Physical feasibility study of historical schools in adaptive reuse of educational spaces; Case studies: Jani Khan, Shafieiyeh, Rahim Khan, Memarbashi, and Sheykh Abdulhossein schools

Document Type : Excerpted from a doctoral thesis

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Ardestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardestan, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Ardestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardestan, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract
Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Among the most important heritage buildings left from the past in the historical cities of Iran are schools. Many historical schools have remained within heritage sites, but due to changes in educational systems and the construction of modern schools in the past century, only some of these buildings continue to function as religious seminaries and schools of religious sciences. A large number of these buildings, some of which have been restored, remain unused. Considering the spatial and physical capacities of Iranian school architecture, it seems possible to recreate these buildings and transform them into new educational spaces that not only meet the spatial needs of modern educational methods but also preserve sustainable cultural and identity values in the contemporary era. This study aims to analyze the physical capacities of three historical schools in the city of Isfahan to explore their potential for adaptive reuse.
Methods: In this study, after identifying the components of the criteria for evaluating the building and spaces, based on a quantitative research method, 20 architects who have conducted research in the field of historical architecture of Iran were asked to assess the criteria. Then, considering that the semantic differential scale is one of the quantitative methods for measuring people’s concepts and can clarify the presence or absence of a desired concept or quality in people’s perception, the obtained data was first analyzed using the semantic differential scale method to highlight the differences between criteria in a comparative context more clearly. The evaluation of the data was done on a bipolar scale with a seven-point spectrum ranging from -3 to 3. The ten building quality measurement criteria, extracted from the theoretical framework of the research, were arranged in pairs of opposite traits so that the respondents could provide clearer answers to the questions. This was done because, in the five studied historical monuments, each trait has a limit, and the comparison of the criteria is more effective when the contrast of prominent traits is present. Afterward, with the help of statistical tests, the correlation coefficient of the components was evaluated and analyzed.
Findings: In the comparative analysis of the studied schools, it is revealed that in the two schools of Sheykh Abdulhossein and Shafiyyeh, five criteria of natural light, natural ventilation, air temperature regulation, creating silence and peace, and green space are extremely weak. The components of safety and security, and beauty and decoration, on the other hand, are generally rated high, and similar evaluations can be found across all five historical buildings. The utilization of spatial capacities and the potential for functional planning are present in all the buildings, although this potential is less in Shafiyyeh School compared to the others. Movement circulation is favorable in all buildings except Shafiyyeh School, and the variety of materials is also less in Shafiyyeh and Memarbashi buildings than in the others.
Considering that the data showed a strong correlation between the three components of benefiting from natural daylight, natural air ventilation, and natural air temperature regulation through Pearson’s correlation coefficient, the quadratic fitting of nonlinear trends for these components was calculated and is shown in the corresponding graphs. According to the diagrams, whenever a space has windows or doors opening to the central courtyard, it benefits from natural ventilation. In other words, the means of benefiting from natural air are the windows, and the spaces do not have the possibility of absorbing light or air through other means. In traditional Iranian architecture, the concept of a “false window” is rarely seen, as all windows are operable and allow the use of outside air.
Conclusion: Adaptive reuse, as one of the most efficient approaches to historical buildings and structures, addresses today’s needs while preserving the identity of past spaces. It aims to create added value in urban living environments and optimize the use of heritage buildings. This approach has received serious attention in contemporary urban planning, becoming a significant chapter in both macro and detailed urban plans.
To achieve this, it was necessary to first extract and derive the measurement criteria from the theoretical foundations of the research. Ultimately, the ten criteria provided a framework for studying the buildings. The reliability of the questionnaire confirmed that the extracted criteria are dependable and can clarify answers to the research question regarding the adaptive reuse capacities of buildings.
The findings indicate that in historical schools with a central courtyard plan, the supply of light, air, and temperature regulation in the classrooms is provided through openings facing the courtyard, and these three components are interrelated. It is important to note that in the adaptive regeneration and transformation of traditional schools into new educational spaces, light supply can be separated from the air circulation, thus providing more comfortable conditions.
Expansive plans with spatial complexity, such as those seen in Rahim Khan or Sheykh Abdulhossein schools, may create contradictory conditions during the new reuse. The complexity of the plan and the presence of multiple spatial capacities, while one of the most important features in new spatial planning, may also distort communication routes to the outside of the building. In the event of an emergency, this can reduce the safety factor of the building. Therefore, attention must be given to the issue of emergency exits in reuse plans. This is especially important in Iran, where the tradition of constructing buildings is introspective, and the central courtyard limits the communication of spaces with the outside. Consequently, emergency exits, particularly during fires and earthquakes, must be considered in the design.

