نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای معماری، گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

با افزایش جمعیت شهرها و احداث مجتمع‌های مسکونی، امروزه فضاهای باز در مجتمع‌های مسکونی جایگزین حیاط درخانه‌های سنتی شده‌اند. فضاهای باز همواره عملکردهای متنوعی در بناهای مسکونی داشته و پاسخگو بودن این فضاها به نیازهای مختلف فردی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی ساکنین از اهمیت خاصی برخوردار است. هدف این پژوهش مشخص کردن مؤلفه‌های مؤثر برکیفیت فضاهای باز مسکونی شهر تبریز، از نظر بوم شناسی فرهنگی است که با روش تحلیلی - توصیفی و موردی انجام شده است. بخشی از اطلاعات کیفی مورد نیاز با رجوع به منابع اسنادی و کتابخانه‌ای و بخش دیگر از طریق پرسشنامه و مشاهده، گردآوری شده است. در این تحقیق تعداد پنج نمونه از بناهای مسکونی شهر تبریز به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شده و فضاهای باز از سه جنبه کالبدی، احساسی و ادراکی از نظر ساکنین مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. برای سنجش پایایی و روایی تحقیق از روش AVE و CR و برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از مقایسه میانگین و انحراف معیار و بررسی همبستگی استفاده شد. یافته‌های تحقیق مؤید این است که شاخص‌های کالبدی - کارکردی و احساسی نقش مؤثری در افزایش کیفیت فضاهای باز ایفا کرده و بین شاخص‌های مذکور رابطه‌ای مستقیم وجود دارد. در مورد ارتباط شاخص‌های کالبدی، ادراکی، احساسی با توجه به یافته‌های تحقیق می‌توان نتیجه‌گیری کرد که سازمان و ساختار کالبدی و همچنین فعالیت‌ها (شاخص‌های کالبدی) بر روی تصور و ادراک افراد از فضاهای باز بناهای مسکونی تأثیر می‌گذارند (شاخص‌های ادراکی)، ولی توانایی خلق مفاهیم احساسی و اجتماعی برای ساکنین است (شاخص‌های احساسی) که به فضاهای باز هویت فرهنگی می‌بخشد. توجه به نمادها و نشانه‌های فرهنگی و حافظه تاریخی ساکنین، وجود عناصر طبیعی مانند آب و فضای سبز، تعریف مرزهای مشخص میان عرصه و اعیان ساختمان و خوانایی فضاهای باز، در ارتقاء کیفیت محیطی و فرهنگی فضاهای باز مسکونی بسیار مؤثر هستند. 

چکیده تصویری

شناسایی مؤلفه‌های کیفی مؤثر بر فضاهای باز مسکونی بر اساس بوم‌شناسی فرهنگی؛ مطالعه موردی: بناهای مسکونی شهر تبریز

تازه های تحقیق

- مؤلفه‌های کالبدی - کارکردی و مؤلفه‌های احساسی، در افزایش کیفیت فضاهای باز نقش مؤثری ایفا می‌کنند.
- توجه به نمادها و نشانه‌های فرهنگی و حافظه تاریخی ساکنین در کنار توجه به حس امنیت، سرزندگی و نشاط، موجب تقویت وجه فرهنگی فضاهای باز مسکونی می‌گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing the Impact of Qualitative Components Affecting Residential Open Space Based on Cultural Ecology; Case study: Residential Buildings in Tabriz

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sahel Ghasemi Baghdadi 1
  • Mozayan Dehbashi Sharif 2
  • Mohammadreza Pourzagar 2

