A structural model for designing educational center environments based on the treatment and management of Autistic children’s behavior; Case study: Children aged 4-7 at the Bushehr Autism Center

Document Type : Excerpted from a doctoral thesis

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran.

Abstract
Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Today, identifying architectural patterns that contribute to the improvement of autism-friendly environments is considered important. Statistical research at the national level also shows that most of the centers designed for autistic children are either unsuitable in terms of environmental effects, standards, and structural criteria, or are designed without considering the impact that architecture and the environment can have on facilitating communication. Autistic children experience the physical environment very differently than others, and in educational spaces for typical children, they often experience fear and anxiety. This becomes a major obstacle to their education and treatment. This research focuses on the effectiveness of architecture and environment design based on sensory integration for children with autism. It aims to enhance sensory processing, providing opportunities for these children to better manage sensory inputs and improve motivation for behavior. This approach has already been confirmed by researchers in the field. The main goal of this research is to present a structural model for the design of educational center environments based on sensory integration, suitable for the sensory and cognitive needs of children with autism. The objective is to facilitate better treatment and management of autistic children by addressing behavioral disorders and challenges. The secondary goal is to evaluate this model in the physical context of the Bushehr Autism Center for children aged 4-7 with autism. Due to the lack of suitable educational centers for autistic children and the absence of research on this topic in Bushehr province, the aforementioned study sample was chosen as the focusing criterion of the research.
Methods: In this study, a descriptive-analytical and semi-experimental research method with a pre-test and post-test design, including two control and experimental groups, was applied. The research process was based on a mixed qualitative-quantitative approach, and data collection was conducted in two parts: theoretical (using document sources to develop the model) and field-based (evaluating the model on the physical basis of the Bushehr Autism Center by applying changes to the educational environment of the experimental group). The statistical population and sample size were determined for two groups: educators and children aged 4-7 years at the Bushehr Autism Center. This was done by observing both the experimental and control groups, and by surveying 18 teachers and specialists at the center about the overall progress of 18 children (9 children in each group) before and after the experimental period through completed questionnaires. For data analysis, the reliability of the questionnaire was first measured using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and the data distribution was assessed through skewness and kurtosis criteria. Descriptive statistical methods (mean and standard deviation) and inferential methods (Levene’s test and analysis of covariance) were then applied using SPSS 26 software.
Findings: The findings showed a significant relationship between “designing the environment of educational centers based on sensory integration” and “treatment and management of the behavior of children with autism spectrum disorder.” This important result confirms the effectiveness of the structural model in sensory environment design for improving the sensory condition and behavioral symptoms of autistic children. Additionally, by examining the relationship between autism symptoms and the cognitive abilities of these children in relation to their proper perception and recognition of the environment, it was determined that the disorder in the cognitive process of autistic children is in three areas: “sensory-motor” skills, “social-communicative” skills, and “cognitive-gestalt” skills. These can be addressed in design. By examining global examples, literature, and research foundations, this study developed three architectural models, “Multi-Sensory,” “Neuro-Typical,” and “Space Sequence,” in line with the structural model for the design of autism educational centers. The first model, considering the sensory and motor disorders of autistic children, focuses on the simultaneous stimulation and targeted control of various senses in a controlled process. The second model, addressing the social and communication disorders of these children, simulates social situations with an emphasis on behavioral patterns within the environment. The third model, in response to cognitive and gestalt disorders, emphasizes an organized spatial structure, simple and transparent zoning in the environment, and the sensory significance of different areas.
Conclusion: Based on the results and studies, autistic children are greatly influenced by the sensory inputs created by their environment, and they need a structured and suitable architectural environment that can address their sensory issues and challenges. An architectural design based on the sensory integration approach, in addition to controlling and reducing distractions, can significantly enhance attention and concentration in autistic children. By stimulating the nervous system, it can generally improve sensory registration weaknesses and sensitivities. In general, considering the sensory processing deficits and disabilities of autistic children, it is essential to incorporate the sensory integration approach into architectural planning to create successful and desirable educational center environments. Therefore, according to the structural model presented in this study, which was developed based on the sensory needs of children with autism, the environment can be organized optimally to regulate sensory inputs by understanding the mechanisms of these sensory disabilities and the subsequent needs of affected children. By controlling the sensory input levels and their effect on the environmental feel and perception processes, it impacts the children’s central processing system. This, in turn, helps children adapt and align better with the environment, enhancing their focus in educational centers and facilitating the treatment and management of their behavior.

