نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

2 دانشیار، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

3 استادیار، دانشکده پژوهش‌های عالی هنر و کارآفرینی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

بافت‌های تاریخی مزیت نسبی شهرهای کهن هستند که در رویکردهای رقابت‌پذیری شهری توانایی جذب سرمایه‌های انسانی و اقتصادی را دارند؛ اما هنگامی این مزیت تبدیل به مزیت رقابتی می‌شود که برند مکان توانایی خلق تصویر یگانه ارزشمند را در ذهن ذی‌نفعان خود داشته باشد. هرگونه برنامه‌ریزی و طراحی در راستای ارتقا برند مکان، نیازمند شناسایی دقیق وضع موجود و ادراک ذی‌نفعان مکان است؛ در این میان بررسی تصویر ذهنی ذی‌نفعان داخلی مکان اعم از ساکنان، صاحبان کسب و کار و شهروندان که تعیین کننده برند درونی بافت است بسیار حائز اهمیت می‌باشد؛ زیرا تا بافت شهری برای ذی‌نفعان داخلی خود نتواند ارزش‌آفرینی، خلق تصویر مثبت و رضایت خاطر ایجاد کند در جلب رضایت ذی نفع خارجی اعم از گردشگران و سرمایه‌گذاران نیز ناموفق است. از این رو این مطالعه با هدف بررسی برند درونی بافت‌ تاریخی شهر اصفهان با روش نظریۀ زمینه‌ای استراوس و کربین، تصویر ذهنی ذی‌نفعان داخلی با انجام مصاحبه‌های عمیق از 245 نفر در پنج محله تاریخی جوباره، دردشت، جلفا، تخت فولاد و نقش جهان مورد بررسی و تحلیل قرار گفت. دستاورد این پژوهش حاکی از آن است که تصویر برند بافت تاریخی شهر اصفهان از منظر ذی‌نفعان داخلی، متشکل از جذابیت‌های میراث ملموس و ناملموس فرهنگی، سازگاری اجتماعی در مقابل تعارض اجتماعی، گونه فعالیت‌های اقتصادی و تعامل اجتماعی است که عواملی مانند مسائل کالبدی، اجتماعی آن را تحت تأثیر قرار می‌دهد و بر میزان تمایل به بافت در جنبه‌های مختلفی نظیر سکونت، سرمایه‌گذاری و بازدید و گذراندن اوقات فراغت در بافت اثر می‌گذارد و به دنبال آن، در برخی محله‌های تاریخی منجر به رکود اقتصادی، عدم سرزندگی اجتماعی و خروج سرمایه از بافت می‌شود. تصویر ذهنی غالب مخاطبان در محله جوباره بر اساس هویت اجتماعی آن و سکونت کلیمیان، در محله جلفا بر هویت اجتماعی و اقتصادی محله اعم از سکونت ارامنه و فعالیت‌های سرگرمی و تفریحی و خرید، در محله دردشت بر هویت فرهنگی ملموس و ناملموس اعم از مناسبت‌های مذهبی و بناهای تاریخی، در محله نقش جهان بر هویت فرهنگی و اقتصادی شامل شکوه و عظمت میدان نقش جهان و وجود بازار بزرگ صنایع دستی اصفهان و در محله تخت فولاد بر هویت فرهنگی آئینی مبنی بر مراسم و آئین‌های مذهبی شکل گرفته است.

چکیده تصویری

تحلیل تصویر برند درونی بافت تاریخی شهر اصفهان

تازه های تحقیق

- تحلیل برند درونی بافت تاریخی اصفهان با رویکرد اجتماع محور برند.
- انتخاب ذی‌نفعان داخلی اعم از ساکنان، صاحبان کسب و کار و شهروندان برای شناسایی ساختار تصویر برند بافت تاریخی اصفهان.
- استفاده از روش کیفی نظریة زمینه‌ای برای تدوین ساختار ادراکی ذی‌نفعان داخلی برند بافت تاریخی اصفهان.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of the Internal Brand Image of the Historical Context of Isfahan

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hajar Nasei Isfahani 1
  • Mahin Nastaran 2
  • Rasoul Bidram 3