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: In traditional Iranian architecture, the courtyard serves an important purpose of providing a secure and private space for family activities. This is based on cultural and ritual practices that prioritize creating an enclosed and protected environment that is not visible to outsiders. Based on the definition of the relationship between open spaces and closed spaces, Iran’s traditional residential architecture is classified into two types: extrovert and introvert. In both extroverted and introverted types, the formation and quality of open spaces have been affected by natural conditions and social and cultural factors. During the second Pahlavi period from 1961 to 1971, the construction of modern houses and residential complexes became popular in Iran, which ultimately caused a complete transformation in the relationship between open and closed spaces in Iranian residential architecture, and as a result, the role and function of open spaces in residential buildings changed completely. Compared to traditional housing, the nature and function of open spaces in modern residential buildings has undergone significant changes. In traditional housing, open spaces were meant for communication with nature and provided a secure and private area for family activities. Therefore, this research deals with the qualitative investigation of open spaces and the identification of the relationship between culture and the environment in residential open spaces, and the analysis of residential buildings in Tabriz city.
Methods: This study has an applied purpose and its methodology is based on a descriptive-analytical approach. The information required to extract the theoretical framework and identify the components affecting the open spaces of the residential building was collected using the bibliographic and document method. Moreover, in order to collect the required data in the field studies, two methods of questionnaire and observation were used. To evaluate the open spaces of residential buildings from the perspective of residents of Tabriz city, a questionnaire was designed based on a five-point Likert scale. Taking into account the statistics published by Iran Statistics Center, the number of households in Tabriz is 563,660, of which 518,187 live in Tabriz. Therefore, the statistical population of this research is equal to 518,187 people, assuming that every household owns a house. Taking into account the number of households living in the sample areas, which is equal to 1634 people, and the people who were able to answer the questionnaire, the sample size was calculated using Cochran’s formula, and the questionnaire was distributed among 196 residents. The sample spaces of the research were selected purposefully and according to three different models of current urban housing in Tabriz city. These three patterns are: apartment (south-north), residential complex, and tower. AVE and CR methods were used to measure the reliability and validity of the research.
Findings: The physical components of the study were evaluated and the top six indicators with an average score of more than 3 were identified as follows: 1) enjoyment (3.92), 2) signs (3.53), 3) intersections (3.49), 4) natural elements (3.46), 5) pollution (3.42), and 6) boundaries (3.02). Additionally, in the section related to perceptual components, the two indicators of mobility and unreal spaces had the highest average of 3.46 and 3.36, respectively. In terms of emotional components, the results analysis showed that only the precognition index had an average higher than 3, while the excitement index had an average of 2.99, which is close to the centrality index. Comparing the total average of the indicators across the three components, it can be concluded that the physical component with a total average of 2.98 is ranked first, followed by the emotional component with a total average of 2.25, and finally the perceptual component with a total average of 1.85 ranked last.
Conclusion: The main users of this research, which aim to identify the factors that influence the quality of residential open spaces from a cultural ecology perspective, are architects and landscape designers. The research findings offer valuable insights for these professionals to enhance the open spaces of residential environments. Considering that a complete framework for evaluating and measuring the quality of open spaces in residential buildings has not yet been defined, one of the main achievements of this research is to empower experts and designers to better understand the environmental and cultural characteristics of open spaces in residential buildings; which will be effective in increasing the quality of open spaces in the house. This research showed that physical-functional components and emotional components play an effective role in increasing the quality of open spaces and there is a direct relationship between the aforementioned components. According to residents, the quality of residential open spaces is greatly affected by the physical-functional structure (physical indicators) and cultural identity is created by paying attention to emotional and social concepts (emotional indicators) in residential open spaces. Giving consideration to cultural symbols, signs, and historical memory of residents, as well as ensuring a sense of security, liveliness, and vibrancy, can enhance the cultural aspect of open spaces in residential areas.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Open Space
  • Residential Buildings
  • Tabriz Architecture
  • Culture
  • Ecology

 این مقاله برگرفته از رساله دکتری نویسنده نخست با عنوان «ارائه مدل ارتقاء کیفی فضاهای باز ابنیه مسکونی از دیدگاه بوم‌شناسی فرهنگی در استان آذربایجان شرقی (شهر تبریز)» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و مشاوره نویسنده سوم در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s doctoral thesis entitled “Presentation Qualitative Improvement of Residential Buildings’ Open Spaces Model through Cultural Ecology in Eastern Azerbaijan Province (Tabriz City)”, supervised by the second author and advised by the third, at Islamic Azad University Tehran Central Branch.

