بررسی سیر تحولات کالبدی شارستان میبد از زمان شکل‌گیری تاکنون

نوع مقاله : برگرفته از پایان‌نامه کارشناسی‌ارشد

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد مرمت و احیای ابنیه و بافت‌های تاریخی، گروه مرمت و احیای بناها و بافت‌های تاریخی، دانشکده حفاظت و مرمت، دانشگاه هنر ایران، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه مرمت و احیای بناها و بافت‌های تاریخی، دانشکده حفاظت و مرمت، دانشگاه هنر ایران، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشیار، پژوهشگاه میراث فرهنگی و گردشگری، تهران،‌ ایران.

چکیده
برج و باروهای شهری به عنوان یکی از الزامات اساسی در دفاع از سکونت‌گاه‌ها در طول تاریخ در سرزمین‌های مختلف ایفای نقش کرده‌اند. نمونه‌های زیادی از برج و باروهای شهری در فلات ایران، به عنوان یکی از سرزمین‌های دارای سابقه‌ی طولانی زیست شهرنشینی، دیده می‌شود. این آثار به عنوان میراث شهرهای تاریخی واجد حفاظت هستند و جهت حفاظت از آن‌ها شناخت روند تحولات آن‌ها ضروری است. این پژوهش از طریق موردپژوهی انجام گرفته و برج و باروی میبد به عنوان یک اثر خاکی و بومی که دارای نقشی اساسی در تضمین حیات زیستگاه میبد در طول تاریخ بوده، مطالعه شده است. به منظور شناخت برج و باروی میبد و تحولات آن‌، این اثر از دو زاویه‌ی شناخت ویژگی‌های کالبدی و شناخت تغییرات و تحولات برج و بارو بررسی شد. در این پژوهش وضعیت اثر در ارتباط با جایگاه شارستان میبد در پنج دوره تاریخی مورد توجه قرار گرفت. نتایج این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که این اثر در دوره‌های تاریخی مختلف با توجه به جایگاه شهر هر دوره‌ی زمانی دستخوش تحولاتی شده تا به شاکله کنونی رسیده است. تحولات برج و بارو و شارستان را می‌توان بر اساس‌ شواهد میدانی و اسناد تاریخی در سه مرحله شکل‌گیری و رشد، تکامل و افول طبقه‌بندی کرد. هم‌چنین این پژوهش نشان داده که بیشترین میزان مداخلات مخرب با ورود خیابان‌سازی‌های مدرن و جریانات توسعه‌ی شهری روی داده است؛ این در حالی است که تغییرات تا پیش از این زمان در هماهنگی با نیروهای طبیعی در پاسخ به نیازهای انسان‌ها و با به کارگیری فناوری‌های بومی، به صورت حداقلی و بدون متحول کردن آنیِ شاکله‌ی کلی آن بوده است.

چکیده تصویری

بررسی سیر تحولات کالبدی شارستان میبد از زمان شکل‌گیری تاکنون

تازه های تحقیق

- وجود سه مرحله ساختمانی در برج و باروی میبد بر اساس مطالعات میدانی و اسناد: ۱) شکل‌گیری و رشد؛ ۲) تکامل؛ ۳) افول.
- برج و باروهای تاریخی تحت مفهوم زیرساخت در شهرهای تاریخی.
- عناصر بومی و سازگار در برج‌وباروی میبد و مداخلات صورت گرفته در آن شامل افزودن باغ خندق و دربندها.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

An approach to the evolution of Meybod Sharistan from its foundation to the present