Graphical Abstract

Physical feasibility study of historical schools in adaptive reuse of educational spaces; Case studies: Jani Khan, Shafieiyeh, Rahim Khan, Memarbashi, and Sheykh Abdulhossein schools

Highlights

- Today, adaptive reuse as one of the most efficient approaches to historical buildings and textures to respond to today’s needs in the form of past identity spaces, in order to create added value in urban living environments, has received serious attention.
- Historical schools are one of the most valuable heritage bodies in the historical contexts of Iranian cities, which can be one of the potential capacities in the adaptive reuse approach, considering the scale, diversity and spatial and typological opportunities.

Keywords

Subjects


این مقاله برگرفته از رساله دکتری نویسنده نخست با عنوان «تحلیل عوامل کالبدی معماری مدارس بر خودشکوفایی هنرجویان معماری (مورد مطالعه: هنرستان شهرستان بم)» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و مشاوره نویسنده سوم و چهارم در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اردستان انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s Ph.D. thesis entitled “Analysis of the physical factors of school architecture on the self- actualization of architecture students (Case study: Bam conservatories)”, supervised by the second author and advised by the third and fourth, at Islamic Azad University Ardestan Branch.

  1. Abbotts, J., Ertell, K., Leschine, T., & Takaro, T. (2003). Building leasing at the Department of Energy’s Hanford site: lessons learned from commercial reuse. Federal Facilities Environmental Journal, 14(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ffej.10065
  2. AE, P. (2021). Benefits and Challenges of Adaptive Reuse in Higher Education. Progressive AE. https://www.progressiveae.com/benefits-and-challenges-of-adaptive-reuse-in-higher-education/
  3. Akbari, A., & Abdzadeh, N. (2023). Feasibility of the Renaissance of Tehran’s Modern Industrial Architectural Heritage Being Transformed into a Cultural Centre (Case Study: Argo Plant, Railway Engine Room, Steel Factory). Art and Media Studies, 4(2), 97–125. https://doi.org/10.52547/AMI.2022.1571.1142
  4. Alba-Rodríguez, M. D., Machete, R., Glória Gomes, M., Paula Falcão, A., & Marrero, M. (2021). Holistic model for the assessment of restoration projects of heritage housing. Case studies in Lisbon. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102742
  5. Arfa, F. H., Zijlstra, H., Lubelli, B., & Quist, W. (2022). Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings: From a Literature Review to a Model of Practice. THE HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT: POLICY & PRACTICE, 13(2), 148–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2022.2058551
  6. Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. D. (2010). The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the field. Cities, 27(4), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.12.005 
  7. Bullen, P., & Love, P. (2011). A new future for the past: A model for adaptive reuse decision-making. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 1(1), 32–44.  https://doi.org/10.1108/20441241111143768   
  8. Cantell, S. F. (2005). The adaptive reuse of historic industrial buildings: regulation barriers, best practices and case studies. State University.
  9. Caves, R. W. (2004). Encyclopedia of the City. In Encyclopedia of the City. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203484234  
  10. Conejos, S., Langston, C., Chan, E. H. W., & Chew, M. Y. L. (2016). Governance of heritage buildings: Australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse. Building Research and Information, 44(5–6), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1156951  
  11. DavosDeclaration. (2018). Davos Declaration Towards a high-quality Baukultur for Europe. Section Patrimoine culturel et monuments historiques. https://baukultur--production--storage.s3.amazonaws.com/baukultur/2022-06-09-081317--davos-declaration.pdf   
  12. Doak, J. (1999). Planning for the Reuse of Redundant Defence Estate: Disposal Processes, Policy Frameworks and Development Impacts. Planning Practice and Research, 14(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459915733  
  13. Emami, M. H. (2013). Jahangir Khan Madreseh in Qom. Rasa News Agency. https://b2n.ir/p49291  
  14. Fadilah, Priyanda, R., & Amalia, R. (2021). Analysis of external factors affecting students’ achievement student of mathematics education of samudra university. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012050  