  1. Alehashemi, Ayda. (2014). Uses of open spaces in large-scale residential complexes in Tehran: Arman Shahr, 7 (13). 1-12.
  2. Amid, Hassan. (2007). Amid's Persian culture. Tehran: Amir Kabir.
  3. Ardakani, Mohammad Reza. (2015). Ecology. Tehran: University of Tehran Printing and Publishing Institute.
  4. Ataei Hamedani, M. & Shali Amini, V. & Hamzehnejad, M. & Nowruz Barazjani, V. (2016). Reinterpreting the Iranian courtyard based on the theory of cultural ecology. Urban Management, 16 (49). 431 - 451.
  5. Batista, D. & Mato. (2013). Ecology and ethics: landscape architecture and sustainability. Scientific Conference.
  6. Bell, Simon. (2012). Landscape - model, perception and process. (B, Aminzade, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran.
  7. Bentley, Ian. (2012). Responsive environments (guide for designers). (M, Behzadfar. Trans.). Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology.
  8. Choua, S.W. & Chen, P.Y. (2009). The Influence of Individual Differences on Continuance Intentions of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP). International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 67 (6). 484 – 496.
  9. Daeipour, Zeinab. (2013). The relationship between the presence of nature and increasing the sense of belonging in traditional Iranian houses. Bagh Nazar Journal, 11(30), Autumn. 49-58.
  10. Danshpour, SA. & Charkhchian, M. & Sepehri Moghaddam, M. (2008). Explaining the model of attachment to place and examining its different elements and dimensions. Journal of Fine Arts, Architecture and Urbanism, 1(38). 37 -48.
  11. Dehkhoda, Ali Akbar. (1999). Dictionary, second edition; Tehran: University of Tehran.
  12. Descola, P. & Palsson, G. (1996). Nature and Society, anthropological perspectives: Routledge publisher.
  13. Einifar, A. & Ghazizadeh, SN. (2009). Typology of residential complexes in Tehran with open space criteria. Armanshahr Architecture and Urbanism, 3(5). 35 - 45.
  14. Fakuhi, Naser. (2007). History of thought and theories of anthropology. Tehran: Ney Publishing.
  15. Fakuhi, Naser. (2011). Basics of anthropology. Tehran: Ney Publishing.
  16. Garbarino, Mervin (1998). Anthropological theories. (A, Mohammadi Asl. Trans.). Tehran: Avaye - Noor Publisher.
  17. Gharehbeiglu, M. & Khaleghi Moghaddam, N. (2015). Residential Complex Typology, an Effective Step in High-quality design of the contemporary residential complexes case study: residential complexes of Tabriz city, Architecture and Urban Plannig Journal, 14, 117 – 139.
  18. Ghazizadeh, Neda. (2011). The effect of open space design of the residential complex in creating a sense of attachment to the place. Tehran: University of Tehran Fine Arts Campus.
  19. Gifford, Robert. (1999). Psychology of residential environments. (V, Ghobadian. Trans.). Architecture and Culture Quarterly, 1 (2 - 3) 71.
  20. Haddad Adel, Gholam Ali. (2001). Encyclopaedia of the Islamic World. Volume 6, Publisher: Islamic Encyclopedia Foundation.
  21. Hardesty, Donald L. (1977). Ecological Anthropology, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Hauge, C. & Jenkins, P. (2005). Place Identity, Participation and Planning, Rutledge publisher.
  23. Jalili, M. & Einifar A. & Talischi G. (2012). Open spaces of residential complexes and environmental response, Journal of Fine Arts - Architecture and Urban Planning, (4) 18. 57-68.
  24. Khakpour, M. & Ansari, M. & Sheikh Mehdi, A. & Tavousi, M. (2014). Consensus - cultural characteristics of native housing. Housing and Village Environment Quarterly, 37 (163). 19-23.