نویسندگان English

Zahra Shafizadeh Esfandabadi 1
Ali Zamanifard 2
Zatollah Nikzad 3
1 M.A. in Conservation and Restoration of Historic Buildings and Urban Fabrics, Department of Conservation and Restoration Historic Architecture and Urban Fabrics, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Iran University of Art, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate professor, Department of Conservation and Restoration Historic Architecture and Urban Fabrics, Faculty of Conservation and Restoration, Iran University of Art, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate professor, Monuments of Conservation, Research Institute of Cultural Heritage and Tourism, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Fortifications such as city walls and citadels allowed people to settle in their land and protected their lives from natural and human threats. The history of sedentism in the central plateau of Iran dates back to 10,000 years ago. In addition to this historical context, there are still surviving vernacular urban and architectural spaces in Iran. Meybod is a desert city located in the central plateau of Iran, where human settlement might have begun during the Medain period. The city was fortified with a city wall and a citadel known as Narin Castle. The advent of modern streets and the loss of significant parts of the city walls in recent decades have endangered the integrity and values of these structures. Meybod city wall and Sharistan are also facing these challenges. To ensure effective conservation, a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of urban and architectural heritage is necessary, along with an explanation of the changes that have occurred over time. Therefore, the research focuses on the following problem: “How have the developments and transformations of Meybod Sharistan influenced the evolution and changes of Meybod city wall?” The following objectives are addressed:
• Understanding the transformations of Meybod city wall in interaction with the changes in Sharistan to form its current structure.
• Identifying the position of Meybod Sharistan and Meybod city wall in different historical periods.
Methods: This research employed a case study approach and a descriptive-analytical method. Bibliographic research was conducted by examining historical written sources, national and international documents and charters, as well as urban and regional development plans of Meybod. Other data sources, including aerial photographs, were also considered. The results of this research were presented through schematic illustrations and simulations of the current and initial conditions using 3D modeling software.
Findings: Meybod city wall is an integrated architectural complex within an enclosed environment. It is built from two main vernacular earthen materials: Khesht (adobe) and Chineh (mudbrick). Its form and layout follow the topography of the land, defining the boundaries of Sharistan between two elevated terraces to the south and north. 
Three of the four main gates, portions of the ditches, and 11 towers of the complex remain intact. In the south, the city wall merges with Narin Castle (the citadel) through a three-layered rampart. The city wall also features unique elements. One is Bagh Khandagh (ditch gardens), where the former ditches have been repurposed as gardens and farmland. Another distinctive feature is the Darbands, small gates that facilitate passage through the walls to the ditch gardens outside the city wall of Sharistan. The transformations of the city wall and Sharistan are categorized into distinct time periods. Based on the earliest reliable evidence of its foundation, the categorization begins with the Sassanian period:
1. Pre-Islamic Era to the 14th century (Sassanid Period): Sassanid cities were characterized by a citadel (Narin Castle) and city walls, which served as living areas for the ruler and high social classes, while lower classes lived outside the walls. The first foundation of the city wall was likely established during this period. The introduction of Islam to Iran led to the collapse of the Sassanid social hierarchy, and all social classes began living within the city walls of Sharistan, which included the citadel (Narin Castle), a Bazar (market), and the Jame Mosque. The city wall underwent significant restoration due to the Mongol invasion, and a northern gate was likely constructed during this time.
2. 14th century to the early 18th century (Muzaffarid Period to the Early Qajar Period): During the Muzaffarid period, the city’s importance increased due to its strategic location on the route from northern to southern Iran. As a result, it remained fortified, and the Kasnava gate was likely built. After the Muzaffarid period, the importance of the city wall gradually declined, although its conservation continued.
3. 18th century to 1925 (Qajar Period): During the Qajar period, modern concepts such as private property rights were introduced to Iran, which led to investment in real estate. Consequently, the city expanded northward, with ditch gardens and Darbands (small gates) created, along with the construction of private towers. The defensive role of the complex diminished, and the northern gate was replaced with a Sabat (an arched walkway or corridor).
4. 1925 to 1979 (Pahlavi Period): Urban planning concepts from the modern era were introduced to Iran. The first modern streets were built, disrupting the traditional urban fabric. City walls became obstacles to urban development, and the first street in Meybod was imposed, dividing the city into eastern and western sections.
5. Post-1979 (Islamic Republic of Iran): Modern construction and street development continued until the 1990s, during which the city walls were still regarded as an obstacle to development. The establishment of local NGOs, the inclusion of the historic city on heritage lists, and the development of urban plans that took heritage values into account led to restoration and conservation efforts. However, many of these activities were carried out with some errors.
Conclusion: The changes and transformations can be divided into three stages:
1. Formation and Expansion: This phase spans from the initial construction to the eve of the Qajar period, reflecting a close symbiosis between the city wall and the city itself. During this phase, the city wall served both as a protector and a boundary, while continuous expansion, repair, and construction took place.
2. Completion: The developments in this phase are attributed to the Qajar period, characterized by a situation in which the function of the complex was relatively preserved. As a result, the city wall continued to protect the city limits. Both the city and the city wall adapted to new needs and experienced internal growth.
3. Decline: This phase coincides with the arrival of modern urban development trends in the post-Qajar period. The original function of the city wall was lost, and it was no longer intertwined with the city. Consequently, it became an obstacle to urban growth. This paved the way for modern constructions and the demolition of parts of the city wall by the 1990s. Eventually, a shift in perspective occurred, and the city wall began to be recognized as a heritage site with historical and cultural significance.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

City Wall
Meybod Sharistan
City Fortification
Vernacular Architecture
Architectural Heritage
City Evolution

 این مقاله برگرفته از پایان‌نامه کارشناسی‌ارشد نویسنده نخست با عنوان «حفاظت جامع از میراث معماری استحکامات شهری؛ مطالعه موردی: فن‌شناسی و مرمت حصار تاریخی شهر میبد» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و مشاوره نویسنده سوم در دانشگاه هنر انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s master thesis entitled “Integrated Conservation of City Fortifications Architectural Heritage; Case Study: Technological Study and Restoration of Meybod Historical City Wall”, supervised by the second author and advised by the third, at Iran University of Art.