  15. Foster, G. (2020). Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507  
  16. Fusco Girard, L. (2019). Implementing the circular economy: the role of cultural heritage as the entry point. Which evaluation approaches? BDC. Bollettino Del Centro Calza Bini, 19(2), 245–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6092/2284-4732/7269  
  17. Giliberto, F. (2021). Heritage for Global Challenges: a research report by PRAXIS: Arts and Humanities for Global Challenges. University of Leeds. https://changingthestory.leeds.ac.uk/wp-c%0Aontent/uploads/sites/110/2021/02/Heritage-for-Global-Challenges-Report-2021.%0Apdf   
  18. Glumac, B., & Islam, N. (2020). Housing preferences for adaptive re-use of office and industrial buildings: Demand side. Sustainable Cities and Society, 62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102379  
  19. Guzmán, P. C., Roders, A. R. P., & Colenbrander, B. J. F. (2017). Measuring links between cultural heritage management and sustainable urban development: An overview of global monitoring tools. Cities, 60, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.005  
  20. Haji Qhasemi, K. (2015). Ganjnameh, Mosques of Isfahan (2nd ed.). Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press.
  21. Hawzahnews. (2014). A brief look at Sheikh Abdul Hossein Seminary in Tehran. Hawzahnews. https://b2n.ir/f63430  
  22. Heath, T. (2001). Adaptive re-use of offices for residential use: The experiences of London and Toronto. Cities, 18(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00009-9  
  23. Hillenbrand, R. (2021). Islamic Architecture (B. Aytollahzadeh Shirazi (ed.); Persian ed). Tehran: Rozaneh.
  24. Hosseini Alamdari, A., Mousavi, E., Keramati Sheikholeslami, H., & Saadatmand, M. (2017). The Typology of the Mosque-Schools of Iran Based on the Method of Access. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 14(53), 57–68. http://www.bagh-sj.com/article_51279_en.html  
  25. ICOMOS. (2015). Nara + 20: On heritage practices, cultural values, and the concept of authenticity. Heritage and Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2015.1126115  
  26. Ikiz Kaya, D., Dane, G., Pintossi, N., & Koot, C. A. M. (2019). ubjective circularity performance analysis of adaptive heritage reuse practices in The Netherlands. Sustainable Cities and Society, 70, Article 102869. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scs.2021.102869  
  27. Jasiolek, A., Latka, J. F., & Brzezicki, M. (2021). Comparative analysis of paper-based building envelopes for semi-permanent architecture. In Journal of Facade Design and Engineering (Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 47–72). https://doi.org/10.7480/jfde.2021.2.5510  
  28. Johnson, T. A. (2004). Socio-economic and Political Issues in the Successful Adaptive Reuse of Churches. University of Cincinnati. https://books.google.com/books/about/Socio_economic_and_Political_Issues_in_t.html?id=jWeVDAEACAAJ  
  29. Kahvecioğlu, B., & Arslan Selçuk, S. (2023). Adaptive Reuse in the Realm of Architecture: Global Research Trends and Gaps for the Future Studies. Sustainability, 15(13), 9971. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139971  
  30. Khajouei, A. (1997). Shafieiyeh Madreseh in Isfahan (Registration Report). Isfahan Cultural Heritage Organization.
  31. Kinseng, R. A., Nasdian, F. T., Fatchiya, A., Mahmud, A., & Stanford, R. J. (2018). Marine-tourism development on a small island in Indonesia: blessing or curse? Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 23(11), 1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2018.1515781  
  32. Kourangi, N., & Valibeig, N. (2018). Identifying Rahim Khan Mosque-School Based on Descriptive and Pictorial Documents and Oral History. Athar, 39(82), 53–68.
  33. Labadi, S., Giliberto, F., Rosetti, I., Shetabi, L., & Yildirim, E. (2021). Heritage and the sustainable development goals: Policy guidance for heritage and development actors. International Council on Monuments and Sites - ICOMOS.
  34. Landorf, C. (2009). A framework for sustainable heritage management: A study of UK industrial heritage sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 15(6), 494–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903210795  
  35. Langston, C., Wong, F. K. W., Hui, E. C. M., & Shen, L. Y. (2008). Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 43(10), 1709–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017  
