تبیین راهکارهای حفاظتی مبتنی بر شناخت و آسیب‌شناسی ارزشی بازار تاریخی تبریز با تاکید بر توسعه گردشگری میراثی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای معماری، گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران.

چکیده
بازارهای تاریخی به عنوان مهم‌ترین پدیده‌های موثر در شکل‌گیری شهرهای ایرانی طیف وسیعی از ارزش‌های به هم پیوسته را دربرمی‌گیرند. ارزش‌های منسوب به آن‌ها می‌توانند نقش عمده‌ای در جهت حفاظت و توسعه گردشگری ایفا نمایند. با این وجود، عدم حفاظت شایسته از این میراث، بستر آسیب و انحطاط برخی از ارزش‌ها و به تبع آن کاهش سطح گردشگری را فراهم ساخته است. از این روی مطالعه حاضر درصدد تبیین راهکارهای حفاظتی مبتنی بر شناخت و آسیب‌شناسی ارزش‌های ملموس بازار تبریز با تاکید بر تقویت گردشگری میراثی برآمده است. رویکرد روش‌شناسی تحقیق، آمیخته و شیوه‌ی گردآوری داده‌ها، کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی بوده است. گروه‌های آماری پرسشنامه را گردشگران و شهروندان با حجمی معادل 384 نفر و جامعه‌ی مصاحبه‌شونده را30 کسبه و 15 تن از متخصصان تشکیل می‌دهند. ارزیابی داده‌های پرسشنامه با نرم‌افزار SPSS و تحلیل داده‌های مصاحبه بر اساس تحلیل محتوا و رویه کدگذاری و مقوله‌بندی انجام پذیرفت. نتایج آماره (t) موید آن است که در متغیر «ارزش شهری»، وضعیت کلیه شاخص‌ها به جز عامل نقش شهری با میزان معناداری کمتر از 05/0 نامطلوب شناخته شد. در متغیر «ارزش معماری»، تنها شاخصِ «سازگاری» با مقدار معناداری بالاتر از 05/0 و t منفی، در شرایط نامطلوب قرار دارد. شاخص‌های «ارزش زیبایی‌شناسی» با سطح معناداری کمتر از 05/0 و t مثبت، از وضعیت مناسب‌تری برخوردار می‌باشند. نتایج منتج از مصاحبه بر یافته‌های آماری صحه گذاشته و نشان می‌دهد که غالب ارزش‌های فعلی بازار متعلق به ارزش‌های زیبایی‌شناسی بوده و بسیاری از ارزش‌های سابق شهری و معماری این مجموعه میراثی دچار آسیب جدی گردیده است.

چکیده تصویری

تبیین راهکارهای حفاظتی مبتنی بر شناخت و آسیب‌شناسی ارزشی بازار تاریخی تبریز با تاکید بر توسعه گردشگری میراثی

تازه های تحقیق

- میراث ارزشمند معماری نقش موثری در توسعه صنعت گردشگری خاصه گردشگری میراثی ایفا می‌کنند.
- احیای ارزش‌های آسیب‌دیده بازار تاریخی تبریز می‌تواند بستر توسعه گردشگری میراثی را در شهر تبریز فراهم سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Explanation of protection strategies for the historical bazaar of Tabriz based on value pathology recognition with emphasis on heritage tourism development

