G. (2015). memory in architecture : chapter one. University of Warsaw.
  18. Falahat, M; Nouhi, S. (2013). The nature of signs and its role in enhancing the sense of place in architectural space. Journal of Fine Arts, 17(1), 69-82 [In Persian]
  19. Gandah, D. A. F. (2017). Children & outdoor urban spaces planning. Children, 55.
  20. Ghekiere, A., Deforche, B., Carver, A., Mertens, L., de Geus, B., Clarys, P., & Van Cauwenberg, J. (2017). Insights into children’s independent mobility for transportation cycling—which socio-ecological factors matter. Journal of science and medicine in sport, 20(3), 267-272.
  21. Han, C. S., Mâsse, L. C., Wilson, A., Janssen, I., Schuurman, N., & Brussoni, M. (2018). State of play: Methodologies for investigating children's outdoor play and independent mobility. Children, Youth and Environments, 28(2), 194-231.
  22. Hasanzadegan, S. (2015). Principles and criteria of designing a child-friendly park with emphasis on natural elements (case example: Shahadai Park, Yafetabad). Journal of Applied Science Studies in Engineering, 2(4), 43-59 [In Persian]
  23. Heidegger, M. (1960). Being and Time. Published by: Blackwell.
  24. Hinkley, T., Brown, H., Carson, V., & Teychenne, M. (2018). Cross sectional associations of screen time and outdoor play with social skills in preschool children. PloS one, 13(4), e0193700.
  25. IJsselsteijn, W. (2002). Understanding presence. Proceedings of the AIIA, Siena, Italy.
  26. Jalili Sadrabad, S; Behzadfar, M; Yazdan Niaz, A. (2014). The role of lighting in the presence of children in city parks; Case example: Children's playground in Fadak Park, Tehran. Armanshahr Architecture and Urbanism Magazine. 8(2), 133-141 [In Persian]
  27. Lambert, A., Vlaar, J., Herrington, S., & Brussoni, M. (2019). What is the relationship between the neighbourhood built environment and time spent in outdoor play? A systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(20), 3840.
  28. Li, C., & Seymour, M. (2018). Children’s perceptions of neighborhood environments for walking and outdoor play. Landscape Research. Doi: 10.1080/01426397.2018.1460336.
  29. Lonigan, C. J., Anthony, J. L., Phillips, B. M., Purpura, D. J., Wilson, S. B., & McQueen, J. D. (2009). The nature of preschool phonological processing abilities and their relations to vocabulary, general cognitive abilities, and print knowledge. Journal of educational psychology, 101(2), 345.
  30. Lynch, K. (1995). City sense and city design: writings and projects of Kevin Lynch. MIT press.
  31. Mantovani, G., & Riva, G. (1999). “Real” presence: how different ontologies generate different criteria for presence, telepresence, and virtual presence. Presence, 8(5), 540-550.
  32. Moran, M. R., Plaut, P., & Merom, D. (2017). Is the grass always greener in suburban neighborhoods? Outdoors play in suburban and inner-city neighborhoods. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(7), 759.
  33. Nikravesh, R; Ghasemi Sichani, M. (2013). Recognizing the role of the spirit of place in the design of children's space: based on Norberg Schultz's cognitive phenomenology. Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 7(1), 145-172 [In Persian]
  34. Oliver, M., McPhee, J., Carroll, P., Ikeda, E., Mavoa, S., Mackay, L., ... & Witten, K. (2016). Neighborhoods for Active Kids: study protocol for a cross-sectional examination of neighborhood features and children's physical activity, active travel, independent mobility and body size. BMJ open, 6(8), e013377.
  35. Pakzad, J. (2010). The flow of ideas in urban planning from space to place. Shahidi & Arman shahr Publications [In Persian]
  36. Pang, W., Lu, Y., Long, H., Wang, Q., & Lin, L. (2020). Three-generational families: Are they beneficial to Chinese children’s creativity?. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100623.
  37. Pourmand, H; Mahmoudinejad, H; Ranj Azmai Azari, M. (2009). The concept of "place and mental image" and its levels in urban planning from the perspective of "Christian Norbery Schultz" in the phenomenological approach. Journal of Urban Management, 8(26), 72-97 [In Persian]
  38. Qara Beigloo, M; Eynifar, A; Yazidi, A. (2013). Improving the child's interaction with the outdoor space of residential complexes; A case study of three types of space. Journal of Fine Arts, 18(2), 69-82 [In Persian]
  39. Rapoport, A. (1998). Using “culture” in housing design. Housing and society, 25(1-2), 1-20.
  40. Reimers, A. K., Schoeppe, S., Demetriou, Y., & Knapp, G. (2018). Physical activity and outdoor play of children in public playgrounds—do gender and social environment matter?. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(7), 1356.
  41. Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness, Published by: pion:London.
  42. Rossi, A. (1984). The Architecture of the City. Published by: Cambridge: MIT Press.
  43. Sadegh Saberi, M; Qadrjani, R; Hajian Zaidi, M. (2016). Designing the social action space of children in the open area of ​​residential complexes, with the approach of creativity and social interactions. Journal of Art and Architecture Studies, 2(6), 13-27 [In Persian]
  44. Schulz, C. (2007). Architecture: presence, language and place. Third edition, translated by Alireza Seyed Ahmadian. Tehran: Nilufar Publications [In Persian]
  45. Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: An empirical measurement. geoforum, 22(3), 347-358.
  46. Slater, M. (2003). A note on presence terminology. Presence connect, 3(3), 1-5.
  47. Tayebi, A; Zakavot, K. (2016). Domestic tourists' mental image of the urban spaces of Isfahan with the approach of contextual theory. Scientific Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 2(27), 63-78 [In Persian]
  48. Tezel, E. (2016). Exploring parental concerns about children's interactions in gated communities: A case study in Istanbul. In Diverse Spaces of Childhood and Youth (pp. 144-156). Routledge.
  49. Zekri, A; Jamalzadeh, S. (2016). Evaluation of the factors of sense of belonging to a place in improving the quality of life of residents of nursing homes. Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Development Magazine, 11(25), 293-300 [In Persian]
  50. Zhang, H., & Li, M. J. (2012). Environmental characteristics for children's activities in the neighborhood. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 38, 23-30.
Volume 15, Issue 1 - Serial Number 27
September 2024
Pages 191-204

  • Receive Date 04 October 2022
  • Revise Date 22 December 2022
  • Accept Date 30 March 2023