معماری و شهرسازی ایران(JIAU)

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

اخبار و اعلانات

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

هزینه انتشار مقالات

فرایند داوری مقالات

تحلیل پایداری اجتماعی مجتمع های مسکونی به کمک تکنیک سواراتاپسیس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد معماری، گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، واحد تهران غرب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مرور پیشینه تحقیق در خصوص «توسعه پایدار» از نقطه نظر معماری، بیانگر فقدان مدل منسجمی است تا تحلیل‌گران معماری به واسطه آن قادر باشند میزان «پایداری اجتماعی» یک مجتمع مسکونی را به طور کمی تحلیل نمایند. در واقع، مطالعات قبلی عموماً بر شناسایی معیارهای پایداری اجتماعی متمرکز شده‌اند، لیکن موضوع رتبه‌بندی و استفاده از این معیارها برای تحلیل کمی طرح‌های معماری تاکنون مطالعه نشده است. بنابراین، در مقاله حاضر، هدف اصلی عبارت است از طراحی یک مدل کمی و منسجم که به واسطه آن بتوان میزان پایداری اجتماعی در یک مجتمع مسکونی مفروض را اندازه‌گیری نمود. مقاله از نوع تحلیلی و توصیفی بوده و روش گردآوری داده‌ها، مطالعه کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی می‌باشد. ابتدا معیارهای پایداری اجتماعی از ادبیات موضوع استخراج و تخلیص شده، سپس یک مدل کاربردی مشتمل بر تکنیک «سوارا» برای وزن‌دهی معیارها و تکنیک «تاپسیس» به منظور سنجش میزان پایداری اجتماعی ارائه می‌گردد. در راستای اثبات کاربردی بودن مدل ارائه شده، میزان پایداری اجتماعی چند نمونه موردی با هم مقایسه شده‌اند. قاعده انتخاب این نمونه‌ها دسترسی کافی به اطلاعات لازم و نزدیک بودن بزرگی نمونه‌ها به هم بوده است. به علاوه، در کسب نظرات تخصصی، از خبرگان معماری دانشگاه و صنعت ایران، با سال‌ها سابقه اجرایی و علمی و دارای اشراف بر مباحث معماری پایدار و پایداری اجتماعی استفاده شده است. نتایج بیانگر آن است که از دیدگاه خبرگان، سه معیار «فرهنگ ساکنین»، «تعامل و تجانس اجتماعی» و «امنیت» بیش از 60 درصد از کل ارزش وزنی مجموعه معیارهای پایداری اجتماعی را به خود اختصاص می‌دهند.

چکیده تصویری

تحلیل پایداری اجتماعی مجتمع های مسکونی به کمک تکنیک سواراتاپسیس

تازه های تحقیق

- شناسایی مهم‌ترین معیارهای پایداری اجتماعی.
- طراحی یک مدل کمی به منظور سنجش پایداری اجتماعی یک مجتع مسکونی.
- کاربرد یکپارچه تکنیک‌های تاپسیس و سوارا.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Social Sustainability Analysis in Residential Complexes using SWARA-TOPSIS Method

نویسندگان [English]