نویسندگان English

Parisa Aberoumand Azar 1
Shabnam Akbari Namdar 2
Nima Valizadeh 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture, Faculty of Arts & Architecture, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Arts & Architecture, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: The historical bazaar is a critical and effective element in the formation of Iranian cities and represents a wide array of interconnected values. These values play a significant role in both the preservation of the bazaar and the development and promotion of tourism. However, insufficient protection of this heritage has led to the deterioration of some of its values, which, in turn, has resulted in a decline in tourism. Therefore, this study aims to explain protection strategies by recognizing and addressing the pathology of the essential values of the historical Tabriz Bazaar, with a focus on developing heritage tourism.
Methods: This research uses a mixed-methodology approach, with data collection conducted in both theoretical and practical dimensions, based on bibliographic and field studies. The theoretical aspect involved gathering data on key concepts such as architectural heritage, heritage values, and heritage tourism through a review of scientific literature, analysis of documents and international conventions, and examining the intellectual frameworks of scholars in the field of value protection of historical-cultural heritage. This was aimed at developing a conceptual model for understanding the subject. In the practical aspect, a questionnaire and interviews were used to measure and evaluate factors and variables derived from the theoretical framework. The statistical sample for the questionnaire comprised 384 tourists and citizens visiting the Tabriz Bazaar over a one-year period, selected using simple random sampling. Additionally, interviews were conducted with 30 business owners and 15 knowledgeable experts, chosen based on theoretical data saturation.
Findings: Quantitative data from the questionnaires were analyzed using SPSS statistical software, inferential t-tests, and exploratory data analysis. Interviews were analyzed using content analysis, coding, and categorization. The results showed that, under the “urban value” variable, all indicators except for the urban role factor were found to be in unfavorable conditions, with a significance level of less than 0.05. For the “architectural value” variable, only the “compatibility” index had a significance value above 0.05 and a negative t-value, indicating unfavorable conditions. Indicators of “aesthetic value” showed better conditions, with a significance level below 0.05 and a positive t-value. Overall, the findings suggest that aesthetic values have experienced the least damage compared to other values, while urban values have suffered the most, with many urban development capabilities of the bazaar severely damaged or lost due to contemporary developments. Architectural values have also been impacted, though the damage was less severe compared to urban values. From the interviews, 160 codes related to tangible heritage values and 50 codes related to damages were identified. After categorization and removing duplicates, the codes were reduced to 118 and 22, respectively.
Conclusion: The interview results also confirmed the statistical findings, revealing that most of the remaining values of the bazaar are aesthetic, while many of the original urban and architectural values have suffered significant damage and continue to decline. If these issues are not addressed, these values will gradually deteriorate. The conclusion outlines practical solutions and recommendations for protecting and restoring the damaged urban, architectural, and aesthetic values of the Tabriz Bazaar by verifying the type of damage caused by the tangible valuesof the Tabriz Bazaar. It is expected that those working in architectural heritage protection will give greater consideration to the preservation and continuity of these historical-cultural identities, in light of the achievements and findings from studies in this field, to ensure that key heritage tourism sites in the region are not destroyed.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Architectural Heritage
Value Protection
Bazaar of Tabriz
Heritage Values
Heritage Tourism

این مقاله برگرفته از رساله دکتری نویسنده نخست با عنوان «بازشناسی ارزش‌های محلی درهم پیوندی محیط و کالبد بازارهای سنتی از منظر روانشناسی محیط (نمونه موردی: بازار سنتی تبریز)» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و مشاوره نویسنده سوم در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تبریز انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s doctoral thesis entitled “Recognition of local values of interconnection of environment and body in traditional Bazars from environmental psychology point of view (Case study: Traditional Tabriz Bazar)”, supervised by the second author and advised by the third, at Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch.