1 Ph.D. in Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Development, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Associate professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Development, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Assistant professor, Faculty of Research Excellence in Art and Entrepreneurship, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Historical contexts are the relative advantage of old cities, which can attract both human and economic capital in urban competitiveness approaches. However, this advantage becomes a competitive one when the place brand can create a unique valuable image in the minds of its stakeholders. Therefore, any planning and designing to promote the brand of the place requires accurate identification of the current situation and perception of the beneficiaries of that place. Consequently, it is very important to examine the mental image of the internal stakeholders of that place, including residents, business owners, and citizens, all of which determine the internal brand of the context. The urban context is only successful in satisfying external stakeholders, including tourists and investors, once it creates value, a positive image, or satisfaction for its internal stakeholders. Therefore, this study was first conducted to investigate the perception of the internal brand of the historical context of Isfahan and to know what factors shape the mentality of internal stakeholders in the perception of the brand of the historical context of Isfahan and also what the current status of its brand image is.
Methods: The methodology used is organized and implemented based on the grounded theory of Strauss and Corbin. Considering this theory, recognition of the phenomenon or the presentation of the theory comes from the data collected. Based on their systematic collection and analysis, it is rooted in the conceptual data. The purpose of a grounded theory is to provide an abstract analytical framework for a process, action, or interaction. Based on this fact, in this research, the emotions, feelings, and behavior of the internal stakeholders in the context are investigated using open-ended qualitative interviews. The data gathered is used to analyze and interpret the perception of the context for discovering their concepts and relations and organize them in the form of a necessary theoretical explanatory plan. Therefore, by conducting in-depth interviews with 245 people in five historical neighborhoods of Jubareh Dardasht, Jolfa, Takht-e Foulad, and Naqsh-e Jahan, the internal image of the place brand was investigated and analyzed. 
Findings: The data gathered helped us extract 72 key concepts and 19 main categories. The results indicate that the brand image of the historical context of Isfahan -from the stakeholders’ internal point of view- is consisted of tangible and intangible cultural heritage attractions, social compatibility versus social conflict, economic activities, and social interaction that is affected by factors such as physical and social issues. These involve the degree of desire to reach the context in various aspects, such as residence, investment, and visiting and spending leisure time. However, in some historic neighborhoods, it leads to economic stagnation, lack of social vitality, and capital withdrawal. The dominant mental image of the audience in Jubareh neighborhood is based on its social identity and the Jewish residence. In Jolfa neighborhood, it is based on the social and economic identity of the Armenian population. The entertainment and leisure activities and shopping in Dardasht neighborhood are considered because of its tangible and intangible cultural identity, including religious occasions and historical monuments. In Naqsh-e Jahan neighborhood, it is based on its cultural and economic identity, including its great square and large handicrafts market. And finally, in Takht-e Foulad neighborhood, in its ritual religious, cultural ceremonies, and identity.
Conclusion: In a comparative study of the related literature review with the findings of this grounded theory research, the conceptual model of the internal brand image creation of the historical context of Isfahan indicates two stages of cognitive factors and emotional factors. The cognitive stage includes tangible and intangible cultural heritage attractions, economic activities, social and physical issues, structural capital of urban management, and local lifestyle. The emotional stage also indicates interaction and adaptation versus social conflict, stakeholders’ religious values on the one hand, and the manifestation of religious values in the place. On the other hand, belonging to the context versus not belonging and the existence and symbolic human capital causes motivation or lack of motivation to participate in the context. These two stages create an attitude of the place in the mind of the stakeholders that leads to the process of creation of the brand image in the behavioral stage. Then, based on the interests of the stakeholders, willingness or unwillingness to live, invest, spend leisure time, do shopping, and visit is manifested, and of course, it is associated with the existence or lack of economic and human capital, economic and social vitality in the context.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mental Image
  • Internal Brand
  • Local Stakeholders
  • the Historical Fabric of Isfahan

این مقاله برگرفته از رساله دکتری نویسنده نخست با عنوان «تدوین مدل مفهومی ارزش‌افزایی بافت تاریخی با رویکرد برندسازی مکان (نمونه مورد مطالعه: بافت تاریخی اصفهان)» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و سوم در دانشگاه هنر اصفهان انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s doctoral thesis entitled “Developing a Conceptual Model of Synergizing Value for Historical Fabrics Based on the Place Branding Approach (Case Study: Isfahan City Historical Fabric)”, supervised by the second and third authors, at Art University of Isfahan.