  1. Aghaeimehr, M., & Gharehbaglou, M. (2020). Identity-Based Contemporization; Case Study: Iran Contemporary Urban Districts in Pahlavi Era. Naqshejahan-Basic Studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning, 10(1), 11-18. [in Persian]
  2. Alehashemi, A., Mansouri, S.-A., & Barati, N. (2017). Urban infrastructures and the necessity of changing their definition and planning Landscape infrastructure; a new concept for urban infrastructures in 21st centur. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 13(43), 5-18. [in Persian]
  3. Amer, S. Belali-Oskouyee, A. (2020). Architectural structure of fortifications in Iranian settlements based on Mtaraghchi drawings. Athar, 41(3), 348-364. [in Persian]
  4. Architectural and urban planning consulting engineers of Arseh. 2007. Master plan of Meybod city. Ministry of houses & Urban Development, Housing and Urban Development Yazd. Yazd. [in Persian]
  5. Ashraf, A. (1974). Vizhegi-hay-e Tarikhi-e Shahrneshini Dar Iran: Dore-ye Eslami [Historical characteristics of urbanization in Iran: the Islamic period]. Journal of social sciences letter, 1(4). [in Persian]
  6. Asgharian Jeddi, A. (2005). Architectural Requirements for Sustainable Defense Shahid Beheshti University]. [in Persian]
  7. Bahra, B., & Naderi, N. (2020). The changes in physical structure of the historic city of Yazd from the beginning to the Timurid era. Athar, 41(3), 258-278. [in Persian]
  8. Consulting Engineers of Sharan. 2013. Detailed plan of the Meybod city. Municipality of Meybod. Meybod. [in Persian]
  9. Consulting Engineers of Tarh va Kavosh. 1998. Master plan of Meybod city. Ministry of houses & Urban Development, Housing and Urban Development Yazd. Yazd. [in Persian]
  10. Esfanjary, E. (2017). Persian historic urban landscapes: interpreting and managing Maibud over 6000 years. Edinburgh university press.
  11. Esfanjary-Kenari, E. (2006). Shaloode-ye Kohan-e Shahr-e Meinod. In E. N. Esfanjary Kenari, Zatollah & S. K. Janebollhi, Mohammad Hossein (Eds.), Meybod Shahri Ke Hast: Majmooe Pajoohesh hay e Tarikh e Memari va Shahrsazi [Maibud the city that exist: A collection of researches on the history of architecture and urban planning]. Center of cultural heritage and tourism of the historic city of Maibud. [in Persian]
  12. Esfanjary-Kenari, E., Zaker-Ameli, L., & Kazemi-Rahimabadi, T. (2001). The registration report of the historical city of Maibud (3490). H. a. T. Organization of Cultural Heritage. [in Persian]
  13. European Charter of the Architectural Heritage. (1975). Retrieved from: https://www.icomos.org/en/what-we-do/involvement-in-international-conventions/standards/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/170-european-charter-of-the-architectural-heritage at January 22, 2024; 3:56: 54 PM.
  14. Fallah, A. (2004). Barresi-ye Sakhtar-haye Tadafoee - Tarixi-e Meybod [Investigation of Meybod defensive-historical structures]. In. Maibud: Cultural Heritage Organization of the country (Islamic republic of Iran). [in Persian]
  15. Habibi, M. (2018). Az Shar ta Shahr (Tahlili tarikhi az mafhoom e shahr va simaye kalbadi e an, tafakkor va taa’ssor) [From Shar to city (a historical analysis of the concept of urban and physical landscape of it, thinking and impression)]. Tehran university publications. [in Persian]
  16. Helwing, B. (2012). The Iranian Plateau. A companion to the archaeology of the ancient Near East, 501-511.
  17. Heydariyehzadeh, M. (1979). Bolook-e Meybod [Meybod district]. Chekideh. [in Persian]
  18. INBR, 2012. Mabhas-e Bist o Yekom, Padafand-e Gheir-r Amel [The 21st topic: Passive Defense]. Tehran: Tosseh Iran. [in Persian]
  19. ICOMOS, C. (1999). Charter on the built vernacular heritage. In: ICOMOS Paris, France.
  20. Iranica, E. (2024). Encyclopedia iranica. In BĀRŪ. Retrieved from: https://iranicaonline.org/articles/baru-or-bara-fortress-in-general-defensive-wall-rampart at January 22, 2024; 11:56:46 AM.
  21. Katbi, M. (1985). Tarix-e Al-e Mozaffar [History of Al-e Mozaffar]. In A. H. Navayee (Ed.). Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishers. [in Persian]
  22. Kleiss, W., & Najd-Samiee, F. (1996). Memari-ye Orartoyee [Urartian Architecture]. Athar, 17 (26-27), 86-105. [in Persian]