  25. Kiani, Mustafa (1996). The formation process of Pahlavi I architecture. Proceedings of the Congress of History of Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran, third volume, Cultural Heritage Organization of the country.
  26. Kianpour, Zahra (2012). Designing a residential complex in Tehran's 22nd district with an emphasis on environmental quality considerations. Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Unit.
  27. Lawrence, J. (2005). The House Living Room, Oxford: Blackwell.
  28. Mahdavinejad, J. & Mansoorpour, M. & Hadianpour, M. (2013). The role of the courtyard in contemporary Iranian architecture: a case study of the Qajar and Pahlavi periods. Iranian-Islamic City Studies Quarterly, 1(15). 35-45.
  29. Masoumi, M. & Mir Khatib, A. (2016). Investigating the effect of designing open spaces of residential complexes in creating a sense of attachment to the place. Geographical Research Quarterly, 32(3). 52-73.
  30. Memarian, Gholamhossein (2005). Familiarity with residential architecture. Extroverted typology, Science and Industry University Press, Iran.
  31. Miri, SH. & Shakerizadeh Abianeh A. (2010). From Bardieh to Sarieh. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press.
  32. Mir Muqtadaei, Mahta (2009). Criteria for measuring the possibility of forming, recording and transferring collective memories in the city. Fine Arts Journal, Building and Housing Research Center, 37. 5-16.
  33. Naghizadeh, Mohammad (2012). A reflection on the basics of Iranian Islamic housing. Book of Art Month, No. 170. 38-55.
  34. Norberg Schultz, Christian (2004). The concept of dwelling towards an allegorical architecture. (M, Amir Yarahmadi. Trans.). Tehran: Agah Publications.
  35. Pakzad, Jahanshah. (2014). The flow of ideas in urban planning from space to place. Third edition. Tehran: Arman Shahr.
  36. Pallasmaa, Juhani. (2014). The eyes of the: Architecture and Sensory Perceptions. (R, Qods. Trans.). second edition, Parham Naqsh Publishing House, Tehran.
  37. Qareh Biglo, N. & Khaleghi Moghadam ,N. (2014). Typology of residential complexes, an effective step in the quality design of contemporary residential complexes (case study: Tabriz residential complexes). Architecture and Urbanism Journal, No. 14. 117-139.
  38. Rapoport, Amos (2002). Towards an anthropology of the house. (M, Parkhami Iraqi. Eds.). Abadi publication, 36. 6-11.
  39. Rapoport, Amos (2009). Anthropology of housing. (K, Afzalian. Trans.). Tehran: Herfeh – Honarmand puplisher.
  40. Saremi, Ali Akbar. (1997). Rebuilding the architecture of the past and opening with the inspiration of the past. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 3 (16).
  41. Sattarpour, M. & Bemanian, MR. & Saremi, HR. (2019). Explanation of vitality components in the design of traditional residential spaces (traditional fabric of Tabriz). Quarterly Journal of Geography (Regional Planning), 10 (1 - 2). 407-420.
  42. Seifian, Mohammad Kazem. (2008). The topics of the lesson on desirable housing. Tehran: Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Unit.
  43. Shoarinejad, Ali Akbar. (2006). Culture of behavioral sciences. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishers.
  44. Steward, J. (2005). Theory of Culture Change: The Methodology of Multilinear Evolution. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  45. Sultanzadeh, Hossein. (2011). The role of geography in the formation of courtyards in traditional Iranian houses. Human Geography Research, 43 (75). 69 - 86.
  46. The role of the environment, consulting engineers. (2012). Development and construction (comprehensive) plan of Tabriz city. The fourth volume, General Administration of Roads and Urban Development of East Azarbaijan Provinc