  • Atefeh Yaghoubi 1
  • Zhila Rezakhani 2

1 M.A. in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, West Tehran branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, South Tehran branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Extended abstract
Objective and context: Among the features that characterize contemporary architecture, sustainability has great significance. It is an approach in architecture that is in line with the modern concept of sustainable development. The latter concept refers to the development of a society in order to address its present needs while supporting the right and potentials of the next generation to address their own needs. Sustainable development includes economic, environmental, and social sustainability. The present article focuses on residential complexes and social sustainability. The literature review on sustainable development from an architectural point of view shows that there is no comprehensive model to help architects evaluate the social sustainability of a residential complex quantitatively. In fact, previous studies have mostly focused on defining sustainability criteria; however, no research has been done so far on the ranking and application of those criteria to evaluate architectural designs quantitatively. Therefore, the main objective of the present research is to develop a quantitative and comprehensive model to measure the sustainability of a given residential complex. The research answers two fundamental questions: What are the criteria for social sustainability in a residential complex? How can we compare residential complexes as far as social sustainability is concerned?
Methods: The present article is based on descriptive and analytical research, and the data was collected through field study and bibliographic research. First, the criteria for social sustainability were laid out through studying the research literature. Then, a practical model was developed. The model applies SWARA technic to weigh each criterion and TOPSIS technic to measure social sustainability. In other words, the following procedure is carried out step by step: bibliographic research to find out the criteria for social sustainability in residential complexes, processing and classifying the results and making a final list, designing a quantitative model to measure social sustainability in residential complexes, receiving specialists' views about ranking and weighting the criteria, devising a method to determine a level (score) for each criterion in a given residential complex, and finally, putting the model into practice and comparing the selected residential complexes. In the final step, a comparison of social sustainability proves that the model is practical. The cases have been selected based on similarity in size and full access to their information. Furthermore, academics and industrial experts with many years of scientific and executive experience in sustainable architecture and social sustainability were asked for their views about the subject to make use of their expertise in this research.
Findings: The judgment made by experts in architecture, as the central part of the findings, show that the most important criteria for social sustainability are the following ten items respectively: culture of the residents, social interaction and homogeneity, security, safety, open areas, appropriateness of population density, quality of interior design, the gate and exterior view, building space outside the apartment unit, equipment, and facilities. According to experts, 60 percent of weighted value is attached to "culture of the residents, interaction and social homogeneity and security" among the mentioned items. The culture of the residents includes a number of features like mutual respect among residents, compliance with apartment regulations, attention to private and public spaces, and cleanliness. Architects' ability to influence this item is very limited; however, they should apply design expertise to separate private spaces from public ones and ensure proper hygiene standards inside and around the complex. Features regarding "interaction and social homogeneity" include communication and social solidarity and relationship, participation in voluntary works and services of the complex, the possibility of resident's participation in the design and creation of spaces, conformity to resident's culture and expectations, duration of residence, etc. When accompanied by variability in space use, innovative and flexible architecture can help residents design multi-functional spaces. Furthermore, security and safety are among inseparable aspects of architecture, and designers must not disregard them for other aspects such as aesthetics and functionality.
Conclusion: The findings show that the proposed model is easily applicable to measure the level of social sustainability in a residential complex. Thus, the model is recommended for either comparing constructed residential complexes or weighing up available construction plans. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainable Architecture
  • Social Sustainability
  • SWARA-TOPSIS
  • Residential Complex
مراجع
  1. Ahn B.S. & Park K.S. (2008). Comparing Methods for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Ordinal Weights, Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1660 – 1670.
  2. Amini, S., Hosseini, S.B. & NorouzianMaleki, S. (2014). A Comparative Study of Satisfaction Evaluation between Residents of Mid-Rise and High-Rise Housings. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 6(11),1-13.
  3. Ansari, H.R. (2015). Evaluation and Analysis of the Functionality of Residential Complexes Case Study: Mehr Housing Scheme (Ghadir Project). Honar-Ha-Ye Ziba Memari Va Shahsazi, 20(3), 95-104.
