Enhancing the quality of urban space surrounding mosques through architectural design; Case study: Hakim Mosque in Isfahan

Document Type : Original Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.

2 M.A. in Architectural Engineering, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urbanism, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.

Abstract
Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Urban space serves as a stage for social life, bringing together citizens regardless of their race, age, or profession, and breaking down social boundaries to present a display of the city’s social life. Since the quality of urban spaces directly affects the level of people’s engagement within them, creating high-quality urban spaces is considered one of the key responsibilities of architects and urban planners. In fact, the awareness of construction industry professionals, especially architects and urban planners, about the direct impact of each building on the quality of the surrounding urban space is essential to achieving a city with high-quality public spaces. This study aims to identify the role of the Hakim Mosque in Isfahan as an influential element in the surrounding urban space, focusing on how it contributes to enhancing both the physical and non-physical qualities of the area. The authors believe that the findings of this research, in addition to highlighting the ability of buildings to enhance urban public spaces as small urban components, can serve as a valuable case study for further research by architects and urban planners interested in this topic.
Methods: In this study, the prominent entrances of the Hakim Mosque in Isfahan on the west, north, and east sides of the building—connecting the architectural space to the urban spaces of Hakim Mosque Street, Bagh-e-Qalandar Passage, and Hakim Mosque Alley, respectively—were selected for a more detailed study. The research method was a semi-structured interview, and the data collected from interviews with 160 citizens present in the urban space around the Hakim Mosque at different times during the week were summarized using Maxqda software. The data were then categorized in three stages: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding, to facilitate the study and analysis of the results.
Findings: The data extracted from the interviews were compiled and presented in the form of 24 coherent concepts as examples of the architectural role of the Hakim Mosque in enhancing the quality of the surrounding urban space. These 24 concepts were then consolidated and presented as 12 criteria representing the architectural impact. These criteria include: the role of architecture in promoting culture in urban space, the role of architecture in the legibility of urban space, the role of architecture in inducing a sense of place in urban space, the role of architecture in engaging human senses in urban space, the role of architecture in adding decorations to urban space, the role of architecture in restoring visual harmony in urban space, the role of architecture in controlling access from urban space, the role of architecture in strengthening the sociability of urban space, the role of architecture in mixing compatible uses in urban space, the role of architecture in creating safe zones in urban space, the role of architecture in providing safety in urban space, and the role of architecture in ensuring climate comfort in urban space. In the final stage of categorizing the research results, the axial codes were grouped into four main categories (selective coding): perceptual components, spatial components, physical components, and functional components.
Conclusion: Since the examples related to the role of architecture in strengthening the sociability of urban space, the role of architecture in the legibility of urban space, the role of architecture in inducing a sense of place in urban space, and of course the role of architecture in creating safe zone urban space were the most repeated among the interviewees’ opinions regarding the role of architecture in Isfahan Hakim Mosque in adding quality to the urban space around it, these four components can be considered as the strengths of the architecture of Isfahan Hakim Mosque in constructive interaction with the urban space around this building and focused on it to extract architectural solutions for application in planning, designing, and implementing new buildings. Furthermore, based on the research findings and in order to achieve the twelve components extracted from it, the authors explain how the factors affecting construction at three levels of legislation (including the municipal organization, the urban development organization, the national building regulations organization, the building engineering system, etc.), education and culture (including universities and educational institutions, architectural competitions, media, newspapers, etc.), and factors involved in the design and implementation process (including the designer and executive forces) are influential. For example, we can mention “the use of technical committees to guide the design process of new building facades” at the legislative level, “emphasis on the country’s national, cultural, and historical values in the process of training specialized personnel” at the level of education, and “regular study of landmark architectural works in the past and present world in order to increase the level of expectations of the quality of the living space” at the level of the public who involved in the design and implementation process. The examples related to the role of architecture in strengthening the sociability of urban space, the role of architecture in the legibility of urban space, the role of architecture in inducing a sense of place in urban space, and the role of architecture in creating safe zones in urban space were the most frequently mentioned in the interviewees’ opinions. These opinions were specifically about the role of the Hakim Mosque in Isfahan in enhancing the quality of the surrounding urban space. As a result, these four components can be considered as the strengths of the architecture of the Hakim Mosque. They reflect its constructive interaction with the urban space around the building. These strengths can be used to focus on extracting architectural solutions for application in the planning, design, and implementation of new buildings. Furthermore, based on the research findings and in order to achieve the twelve extracted components, the authors explain how factors affecting construction influence three levels: legislation (including the municipal organization, urban planning organization, national building regulations organization, engineering system, etc.), education and culture (including universities, educational institutions, architectural competitions, media, newspapers, etc.), and factors involved in the design and execution process (including the designer and executive staff). For example, at the legislative level, “the use of technical committees to guide the design process of new building facades” can be mentioned; at the educational level, “emphasizing the national, cultural, and historical values of the country in training specialized personnel” is important; and at the level of the public involved in the design and implementation process, “the regular study of landmark architectural works from the past and present to increase the expectations for the quality of living spaces” should be emphasized.