Graphical Abstract

A structural model for designing educational center environments based on the treatment and management of Autistic children’s behavior; Case study: Children aged 4-7 at the Bushehr Autism Center

Highlights

- The effectiveness of architecture based on sensory integration on the sensory status and behavioral problems of children with autism.
- Explanation of the architectural patterns affecting the sensory design of autism educational centers and how the patterns respond to the treatment of behavioral syndromes and better management of the behavior of children with autism.

Keywords

Subjects


این مقاله برگرفته از رساله دکتری نویسنده نخست با عنوان «اصول راهبردی طراحی قرارگاه‌های رفتاری در مراکز آموزشی- درمانی؛ در راستای مدیریت بر رفتار کودکان 4 تا 7 سال مبتلا به اختلالات طیف اوتیستیک» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و مشاوره نویسنده سوم در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بوشهر انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s Ph.D. thesis entitled “Strategic Principles of Designing Behavioral Settings in Educational- Therapeutic Centers; in Order to Manage the Behavior of Children Aged 4-7 Years With Autism Spectrum Disorders”, supervised by the second author and advised by the third, at Islamic Azad University Bushehr Branch.

  1. Altenmuller-Lewis, U. (2017). Designing Schools for Students on the Spectrum. The Design Journal, 1(20), 2215-2229.
  2. Anous, I.H.I. (2015). The Impact of Interior Design in Educational Spaces for Children with Autism. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences. 10(1), 90-101.
  3. Barakat, H.A.R., Bakr, A., & El-Sayad, Z. (2019). Nature as a healer for autistic children. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58, 353–366.
  4. Baran, M., Yilmaz, A., & Erbas, M. (2017).  An approach to the design criteria of Autism Education Centers Diyarbakır Sample. Current Researches on Social Sciences, 7(3), 279-286.
  5. Beaver, C. (2012). Designing for autism, sen Magazine. https://senmagazine.co.uk/specific-needs/autism-asd/10/how-can-we-design-autism-friendly-schools/.
  6. Behrouzmanesh, P., Naderi, F., Bakhtiar pour, S., & Hafezi, F. (2023). Training Efficacy According to Sensory Integration on the Sensory State of the Children With High-Performance Autism Spectrum. Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 12(4), 760- 773. [In Persian]
  7. Casson, J., Hamdani, Y., Dobranowski, K., Lake, J., McMorris, C., Gonzales, A., & Balogh, R., (2021). Housing design and modifications for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and complex behavioral needs: Scoping review. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 3(18), 217-228.  
  8. Cosbey,  J., Johnston, S., & Dunn, ML. (2010). Sensory processing disorders and social participation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(3), 73-462.
  9. Ehsanifar, H. (2020). Designing therapeutic and educational spaces for autism spectrum disorder. Tehran: Science and Science Publishing. [In Persian]
  10. Emad, V. (2014). The effectiveness of sensory integration method on social interaction of students with autism spectrum disorder. University Tehran, Tehran , MA. [In Persian]
  11. Frith, U. (2014). Autism: A Very Short Introduction (H.d. Pouretemad, & S. mahabadi,Trans.). Tehran: Elm Publication. [In Persian]
  12. Gaines, K., Bourne, A., Pearson, M, & Kleibrink, M. (2016). Designing for Autism Spectrum Disorders. Routledge.
  13. Gilliam, J. E. (1995). Gilliam Autism Rating Scale: Examiner, s Manual, Austin. TX :Pro-ED.
  14. Henry, C.N. (2011). Designing for Autism: The “Neuro-Typical” Approach, ArchDaily. http://www.archdaily.com/181402/designing-for-autism-the-neuro-typical-approach/.
  15. Hodges, H., Fealko, C., & Soares, N. (2020). Autism spectrum disorder: definition, epidemiology, causes, and clinical evaluation. Journal of Translational Pediatrics, 9(1), 65.