  36. Li, S., Yamaguchi, S., & Takada, J.-I. (2018). Understanding factors affecting primary school teachers’ use of ICT for student-centered education in Mongolia. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 14(1), 103–117. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4997076ae7f7505fefddf11aeb5503eb22305c5  
  37. Mahdavinejad, M. J., Qasimpourabadi, M. H., & Shabestri MohammadLoo, A. (2013). Typology of mosque-schools of the Qajar period. Journal of Studies On Iranian-Islamic City, 11, 5–15. http://magiran.com/p1304578  
  38. Masoud, S. E., & Einifar, A. (2021). A Critical Investigation into Priorities in Adaptive Reuse Theories within the Interior Architecture of Valuable Buildings. Iran University of Science & Technology, 31(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.22068/ijaup.31.1.556  
  39. Misirlisoy, D., & Günçe, K. (2016). Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 26, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.017  
  40. Mousavi, S. A. (1997). Jahangir Khan School (Registration report). Cultural Heritage Organization of Qom Province.
  41. Pintossi, N., Ikiz Kaya, D., van Wesemael, P. J. V., & Pereira Roders, A. R. (2023). Challenges of cultural heritage adaptive reuse: A stakeholders-based comparative study in three European cities. Habitat International, 136, 102807. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102807  
  42. Plevoets, B., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2019). Adaptive reuse of the built heritage: Concepts and cases of an emerging discipline. In Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage: Concepts and Cases of an Emerging Discipline. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161440  
  43. Rasouli, E. (2017). Masjed-Madreseh Memarbashi. Tasnim. https://b2n.ir/d22386  
  44. Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, E. (2023). Research methods in behavioral sciences (46th ed.). Tehran: Agah publications.
  45. Seo, H., & Myeong, S. (2020). The priority of factors of building government as a platform with analytic hierarchy process analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14), 5615. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145615  
  46. ShahSanaei, P. (2022). Shafieiyeh School in Isfahan at a glance. IQNA. https://b2n.ir/z40331  
  47. Sheikholeslami, M. (2016). Rahim Khan Mosque-Isfahan. Wikimedia Commons. https://b2n.ir/m53143  
  48. Soltanzadeh, H. (2006). History of Iranian schools from ancient times to the establishment of the Academy of Arts. Tehran: Nashr-e Agah.
  49. Spector, S. (2003). Creating Schools and Strengthening Communities through Adaptive Reuse. National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
  50. Tiong, R. L. K., Nath, T., & Attarzadeh, M. (2015). Identifying key factors for building information modelling adoption in Singapore. Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law, 168(5). https://doi.org/10.1680/mpal.15.00030  
  51. UNESCO. (2013). The hangzhou declaration: Placing culture at the heart of sustainable development policies. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/H%0AQ/CLT/images/FinalHangzhouDeclaration20130517.pdf
  52. Van Driesche, J., & Lane, M. (2002). Conservation through conversation: Collaborative planning for reuse of a former military property in sauk county, wisconsin, USA. Planning Theory and Practice, 3(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350220150062  
  53. Vardopoulos, I. (2019). Critical sustainable development factors in the adaptive reuse of urban industrial buildings. A fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, Article 101684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101684  
  54. Velthuis, K., & Spennemann, D. H. R. (2007). The future of defunct religious buildings: Dutch approaches to their adaptive re-use. Cultural Trends, 16(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548960601106979  
  55. Wang, H. J., & Zeng, Z. T. (2010). A multi-objective decision-making process for reuse selection of historic buildings. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1241–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.034  
  56. Weber, R. N., Waitoller, F. R., & Drucker, J. M. (2022). Disposable Spaces: How Special Education Enrollment Affects School Closures. Urban Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221126700  
  57. Yung, E. H. K., & Chan, E. H. W. (2012). Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat International, 36(3), 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.11.001

  • Receive Date 25 September 2023
  • Revise Date 24 November 2023
  • Accept Date 04 January 2024