  23. Longman Dictionary. (2024). In Infrastructure. Retrieved from: https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/infrastructure at January 22, 2024; 11:51:15 AM.
  24. Mahdavinejad, M., & Mansouri Majomerd, P. (2015). Modern Movement and Contemporary Architecture of Iran. Journal of Studies on Iranian-Islamic City, 6(21), 19-30. [in Persian]
  25. Malekzadeh Bayani, S. (1969). Padeshahi e Pourandokht Malake ye Sasani va Pajooheshi Darbare ye Sekke haye Zaman e Ou [The kingdom of Sasanian Queen Purandokht and a research on the coins of her time]. Historical reviews 1 (4). [in Persian]
  26. Mirjani-Arjanan, M., Rezaloo, R., Hajizadeh-Bastani, K., & Sardari-Zarchi, A. (2018). Barresi-e Moallefe haye Joghrafiayee va Mohit-e Zisti dar Sheklgiri-e Shahr-e Meybod az Pish az Tarikh ta Doran-e Eslami [Investigating the geographical and environmental components in the formation of the city of Meybod from prehistory to the Islamic era]. Quarterly of Iranian Islamic City Studies 9 (33). [in Persian]
  27. Moazen, S., & Sad Berenji, S. (2021). Physical Analysis and Cognition of Vernacular Architecture in Leives Village. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism (JIAU), 12(2), 153-169. [in Persian]
  28. Mollazadeh, K., & Mohammadi, M. (2006). Qela'' va Estehkamat-e Nezami (Dayerat-o-lmaa''ref-e Banaha-ye Tarixi-ye Iran dar Dore-ye Eslami). [in Persian]
  29. Mostofi Bafghi, M. (2006). Jameʿ-e Mofidi [Mofidi’s Comprehensive book]. In Afshar, I. (Ed.). Tehran: Asatir [in Persian]
  30. Mustaufi, H. (1983). Nuzhat al-qulub. In Strange, G. L. (Ed.). Tehran: Donya-ye Ketab. [in Persian]
  31. Moallem Yazdi, M. (1947). Mavaahe-e Elahi Dar Tarikh-e Al-e Muzaffar [Divine gifts in the history of Al e Muzaffar]. In Nafisi, S. (Ed.) Tehran: Eqbal Library and Printing House. [in Persian]
  32. Nikzad, Z. (2020). Re-reading of Haji Rajabali''s Deed of Endowment about Masjid-i Jami of Meybod, in point of view of architectural history. Journal of Architecture in Hot and Dry Climate, 8(11), 1-25. [in Persian]
  33. Nikzad, Z., & Ghafouri, N. (2015). Bookani Architecture in Narin Castle (Meybod). Athar, 70, 109-126. [in Persian]
  34. Oxford Learners’ Dictionary. (2024). In Infrastructure. Retrieved from: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/infrastructure at January 22, 2024; 11:52:00 AM.
  35. Pooya, A. (2016). Sima-ye Bastani-ye Shahr-e Maibud; Barresi Sazvareh va Sakht-e Yek Shahr-e Kaviri [The Archaic image of Maibud: A historical survey of the organism and structure]. Yazd Publishing House. [in Persian]
  36. Qanoon-e Tashkil-e Eyalat va Velayat va Dastour Olamal-e Hokkam [The Law on the Formation of States and Provinces and Governors'' Instructions], (1907). [in Persian]
  37. Recognition, documentation, conservation and organizing plan of architectural remains and traces of the eastern rampart of the Meybod historic city wall. 2018. Meybod: Historic City Research Center, Meybod. [in Persian]
  38. Report of the protection and restoration workshop of the Meybod Sharestan city wall. 2010. Meybod: Historic City Research Center, Meybod, Organization of Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism. [in Persian]
  39. Shafizadeh Esfandabadi, Z. (2021). Integrated Conservation of City Fortifications Architectural Heritage; Case Study: Technological Study and Restoration of Meybod Historical City Wall University of Art].
  40. The BAM Declaration and Recommendations. (2004). International Workshop on the Recovery of Bam’s Cultural Heritage.  Iranian Cultural Heritage Organization, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), UNESCO Tehran Cluster Office.
  41. The Historical City of Maybod, UNESCO World Heritage Convention (2007). Retrived from: https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5193/ at January 22, 2024; 11:49:16 AM.
  42. Tracy, J. D. (2000). City walls: the urban enceinte in global perspective (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
  43. Yazdī, M. (1947). Mavaahe e Elahi Dar Tarikh e Al e Muzaffar [Divine gifts in the history of Al e Muzaffar]. In S. Nafisi (Ed.). Tehran: Eqbal Library and Printing House. [in Persian]

  • تاریخ دریافت 23 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 05 بهمن 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 27 فروردین 1403