  16. Hosseini, S.B & Razavi, N., (2021). Architecture as a healing factor for autistic children.Tehran:Pars University Press. [In Persian]
  17. Iranian Autism Association. (2019). A practical guide for teaching students with autism (blue for autism). Tehran: Baath publishing house. [In Persian]
  18. Iwanaga, R., Honda, S., Nakane, H., Tanaka, K., Toeda, H., Tanaka, G. (2014). Pilot study: Efficacy of sensory integration therapy for Japanese children with high‐functioning autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Occupational Therapy International, 21(1), 4-11.
  19. Jamshidian E., Jalili N., & Haghgoo, H. (2016). The effect of sensory processing abilities on participation of children with autism. Journal of Daneshvar Medicine, 23 (120), 33-45. [In Persian]
  20. Jao Keehn, R.J., Pueschel, E.B., Gao, Y., Jahedi, A., Alemu, K., Carper, R., & et al. (2021). Underconnectivity between visual and salience networks and links with sensory abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 60(2), 274-285.
  21. Jiujias, M., Kelley, E., & Hall, L. (2017). Restricted, repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A comparative review. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48(6), 944-959.
  22. Kanakri, Sh. (2017). Acoustic Design and Repetitive Speech and Motor Movement in Children with Autism. Environment and Ecology Research, 5(1), 39-44.
  23. Karbalai Hossein Ghayathvand, A., Sattari, V., Sultanzadeh, H., & Farhabed, M. (2019). Presenting the analysis model in order to identify and evaluate the environmental components effective on increasing the social interactions of children with autism in educational centers using the process of hierarchical analysis. Armanshahr Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 12(28), 75-89. [In Persian]
  24. Karbalai Hosseini Ghiathvand, A., Sohaili, J., & Metin, M. (2022). Effective design criteria on the behavioral problems of autistic children in exceptional schools. Armanshahr Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 15(40), 163-175. [In Persian]
  25. Karbalai Hosseini Ghiathvand, A., Sohaili, J., Metin, M., & Pourbakht, A. (2020). Presenting the model of sensory diversity in the design of the educational environment of children with autism disorder with the approach of environmental perception. Journal of Disability Studies, (10), 255. [In Persian]
  26. Kazemi Shishwan, M., & Sharif Khajeh Pasha, S. (2019). The role of the physical architecture environment on the treatment of autism in children 4-10 years in Urmia. Armanshahr Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 12(29),153-166. [In Persian]
  27. Khaki, A., & Mahdavi, M. (2020). Designing learning spaces for children with autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Exceptional Education, 2(160),71-82. [In Persian]
  28. Khodapanahi, M. K., & Irvani, M. (2017). Psychology of emotion and perception. Tehran: Samit Publications. [In Persian]
  29. Kinnaer, M., Baumers, S., & Heylighen, A. (2016). Autism-friendly architecture from the outside in and the inside out: An explorative study based on autobiographies of autistic people, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(2), 179-195.
  30. Lind, S.E., Williams, D.M., Raber, J., Peel, A., & Bowler, D.M. (2013). Spatial navigation impairments among intellectually high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder: exploring relations with theory of mind, episodic memory, and episodic future thinking. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(4), 1189-1199.
  31. Maqsood Ali, S. (2019). Symptoms of a child with autism. Children's Mental Health Quarterly, No. 10. [In Persian]