Graphical Abstract

Enhancing the quality of urban space surrounding mosques through architectural design; Case study: Hakim Mosque in Isfahan

Highlights

- Extracting architectural solutions to improve the quality of the public space around mosques by studying and checking people’s opinions.
- Classification of research findings in three levels of examples, criteria and components.
- Providing suggestions to achieve the qualities mentioned in the text at three levels: legislation, education and culture, design and implementation.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Alavizadeh, Seyedeh Elham; Eslami, Gholam Reza. (2019). Assessing the contextual orientation of contemporary additions in the privacy of the historical context of the traditional market of Ardabil, with an emphasis on the empty dimension. Iranian Islamic city studies. 9(37). 29-40. [In Persian]
  2. Aminzadeh Goharrizi, Bahram; Badr, Siamak. (2012). Analysis of permeability indices in urban tissues. Hoviat Shahr. 6(12). 39-48. [In Persian]
  3. Ardalan, Nader; Bakhtiar, Laleh. (2001). The sense of unity. Translate: Vandad Jalili. The science of architecture Publications. [In Persian]
  4. Arghiani, Mostafa. (2020). Evaluating the effect of physical components on improving the sense of security in educational spaces from the perspective of students. Architecture and urbanism of Armanshahr. (31). 1-18. [In Persian]
  5. Babaei, Saeed; Khakzand, Mehdi. (2018). Contextualism in the works of non-Iranian architects in the first Pahlavi period: Alborz and Iran Shahr schools. Iranian architecture studies. 7(14). 171-189. [In Persian]
  6. Bacon, Edmund. (1997). design of cities. Translate: Farzaneh Taheri. Publications of Iran Urban Planning and Architecture Studies and Research Center. [In Persian]
  7. Bahrieh, Prosha; Toofan, Sahar; Akbari Namdar, Shabnam. (2020). Rereading the evolution of architecture in the market structure of Tabriz with an emphasis on contextualism. Iranian Islamic City Studies. 10(39). 5-17. [In Persian]
  8. Cizgen, Gultekin. (2012). Rethinking the Role of Context and Contextualism in Architecture and Design. The Institute of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Architecture. Eastern Mediterranean University, Turkey.
  9. Dabbagh, Amir Masoud; Rahbar, Shadi. (2015). Crystallization of Shiite concepts in the formation of mosques during the Safavid and Qajar periods. Shi’ite studies. 13(52). 167-190. [In Persian]
  10. Feizi Najafi, Neda; Majedi, Hamideh. (2012). Reviewing the limits of urban design intervention in Iran's architecture to interact with architectural innovation. Architecture and Urbanism of Armanshahr. (9). 259-269. [In Persian]
  11. Ghasemi, Tara; Amini, Elham; Modiri, Atousa. (2018). Designing the historical context of Tehran city with the approach of literary tourism. urban structure and function studies. 5(16). [In Persian]
  12. Golkar, Kourosh. (2001). Components of urban design quality. Soffeh. 11(32). 38-65. [In Persian]
  13. Groat, Linda; Wang, David. Research methods in architecture (9th edition). Translate: Alireza Einifar. Tehran university publications. [In Persian]
  14. Hamzavi, Yaser; Ahmadi, Hossein; Vatandoost, Rasoul. (2015). Survey of canvas murals in Iranian churches, a case study of Vank Church in Isfahan, Maryam Church in Isfahan, Maryam Church in Tabriz”. Iranology studies. 5(2). 17-32. [In Persian]
  15. Hayati, Hamed; Rostami, Farnoush; Poudat, Zahra. (2018). Investigating factors affecting the reduction of individual crimes and increasing security in urban spaces using the CPTED theory. Journal of architecture. 1(1). 1-10. [In Persian]
  16. Hedman, Richard; Jaszewski, Andrew. (2005). Basics of urban design (4th edition). Translate: Razieh Rezazadeh, Mostafa Abbaszadegan. Publications of Iran University of Science and Technology. [In Persian]