  1. Abbas Zadeh, Mozafar. (2016). The role of architectural heritage values in conservation and restoration (case study: World Heritage Collection of Takht Suleiman), Ph.D thesis of Architecture, Tehran university of science & technology, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, [In Persian]
  2. Abbaszadeh, Mozafar & Aysham, Masoumeh. (2017). Defining the historical, cultural and tourism axis In the old context of Urmia city (case study: Mahdi al-Gadam neighborhood), jostarhaie shahrsazi, 48, 97-114, [In Persian]
  3. Abbaszadeh, Mozafar, Mohammad Moradi, Asghar, Sultan Ahmadi, Elnaz. (2015). The role of architectural and urban heritage values In the development of cultural tourism, (case study: Historical context of Urmia), Motaleate Shahri, 14, 77-90, [In Persian]
  4. Aberoumand Azar, Parisa, Akbari Namdar, Shabnam, Valizadeh, Nima. (2022). The Role of Cultural Tourism in Reviving Socio-Cultural Values of Tabriz Historical Bazaar, Urban Tourism, 9(3), [In Persian]
  5. Abizade, Elnaz. (2018). Investigating the Factors affecting the sense of place Tabriz Historic Bazaar  in line semantic and value protection of architectural heritage. PH.D Thesis of Islamic Architecture, Islamic Art University of Tabriz, Faculty of Architecture & Urbanism, [In Persian]
  6. Albaqawy, G. A., Alnaim, M. M., Bay, M. A., Touahmia, M. (2023). Assessment of Saudi Arabia's Classification and Selection Criteria for Heritage Sites: A Case Study of Barzan Heritage Area in Hail City. Sustainability, 15(3), 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031015
  7. Androudi, Elham. & Taghipour Anari, Zainab. (2018). Evaluation of values in the historical urban landscape of Vali-Asr Street, Tehran with Using geographic information system of the People's participation, Architecture and Urbanism  (Fine Arts), 23(2), 75-86, [In Persian]
  8. Araoz, G.F. (2008). World-Heritage Urban Landscapes: Defining and Protecting Authenticity. APT Bulletin, The Journal of Preservation Technology, Association for Preservation Technology International, 39(2-3), 33-37.
  9. Australia ICOMOS. (1999). The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance (Burra Charter). Burra. Retrieved from https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/BURRA_CHARTER.pdf
  10. Avrami, E., Mason, R., De La Torre, M. (2000). Values and heritage conservation. Getty Conservation Institute.
  11. Azzopardi, E., Farrugia, N., Deguara, R., Mifsud Bonnici, J. P. (2022). What are heritage values? Integrating natural and cultural heritage into environmental valuation. People and Nature, 4(1), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10386
  12. Chang, Q. (2014). Envisioning historic place: Urban and rural architectural heritage conservation field at Tongji University. Tongji University Press.
  13. Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E. H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The Qualitative Report, 19(32), 1-20.
  14. De La Torre, M. (2002). Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.
  15. Douglas-Jones, R., Hughes, J. J., Jones, S., Yarrow, T. (2016). Science, value and material decay in the conservation of historic environments. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 21, 823-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.03.008
  16. Drury, P., & McPherson, A. (2008). Conservation principles: Policies and guidance for the sustainable management of the historic environment. English Heritage.
  17. English Heritage. (2008). Conservation principles policies and guidance—for the sustainable management of the historic environment. Historic England.
  18. Feilden, B. (2003). Conservation of historic buildings. Architectural Press.
  19. Feilden, M. B., & Jokilehto, J. (2007). Management guidelines for world cultural heritages sites. (P. Hanachi, Trans.). University of Tehran Press.
  20. Flamaki, Mohammad Mansour. (2006). Farabi and The course of citizenship in Iran, Tehran, Faza Scientific and Cultural Institute, [In Persian]
  21. Getty Conservation Institute, World Monuments Fund. (2010). Middle Eastern Geodatabase for Antiquities (MEGA)—Jordan: Guidelines for completing site cards. Unpublished.
  22. Gharebiglou, Mino, Melabi, Qasim, Saman, Saba. (2019). Recognization the concept of value in The relationship between man and the environment in Habitation open spaces In traditional Iranian architecture, (Fine Arts), 249(1), 101-114, [In Persian]
  23. Halbertsma, M. E., & Kuipers, M. C. (2014). Het erfgoeduniversum: Een inleiding in de theorie en praktijk van cultureel erfgoed. Coutinho.
  24. Hanachi, Pirouz & Fedainejad, Somia. (2012). Codification of the conceptual framework of protection and integrated regeneration in cultural-historical contexts, Architecture and Urbanism (Fine Arts), 3(46), 15-26, [In Persian]
  25. Hanachi, Pirouz & Poursarajian, Mahmoud. (2012). Revival of the historical context with a partnership approach, Tehran: University of Tehran, [In Persian]
  26. Hazen, H. (2009). Valuing Natural Heritage: Park Visitors' Values Related to World Heritage Sites in the USA. Current Issues in Tourism, 12(2), 165-181.
  27. Hindiani, Abdullah and Ghasemlou, Musa. (2017). The role of national values and norms and social In the prevention of soft threat With a law enforcement approach, Strategic Studies, 2(4), 35-66, [In Persian]
  28. Hojjat, Mahdi. (2001). Cultural heritage in Iran, Policies for an Islamic country, Tehran: Cultural Heritage Organization of the country, [In Persian]
  29. ICOMOS. (1993). Guidelines for education and training for the conservation of monuments, ensembles and sites.
  30. ICOMOS. (1994). The NARA Document on Authenticity. ICOMOS: Nara. Retrieved from www.icomos.org/docs/naradoc.html
  31. International Congress of Modern Architecture. (1931). The Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments. In 4th International Congresses of Modern Architecture s. Athens, Greece.