  32. Milton, D.E.M., Martin, N., & Melham, P. (2016). Beyond reasonable adjustment: autistic-friendly spaces and Universal Design. Autism and Intellectual Disability in Adults, 1, 81-85.
  33. Mostafa, M. (2008). An architecture for autism: Concepts   of design intervention for the autistic user. International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR, 2(1), 189–211.
  34. Mostafa, M. (2014). Architecture for autism: Autism aspectss in school design. International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR, 8(1), 143–58.
  35. Muffly, A. (2014). Sensory processing of individuals who have experienced sexual assault. Ithaca College, New York, PhD. 
  36. Naseh, H. (2015). Along with autism, from diagnosis to treatment for children who want but don't know how. Tehran: Danje Publishing. [In Persian]
  37. Nazare, H. (2015). Comparison of the effect of group and individual sensory-motor integration activities on motor skills and social development of autistic children. Al-Zahra University, Tehran, MA. [In Persian]
  38. Nazari, S., & Karmi Nejad, R. (2015). Methods of adaptation and correction of close sensory processing disorder in children. Exceptional education, 3(131), 46-39. [In Persian]
  39. Perri, R.L., Berchicci, M., Bianco, V., Quinzi, F., Spinelli, D., & Di Russo, F. (2018). Awareness of perception and sensory-motor integration: ERPs from the anterior insula. Journal of Brain Structure and Function, 223(8), 3577-92.
  40. Pouya, S., Bayındır, E., & Pouya, S. (2024). Sensory garden design proposal for children with autism spectrum disorder. 39(1), 44- 57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12466.
  41. Roos, B.A., Mobach, M., & Heylighen, A. (2022). How does architecture contribute to reducing behaviours that challenge? A scoping review. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 127, 104229.
  42. Sadeghian, A. (2015). Case study of the effectiveness of sensory-motor integration exercises in reducing the symptoms of children with autism spectrum disorder. Semnan University, Semnan, MA.
  43. Sadock, B.J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2018). Kaplan and Sadok's Synopsis of psychiatry (F.Rezaei, Trans.). Tehran: Arajmand Publications. [In Persian]
  44. Sartip Zadeh, L., Ghasemi Sichani, M., & Mojahedi, H. (2017). Analyzing educational centers for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) Case Study: three autism centers in Isfahan. Journal of Disability Studies,  7(13), 51. [In Persian]
  45. Stanford, C.E., Totsika, V., & Hasting, R.P. (2020). Above and beyond’: The perceptions of mothers of children with autism about ‘good practice’ by professionals and services. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 77, 101615.
  46. Sternberg,  R. (2016).Cognitive Psychology (K . Kharazi, & E. Hejazi. Trans.). Tehran: SAMT Publication.
  47. Taddei, S., & Contena, B. (2017). Cognitive Processes in ADHD and Asperger’s Disorder: Overlaps and Differences in PASS Profiles. Journal of Atten Disord, 21(13), 1087-1093.
  48. Vlaeminck, F., Vermeirsch, J., Verhaeghe, L., Warreyn, P., & Roeyers, H. (2020). Predicting cognitive development and early symptoms of autism spectrum disorder in preterm children: The value of temperament and sensory processing. Infant Behavior and Development, 59, 101442.
  49. Watling, R., & Hauer, S. (2015). Effectiveness of ayres sensory integration and sensory-based interventions for people with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(5), 1-12.
  50. Will, M.N., Currans, K., Smith, J., Weber, S., Duncan, A., Burton, J., & et al. (2018). Evidenced-based interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 48(10), 234-49.
  51. Yates, K. M. (2017). Building Better Schools: A New Model for Autism Inclusion in Seattle. University Seattle, Seattle, PhD.

  • Receive Date 29 November 2023
  • Revise Date 02 March 2024
  • Accept Date 30 May 2024