Geometry, the main origin of transcendental architecture

Document Type : Excerpted from a doctoral thesis

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Educational, Faculty of Humanities, Shahid Rajaei Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract
Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Throughout the history of human thought, numerous theories have emerged concerning the essence of architecture, its fundamental components, and the role and significance of each element. These theoretical perspectives have profoundly influenced how architecture is conceptualized, practiced, and taught. Dominant paradigms such as formalism and strict functionalism, for example, often reduce architecture to a purely visual or utilitarian construct—one that functions merely as a physical container for human activity. Such reductionist views tend to overlook the fixed and multidimensional nature of human beings, whose needs extend beyond the material to encompass emotional, sensory, intellectual, and spiritual dimensions. As a result, these perspectives fall short of addressing the full richness of human experience and hinder architecture’s potential to contribute to human flourishing. Among the elements that have been neglected or insufficiently explored in many of these modern approaches is the concept of “geometry.” Far more than a technical or decorative tool, geometry has historically served as a foundational and generative principle in architecture—one that organizes space, creates harmony, and reflects deeper metaphysical realities. This research seeks to re-examine the role of geometry within the broader system of creation, and by extension, within architectural design, through the lens of Islamic philosophy and thought. By adopting this holistic and spiritually grounded framework, the study aims to uncover the true ontological and functional status of geometry in architecture. Ultimately, it aspires to contribute to a richer pedagogical and practical approach to architectural education and design—one that is aligned with the innate nature of human beings and supports a more meaningful, purposeful built environment.
Methods: Initially, the research examines the definition and position of geometry across various human schools of thought. Using an interpretive-analytical approach and authentic Islamic sources, the study identifies this concept and its place within the system of existence, including architecture, thereby shaping the theoretical framework of the research. Through logical reasoning, the roles of geometry in architecture are extracted from this theoretical framework. For a comprehensive understanding, the four causes of geometry in architecture are identified and examined through a case study of the “House of Kaaba,” a manifestation of divine architecture.
Findings: The indicate the following:
- Efficient Cause: Geometry organizes architectural elements into a unified whole for human use, aiming for the perfection of human life.
- Final Cause: Geometry conveys meaning aligned with the architectural function, guiding individuals towards worship and understanding.
- Material Cause: The element of “space,” which must possess specific characteristics and features in each building, proportional to its function and human perceptual powers.
- Formal Cause: The limiting and distinguishing aspects of space (such as floors, ceilings, and exteriors), which must be proportionate to the building’s function and intended meaning, leading to the creation of a unique internal and external volume, decorated with appropriate arrangements.
Conclusion: This research underscores the profound significance of geometry in the realm of architecture, particularly through the lens of Islamic thought. By exploring the theoretical foundations and practical applications of geometry, the study reveals its essential role as the primary generator and organizer of architectural elements. The identification of the four causes—efficient, final, material, and formal—provides a comprehensive understanding of how geometry shapes and enhances architectural design. The case study of the Kaaba exemplifies the divine and functional aspects of geometry, demonstrating its capacity to harmonize architectural elements, convey meaningful symbolism, and create spaces that cater to both human perceptual powers and spiritual needs. This holistic approach not only enriches the sensory and spiritual dimensions of human life but also offers a robust framework for contemporary architectural practice. Ultimately, this research advocates for a renewed emphasis on geometry in architectural education and design, promoting a more integrated and meaningful approach that aligns with the holistic nature of human existence.

Graphical Abstract

Geometry, the main origin of transcendental architecture

Highlights

- Providing a detailed cognitive understanding of the nature and functions of geometry in architecture from the perspective of Islam, based on the Four Causes.
- Operationalizing and presenting the application method of geometry in architecture grounded in the concepts derived from the research.

Keywords

Subjects


این مقاله برگرفته از رساله دکتری نویسنده نخست با عنوان «شاخصه‌های طراحی نما در محله مطلوب از منظر اسلام (سیرت‌ها و صورت‌ها)» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و مشاوره نویسنده سوم در دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s doctoral thesis entitled “Facade Design Criteria in the Ideal Neighborhood from the Perspective of Islam: Inner Values and Outer Forms”, supervised by the second and advised by the third authors, at Iran University of Science and Technology.