  1. Aker, David A (1996). Building strong brands. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  2. Alalhesabi, M.Moradi, Gh. (2020). Theoretical Analysis of the Relationship between Urban Image Components and Urban Branding. Bagh-e Nazar, 17(83), 73-86.
  3. Anholt, S. (2011). Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions. Translated by Mustafa Akbari Mutlaq, Mojtaba Shakri Roshan and Mohammad Saleh Sharifi. Mashhad: Tahan Publications.
  4. Anholt, Simon (2007). Competitive Identity: the new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
  5. Anttiroiko, Ari-Veikko (2014). City Branding as a Response to Global Intercity Competition. GROWTH AND CHANGE.
  6. Ashworth, G. J. and Voogd, H. (1994) ‘Marketing and place promotion’, in Gold, J. R. and Ward, S. V. (eds) ‘Place Promotion: The Use of Publicity and Marketing to Sell Towns and Regions’, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  7. Behzadfar, M. (2013), City Identity (A Look at the Identity of Tehran City), Tehran Press.
  8. Blaikie, N. (2014) Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation. Translated by Hasan Chavoshian. Tehran: Ney Publications.
  9. Boisen, Martin, Terlouw, Kees, Groote, Peter & Couwenberg, Oscar (2017). Reframing place promotion, place marketing, and place branding – moving beyond conceptual confusion. Cities. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.021
  10. Castillo-Villar, Fernando Rey (2018). City branding and the theory of social representation. Journal of Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 28 (1): 33 - 38
  11. Creswell, J.W. (2015). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Translated by Hasan Danaei Fard. Tehran: Saffar.
  12. Dinnie, K. (2016). City branding. Translated by Azim Fazlipour. Tehran: Specialists Without Borders Publications.
  13. Eshuis, Jasper, Klijn, Erik-Hans, & Braun, Erik. (2014). Place marketing and citizen participation: branding as strategy to address the emotional dimension of policy making? International Review Administrative Sciences, 80(1), 151-171.
  14. Fakouhi, N. (2005). History of Anthropological Thought and Theories; 2003, Tehran: Ney Publications.
  15. Gogana, Luminita Maria, Durana, Dan Cristian & Draghici, Anca. Structural capital - A proposed measurement model. Journal of Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1139 – 1146
  16. Govers, R. and Go, F. (2009) Place Branding: Glocal, Virtual and Physical Identities, Constructed, Imagined and Experienced. Palgrave, Basingstoke: 17
  17. Hubbard, P. and Hall, T. (1998) ‘The entrepreneurial city and the new urban politics’, in Hall, T. and Hubbard, P. ‘The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation’, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  18. Insch, A. (2011). Branding the city as an attractive place to live. In K. Dinnie (Ed.), City branding: Theory and cases (pp. 8-14). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Isfahan Municipality (2020). Isfahan city statistics for 1998, second chapter: Population. Isfahan: Isfahan Municipal Publications.
  20. Joo, Yu-Min & Seo, Bokyong (2017). Transformative city branding for policy change: The case of Seoul’s participatory branding. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 1–19.
  21. Kavaratzis, M. (2004). From city marketing to city branding: Towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Journal of Place Branding, 1 (1), 58-73.
  22. Keller, K.L. (1993) “Conceptualizing, Measuring and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No.1, pp.1–22.
  23. Koller, Veronika (2008). “The world in one city” Semiotic and cognitive aspects of city branding. Journal of Language and Politics 7:3, 431–450.
  24. Melović, Boban, Mitrović, Slavica & Djokaj, Arton (2017). CITY-BRAND BUILDING – FROM CITY MARKETING TO CITY BRANDING. Paper presented at the 6th Scientific Conference with International Participation ‘’Jahorina Business Forum 2017: Strategic choice and sustainable development of tourist destinations’’, Jahorina, 23-24th February 2017.
  25. Merrilees, Bill, Miller, Dale & Herington, Carmel (2012).  Multiple stakeholders and multiple city brand meanings. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46, 1032 – 1047.
  26. Mohammadpour, Ahmad (2013), Anti-Method: Qualitative Research Methodology, Vol1 (Logic and Design in Qualitative Methodology). Tehran: Sociologists Publications.
  27. Nourian, F. &  mikaeili, M. (2018). Modeling the city’s image in order to determine the priorities of city branding case study: Urmia City. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 23(1), 31-40.
  28. Paliaga, Marko. 2007. Branding i konkurentnost gradova. Rovinj:MPS d.o.o.
  29. Senobari, M. (2009). An introduction to human capital: concepts, characteristics and measurement indicators. Police Human Development Bimonthly, Vol. 8, No. 22, 136-120.
  30. Sevin, H. Efe (2014). Understanding cities through city brands: City branding as a social and semantic network. Cities Journal, 38, 47-56.
  31. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (2016). Basics of qualitative research, techniques and stages of producing grounded theory. Translated by Ibrahim Afshar. Tehran: Ney Publications.
  32. Vuignier, Renaud (2016). Place marketing and place branding: A systematic (and tentatively exhaustive) literature review. University of Lausanne, Switzerland.