  4. Arasteh, Mojtaba & Azizi, Mohammad Mehdi (2013). Locating Sustainable Residential Complex in Central Zone of Yazd City Using the ANP Method. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 5(9), 333-347.
  5. Asgharpour, Mohammad Javad (2003). Group Decision Making and Game Theory with a Research Approach to Operations 2607. Tehran: University of Tehran Press (UTP).
  6. Barron F. & Barrett B.E. (1996). Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights, Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 1515-1523.
  7. Bigdeli Rad, V. & Maleki, Sh. (2020). Identification of Effective Criteria on Social and Economic Sustainability in Rural Areas of Iran. Human Geography Research Quarterly, 52(1): 147-163.
  8. Bramely G., Dempsey N., Power S., Brown C. & Watkins D. (2009). Social Sustainability and Urban Form: Evidence from Five British Cities, Journal of Environmental and Planning, Vol. 41, pp. 2125-2142.
  9. Colantonio A. (2008). ‌Traditional and Emerging Prospect in Social Sustainability, Measuring Social Sustainability: Best-Practice from Urban Renewal in the EU, Headington, Oxford Brookes University: Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD).
  10. Colantonio A. (2009). Social Sustainability: Linking Research to Policy and Practice, Sustainable Development: A Challenge for European Research, Brussels, Belgium.
  11. Davoudi, S., Fallah, M.H. & AliAbadi, M. (2014). Social Sustainability and Architecture, Determining the Indicators Affecting the Development of Social Sustainability on Architecture. Paper presented in National Conference on Architecture, Urban Planning and Sustainable Development with a Focus on Vernacular Architecture to Sustainable Cities, Mashhad.
  12. Dempsey N., Bramely G., Power S. & Brown C. (2011). The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability, Sustainable Development, Vol. 19, pp. ‌289-300.
  13. Eghlimi, Amin & Taheri Pilehrood, Bhrouz (2013). Social establishment in apartment complexes (case study of Laleh Ardebil 197 units’ complex). Paper presented in the National Conference on Urbanism & Architecture through the Ages, Ghazvin, Imamkhomeini International University.
  14. Empacher C. & Wehling P. (1999).  Indikatoren Sozialer Nachhaltigkeit, ISOE Iskussionspapiere 13.
  15. Farshchian, A.H. & Masoud, A. (2018). Reperceiving the architecture of the central courtyard of Iran in the green axis of urban planning and architecture. Green Architecture, 4(10), 49-57.
  16. Ghafourian, M., Afshin mehr, V. & Norouzi zadeh, Z. (2017). Recognition of the Components of Social Sustainability and Their Impact on Increasing Social Interactions in Housing (Case Study: Abazar Neighborhood, Tehran). Hoviatshahr, 11(2), 31-42.
  17. Gholizadeh, K., Zarghami, E. & DolatiMehr, M. (2013). Social Sustainability in the Design of Residential Complexes from the Perspective of Residents. Paper presented at 1st National Conference on Sustainable Construction, Mashhad, Mashhad Deputy of Architecture and Urban Planning.
  18. Hwang C.L. & Yoon K. (1981). Multiple-Aattribute Decision-Making, In: Lecture Notes in Economic and Mathe-mathical Systems, Springer, Berlin, Vol. 186.
  19. Johari Teymouri, E., Seghatoleslami, A.E. &  Alipour, H. (2013). Surveying the ways to provide children’ needs at the public extent of cities, with focus on promoting social sustainability, eighth symposium on advances in science and technology commission-III: from vernacular architecture to sustainable city (VASCity), Mashhad.
  20. Jomehpour, M. & Ebrahimi, A. (2015). The measurement and evaluation of the Components of social sustainability in Apartment complexes. Urban Sociological Studies, 5(16), 1-30.
  21. Karami, I. & Mohamad Hoseini, P. (2018). The Effect of Sociability of Public Places on Social Sustainability in Residential Complexes (case study: Mehr Residential Complex's in Ardabil). Urban Studies, 7(26), 43- 96.
  22. Kazemi, A., Motamed, K. & Enayati, S. (2018). Determining effective urban design indicators to promote social interactions of citizens in natural urban areas (Case study: Gorgan Ziarat River). Green Architecture, 4(10): 23-38.
  23. Kersuliene V., Zavadskas E.K. & Turskis Z. (2010). Selection of Rational Dispute Resolution Method by Applying New Step‐wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA), Journal of Business Economicsand Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp.  243–258.
  24. Khademolhoseini, A., Ghaedrahmati, S. & Jamshidi, Z. (2016). Assessment of sustainability in Urban Green Space in 15 districts of Isfahan. Human Geography Research Quarterly, 48(4), 751-763.
  25. Khakzand, M. & Baghalian, A. (2017). Investigation of influential parameters on improvement of social interaction in open and semi open areas of residential complexes (a case study: zone 22 of Tehran municipality). Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism, 7(1), 19-28.
  26. Latifian, S. (2011). Psychological approach to explaining the criteria of social sustainability in the residential complex (redesign of Iran Khodro Diesel residential complex), Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Tehran, Tehran.
  27. Littig B. & Griebler E. (2005). International. Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 8:1/2, 65-79 Brundtland Commission (1987) Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development, New York.
  28. Mahdavinezhad, M.J. & Nikoudel, F. (2015). Interaction between Visual Beauty and New Lighting Technologies for Nightscape of Buildings Facades. Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Development, 8(15), 131-144.
  29. Nahibi, S. & Hasan Dokht, M. (2014). Investigating the effect of urban green space on improving the quality of urban life (Case study: Shian neighborhood). Sustainability, Development and Environment, 1(1), 51-70.