  1. Akbari, F. (2018). Quranic proofs of geometry governing Islamic art and architecture. Epistemological Studies, (77).
  2. Al-Qaysari, D. (1996). Description of Fosos al-Hekam. Qom Seminary.
  3. Asadi Tusi, A. N. A. bin A. (1957). Persian vocabulary (M. Dabir Siyaghi, Proofreader). Tehran: Tahori.
  4. Badiee, N. (2002). Frontage: “Sanctum of Connectivity” (Doctoral dissertation). University of Tehran, Tehran.
  5. Benevolo, L. (2014). History of modern architecture (A.-M. Sadat Afsari, Trans.). Tehran: Tehran University Press.
  6. Bolkhari Qohi, H. (2014). Mystical foundations of Islamic art and architecture. Kimiyaye Khiyal. Tehran: Sooreye Mehr Publishing House.
  7. Burckhardt, T. (1986). Sacred Art in East & West. London: Perennial Books.
  8. Copleston, F. C. (2018). History of philosophy (Vol. 1). Tehran: Soroush.
  9. Ekhvan alsafa. (1997). Rasael Alekhwan Al-Safa va Khalan al-vafa. Beirut: Dar Beirut.
  10. Ganji Khyberi, A., Diba, D., & Shahcheraghi, A. (2014). Conformity of form to data: Context-oriented architecture in the digital age. Scientific Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran, (10).
  11. Genon, R. (1994). Dominance of quantity and signs of the end of time (A. M. Kardan, Trans., 3rd ed.). Tehran: Academic Publishing Center.
  12. Gharachmani Asl, Y., Baharvand, M., & Tofan, S. (2022). Investigating the evolution of computation role in simulating the formation process of natural phenomena for generating architectural forms. Scientific Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran, 13(2), 73-88.
  13. Gharshi, A. A. (1997). Ghamouse Qur’an (Vol. 6). Tehran: Darul Kitab al-Islamiya.
  14. Gharshi, A. A. (2016). Ahsan Alhadith. Tehran: Aqeeq.
  15. HassanZadeh Amoli, H. (1984). Eleven Persian treatises. Tehran: Institute of Cultural Studies and Research.
  16. Hejazi, M. (2007). Sacred geometry in Iranian nature and architecture. History of Science, 7, 15-36.
  17. Ibn Arabi, M. (2003). Fotohate Makiye fi marefate asrare Malekiye and Melkiye (Vol. 6). Tehran: Molla.
  18. Ibn Arabi, M. (2012). Aqla Al-Mustafuz (M. Khajawi, Trans.). Tehran: Molla.
  19. Jafari (Allameh), M. T. (1990). Beauty and art from the perspective of Islam. Tehran: Department of Religious Studies in Art.
  20. Javadi Amoli, A. (2007). The dignity of intellect in the geometry of religious knowledge. Qom: Asraa.
  21. Koleiniye Razi, A. J. M. B. Y. (1986). Al-Asule Al-Kafi. Tehran: Dar al-Kitab al-Islamiya.
  22. Lawler, R. (1989). Sacred Geometry (H. Moayeri, Trans.). Tehran: Institute of Cultural Studies and Research.
  23. Madadpour, M. (1992). Spiritual wisdom and the field of art. Tehran: Hozeye Honari.
  24. Majlisi, M. B. (1981). Bihar al-Anwar (Vol. 84). Beirut: Dar Alahya.
  25. Makarem Shirazi, N. (1993). Tafsir e Nemoneh. Qom: Qom Seminary.
  26. Mohammadi Reyshahri, M. (1993.). Mizan al-Hikmah. Qom: Dar al-Hadith Institute.
  27. Momtahen, M., & Nari Qomi, M. (2018). Value criteria for architectural geometry education. Islamic Architectural Research, 6(21).
  28. Motahari, M. (2023). Deep in Nahj al Balaghe. Qom: Sadra.
  29. Nadimi, H. (2016). Kelke Doust. Isfahan: Cultural and Recreational Organization of Isfahan Municipality.
  30. Naghizadeh, M. (2018). The basics of religious art in Islamic culture. Tehran: Nashr Tehran.
  31. Najib-oghlu, G. (2000). Geometry and decorations in Islamic architecture (M. G. Bidhandi, Trans.). Tehran: Roshanha.
  32. Nasr, S. H. (1996). Islamic Art and Spirituality. Tehran: Hozeye Honari.
  33. Nasr, S. H. (1998). The opinion of Islamic thinkers about nature. Tehran: Kharazmi Publications.
  34. Noghrekar, A. (2011). Human interaction with spatial-geometrical ideas in architecture. Theorizing Treatise.
  35. Noghrekar, A. (2012). House of Kaaba: Stem cell in the design of desirable places of worship. Islamic Architecture Research, 1(1).
  36. Noghrekar, A. (2014). House of Kaaba: Stem cell in the design of desirable places of worship. Theorizing Treatise.
  37. Noghrekar, A. (2019). Theoretical foundations of architecture. Tehran: Payam Noor.
  38. Noghrekar, A., Jahanbakhsh, H., & HamzeNejad, M. (2016). Man, Nature and Architecture. Tehran: Payame Noor
  39. Norberg-Schulz, C. (2013). Meaning in Western Architecture. Tehran: Academy of Arts.
  40. Rezazadeh, M., & Sabet Fard, M. (2013). Recognizing the application of geometric principles in traditional architecture. Honarhaye Ziba, 18(1), 29-44.
  41. Satari, J. (1993). An entry on mystical cryptology. Tehran: Center Publication.
  42. Sobhani, J. (2017). Immortal Charter (Vol. 2). Qom: Imam Sadiq Institute.
  43. Tabatabai, S. M. H. (1983). Tafsir al-Mizan. Tehran: Mohammadi.
  44. Taheri, J., & Nadimi, H. (2013). Hidden dimension in Islamic architecture of Iran. Sofeh, (65).
Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 28
December 2024
Pages 177-193

  • Receive Date 25 May 2024
  • Revise Date 29 July 2024
  • Accept Date 30 September 2024