  17. Kamvar Shalmani, Ameneh; Hanachi, Simin. (2015). Investigating the impact of visual factors of urban spaces on the behavioral patterns of citizens. Hoviat Shahr. 9(24). 65-78. [In Persian]
  18. Karami, Islam; Ghaemmaghami, Parvin. (2011). The process of paying attention to Islamic identity in the physical structure of Iranian cities, achieving an Islamic-Iranian sense of place in contemporary urban design. 1st national conference of Islamic architecture and urban planning. [In Persian]
  19. Karami, Islam; Naghizadeh, Mohammad; Zamani, Bahador. (2010). Cultural considerations in the shaping of urban views based on the structure of urban views of Iran in the Islamic era. Hoviat Shahr. 4(7). 61-74. [In Persian]
  20. Karbalaei Ghiasvand, Abolfazl; Tavakolinia, Moein. (2020). Presenting an analytical model in order to identify and evaluate effective indicators on the promotion of social interactions in pedestrian streets using hierarchy analysis. environmental science and technology. 22(2). 299-313. [In Persian]
  21. Lynch, Kevin. (2001). The image of city. Translate: Manouchehr Mozayeni. Tehran university publications. [In Persian]
  22. Majedi, Hamid; Mansoori, Elham; Haji Ahmadi, Azin. (2011). Redefining urban space. urban management. (27). 263-285. [In Persian]
  23. Malekian, Mahmoud; Izadi, Mohammad Saeed; Sobhan Ardekani, Soheil. (2016). The importance of urban public spaces in the sustainable development of urban tourism. environmental science and technology. 18(Special 3). 237-255. [In Persian]
  24. Mirgholami, Morteza; Vaez Shahanaghi, Amir; Robati, Mohammad Bashir. (2013). Urban semiotics and its role in legibility and identification of the environment. Naghsh-e-Jahan. 3(1). 31-42. [In Persian]
  25. Mohammad Hosseini, Elina; Toghraei, Abolfazl; Mirgholami, Morteza. (2016). Typological analysis of factors affecting the legibility of urban signs. Hoviat Shahr. 10(25). 61-74. [In Persian]
  26. Najari Nabi, Rana; Mehdinazhad, Jamaleddin. (2020). Evaluating the role of physical and functional factors in the sociability of traditional Iranian markets using the space syntax technique. Bagh-e-Nazar. 17(85). 67-82. [In Persian]
  27. Rasoulpoor, Hazhir; Etesam, Iraj; Tahmasebi, Arsalan. (2020). Evaluating the impact of the relationship between building form and street on human behavior patterns in urban physical spaces. Architecture and urbanism of Armanshahr. (32). 113-130. [In Persian]
  28. Rostami, Zhenit; Javidinezhad, Mehrdad. (2019). Coordination of technique, materials and environment and its application in the beauty and performance of traditional buildings in desert cities of Iran. Islamic art. 15(34). 215-239. [In Persian]
  29. Saremi, Ali Akbar; Taghizadeh, Radmehr. (1997). Sustainable values ​​in Iranian architecture. Tehran: Publications of the Cultural Heritage Organization. [In Persian]
  30. Simitch, Andrea; Warke, Val. (2014). The Language of Architecture; 26 Principles Every Architect Should Know. United States of America: Rockport Publishers.
  31. Toofan, Sahar. (2006). Recognizing the role of water in the courtyards of traditional Iranian houses. Bagh-e-Nazar. 3(6). 72-81. [In Persian]
  32. Vasigh, Behzad; Yarikia, Ataola. (2019). Explanation of factors affecting the creation of a sense of place in Imam Zadeh buildings. Islamic architecture studies. 7(23). 37-52. [In Persian]
  33. Zekavat, Kamran. (2013). The place of physical organization in urban design. Soffeh. (60). 65-90. [In Persian]
  34. Zekavat, Kamran; Dehghan; Yasamin Sadat. (2016). Place creation management model and quality building components in the public arena. Architecture and urbanism of Armanshahr. (17). 215-224. [In Persian]
Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 28
December 2024
Pages 159-176

  • Receive Date 27 November 2022
  • Revise Date 13 March 2023
  • Accept Date 08 May 2023