  32. International Council on Monuments and Sites. (1964). International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964). In 2nd International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments. Venice, Italy.
  33. Ismaili Sangri, Hossein. & Omrani, Behrouz. (2008). History and architecture of Tabriz bazaar, Tabriz,  Sotodeh publication, [In Persian]
  34. Jamieson, W. (1998). Cultural Heritage Tourism Planning and Development: Defining the Field and Its Challenges. APT Bulletin 29, No. ¾, 65.
  35. Jokilehto, J. (2006). Considerations on Authenticity and Integrity in World Heritage Context. City & Time, 1(2), 70-83.
  36. Lamprakos, M. (2014). Riegl’s modern cult of monuments and the problem of value. Change Over Time: An International Journal of Conservation and the Built Environment, 4(2), 418-435.
  37. Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324-327.
  38. Lipe, W. (1984). Value and Meaning in Cultural Resources. In H. Cleere (Ed.), Approaches to the Archaeological Heritage: A Comparative Study of World Cultural Resource Management Systems (pp. 1-11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Marquis, P., & Kyle. (1999-2002). The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS charter for places of cultural significance.
  40. Mashhadizadeh-Dahaghani, Nasser and Rostami, Faramarz. (2014). Organizing and empowering Disorganized areas With the approach of valueism, Urbanism and Architecture, 4(45), 52-71, [In Persian]
  41. Mason, R. (2002). Assessing Values in Conservation Planning: Methodological Issues and Choices. In Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage (Research Report). Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute (pp. 5-30).
  42. Mason, R. (2005). Assessing values in conservation planning: Methodological issues and choices. In M. De la Torre (Ed.), Heritage values in site management: Four case studies (pp. 5–30). Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
  43. Mason, R., & Avrami, E. (2000). Heritage values and challenges of conservation planning. Management Planning for Archaeological Sites, an International Workshop organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and the Loyola Marymount University, May 2000, Corinth, Greece, 13-26.
  44. Mason, R., David, M., Delatorre, M. (2003). Port Arthur historic site management Authority a case study, Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.
  45. Matero, F. (2000). Ethics and Policy in conservation Newsletter.
  46. Meier, H. R., Scheurmann, I., Sonne, W. (Eds.). (2013). Werte. Begründungen der Denkmalpfege in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Berlin: Jovis.
  47. ministry of Housing and Urbanization. (2009). An experience in documenting Iranian markets, Tehran, Academic Center for Education of University of Tehran Fine Arts Campus, [In Persian]
  48. Mirhosseini, Zeinab Al-Sadat & Jahanbakhsh, Haider. (2016). Investigating the impact of physical components of historical context on the environmental security of tourists (case study: Charkhab neighborhood, Ardakan city). Hoviat shahr, 10(28), 89-104, [In Persian]
  49. Mitchell, N. J. (2008). Considering the Authenticity of cultural landscape. APT Bulletin, 39(2/3).
  50. Nejadabrahimi, Ahad, Pourjafar, Mohammad Reza, Ansari, Mojtabi, Hanachi, Pirouz. (2013). Its value and relationship with the approach of intervention in historical-cultural works, conservation and architecture of Iran, 2(3), 79-89, [In Persian]
  51. Park, E., Choi, B. K., Lee, T. J. (2019). The role and dimensions of authenticity in heritage tourism. Tourism Management, Vol.74, No.1, 99-109.
  52. Pereira Roders, A. R. (2007). Re-architecture: Lifespan rehabilitation of built heritage capitellum. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
  53. Rezazadeh Ardebi, M., Rezazadeh Ardebili, R., Moradi, Mojgan. (2019). Recognizing the Values of the Kashan Historic Urban Context for Achieving Appropriate Regeneration (Case Study: Sarpelleh Passageway). Heritage, 2, 88.
  54. Riegle, A. (1902). The Modern Cult of Monuments: Its Character and Its Origin. (K. W. Forster & D. Ghirardo, Trans.).
  55. Riegle, A. (1982). The modern Cult of Monument: Its Charter and Its Origin. Oppositions: A Journal for Ideas and Criticism in Architecture, 25(2), 21-56.
  56. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Journal of Qualitative Studies, Research, 13(7), 905-923.
  57. Shahrokhi, Shima, Niknami, Kamaluddin, Izadi, Mohammad Saeed, (2021). The role of the two components of conservation and dynamics in Revival of architectural heritage Based on the continuity of place values (case study: the architectural heritage of the historical area of Choghazanbil), 32(3), 105-124, [In Persian]
  58. Shirvani, Maryam, Ahmadi, Hossein, Watan Doost, Rasul. (2016). Recognition of the value and influential factors in transformation of value views In the protection of cultural heritage in the present century, Architecture and Urbanism (Fine Arts), 21(4), 39-50, [In Persian]
  59. Silberberg, T. (1995). Cultural Tourism and Business Opportunities for Museums and Heritage Sites. Tourism Management. 16(5). 361-365.
  60. Sultanzadeh, Hossein. (1997). Tabriz, a stable adobe in Iranian architecture, Tehran, Cultural Research Office, [In Persian]
  61. Throsby, D. (2006). Economic and cultural value in the work of creative artists. In M. La Torre, et al. (Eds.), Values and Heritage Conservation (pp. 26-31). Los Angeles: Getty conservation institute.
  62. World Architecture Construction Federation. (1977). The Charter of Machu Picchu. Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal, Lima, Peru.

فایل‌های تکمیلی/اضافی

  • تاریخ دریافت 28 اردیبهشت 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 23 تیر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 01 مهر 1402