  30. Nastaran, M., Ghasemi, V. & Hadi Zadeh Zargar, S. (2013). Assessment of Indices of Social Sustainability by Using Analytic Network Process (ANP). Journal of Applied Sociology, 24(3), 155-173.
  31. Negari, M., Javan Majidi, J. (2015). Principles of Social Sustainability and Its Effective Indicators in Architecture. Paper presented at National Conference on Sustainable Architecture and Urban Planning with a human and environmental approach, Ardabil.
  32. Parsanik, Z. & Maroufnezhad, A. (2016). Application of TOPSIS Technique in Analysis a Prioritization of Parks In Mashhad (case study: Samen Area of Mashhad municipality).  Paper presented in The Second National Conference On Geography, Architecture and Urban Planning, Qom, Center of Soroushe Hekmate Razavi for Islamic Studies and Researches.
  33. Rahnama, M.R. & Hosseini, S.M. (2016). Estimation and Evaluation of Social Sustainability in the Metropolitan City of ‎Mashhad, With an Emphasis on Five Neighborhoods as Case Studies. Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal, 6(19), 105-118.
  34. Rogers, R. (2004). Great Architects and Sustainable Design (translated by Hoseynmardi, H.), Abadi, 14(7), 42: 52-62.
  35. Roy B. (1968). Classement et Choix en pr ́Esence de Points de Vue Multi Ples (la m ́Ethode ELECTRE), RIRO, Vol. 8, pp. 57–75.
  36. Saeideh Zarabadi, Z.S., Nejati Alaf, N. & Jalili Safarian, H. (2016). Assessment and Analysis of Urban Life Quality by Using TOPSIS Technique in Mashhad. Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Development, 8(15), 301-311.
  37. Saghafi Asl, A., Zebardast, E. & Majedi, H. (2014). Application of TOPSIS Technique in Ranking of Tehran Urban Design Projects with Implementation Evaluation Approach. Honar-Ha-Ye Ziba Memari Va Shahsazi, 18(19), 69-78.
  38. Sajadi Ghaem Maghami, P., Zarghami, E. & Pourdeihimi, Sh. (2011). The Social Sustainability Principles of Residential Complex. Environmental Sciences 8(2), 37-54.
  39. Samadifard, Z., Movahed, Kh. & Jahanbakhsh, H. (2013). Localization and sustainability of the architecture of residential complexes with the efficiency of public spaces in order to increase social interactions. Paper presented at The 8th Symposium on the Advances in Science and Technology in Architecture, Urban Planning and Sustainable Development with a focus on indigenous architecture to sustainable cities, Mashhad.
  40. Saremi, H. & Ebrahim Pour, M. (2012). Studying of Housing Indicators in Iran and World (Case Study: Iran, England and France). Hoviatshar, 6(10), 91-102.
  41. Sedigh Akbari, S., Hematian, N. (2013). Investigating the mental concepts of aesthetics in order to increase social interactions in residential complexes (Case study: Ekbatan residential complex). Paper presented at the First National Conference on Architecture, Restoration, Urban Planning and Sustainable Environment, Hamedan, Hegmataneh Society of Environment Evaluators.
  42. Sheykhi, H., Gharibi, M. & Manavi, M. (2016). Locating residential lands using TOPSIS multi-criteria evaluation method Case study: Behbahan city. Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 6(18), 69-84, doi: 10.22111/GAIJ.2016.2369.
  43. Shojaee, D. & Patovi, P. (2015). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Creation and Promotion of Sociability in Public Spaces in Different Scales of Tehran City (Case studies: Two Neighborhoods and an Area in District 7 Tehran). Bagh-e Nazar, 12(34), 93-108.
  44. Stren R. & Polese M. (2000). Understanding the New Socio-cultural Dynamics of Cities: Comparative Urban Policy in a Global Context in M. Polese and R. Stren (editors) The Social Sustainability of Cities: Diversity and the Management of Change. Toronto, Buffalo, London.
  45. Thinh N.X., Arlt G., Heber B., Hennersdorf J. & Lehmann I. (2002). Evaluation of Urban Land-use Structures with a View to Sustainable Development, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 475-492.
  46. Tupenaite L., Zavadskas E.K., Kaklauskas A., Turskis Z. & Seniut, M. (2010). Multiple-Criteria Assessment of Alternatives for Built and Human Environment Renovation, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 257-266.
  47. Vaez Zadeh, S., Naghdi, A. & Ayaseh, A. (2015). Components of Social Sustainability in Iran's Development Programs. Iranian Social Development Studies, 7(2), 45-59.
  48. Yaran, A. & Behrou, H. (2016). The Impact of Green Space of High-rise Residential Complex on Residents’ Satisfaction, Case Study: A Residential Complex in Tehran. Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Development, 9(17), 151-162.
  49. Zarghami, E. (2011). Principles of social sustainability of residential complexes in Iranian-Islamic cities. Iranian Islamic city studies, 2, 103-116.
  50. Zarghami, E., Azemati, H., Saleh Sedighpour, B. & Gholizadeh, B. (2011). Determining the Socio-Cultural Stability Factors in the Design of Cold and Dry Climate Residential Complexes in Iran (Case Study: Ardabil), Abadi, (34), 98-105.
  51. Zavadskas E.K., Turskis Z., Antucheviciene J. & Tamosaitiene J. (2007). Assessment of Individual Residential buildings External Walla Alternatives Applying TOPSIS Method, 9th International Conference in Modern  Building  Materials,  Structures, Vilnius, Lithuania.
  52. Zyound S.H. & Fuchs-Hanusch D. (2017). A Bibliometric-based Survey on AHP and TOPSIS Techniques, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 78, No. 15, pp. 158-181.
معماری و شهرسازی ایران(JIAU)
دوره 12، شماره 2
دی 1400
صفحه 217-234
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 05 فروردین 1398
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 28 مرداد 1398
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 03 خرداد 1399
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار