رهیافت‌های توسعه گردشگری در شهرهای کوچک برمبنای تحلیل عوامل و مسائل بازدارنده آن؛ مطالعه موردی: شهر دلبران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد طراحی صنعتی (مربی مدعو)، گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

2 استاد، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.

چکیده
جریان فعالیت گردشگری اثرات زیادی را در زمینه‌های مختلف به دنبال دارد و رونق و توسعه آن نیز وابسته به عوامل متنوعی است. ضعف امکانات شهری و خدمات زیرساختی، در شهرهای کوچک مناطق محروم، عاملی است که فاصله جریان فعالیت گردشگری را نسبت به حد ایده‌آل بیشتر می‌کند و محدودیت‌ها و مسائلی را در مسیر توسعه آن به وجود می‌آورد. این پژوهش که از نوع کاربردی و رویکرد روش‌شناسی آن آمیخته است، با هدف ارائه رهیافت‌های توسعه گردشگری در شهرهای کوچک، در پی تبیین و تحلیل زمینه‌های بازدارنده توسعه گردشگری در شهر دلبران می‌باشد. مسائل مترتب بر گردشگری شهر دلبران و حوزه تحت نفوذ آن احصاء و جمع‌آوری شده و بر اساس بار محتوایی آنها در سه بُعد ناکارآمدی نظام اقتصادی، ضعف زیرساخت‌های ارتباطی و خدماتی و ناتوانی و سستی ساختارهای اجتماعی-فرهنگی نام‌گذاری و دسته‌بندی شدند. ابعاد مذکور در ارتباط با ایستایی فعالیت گردشگری از طریق 23 شاخص مشاهده‌پذیر و در چارچوب مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری (SEM) سنجش و بررسی شد. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهند که رابطه عامل‌های ضعف زیرساخت‌ها و ناکارآمدی نظام اقتصادی با ایستایی فعالیت گردشگری معنی‌دار می‌باشد و 94 درصد از تغییرات کسادی و بی رونقی فعالیت گردشگری در مدل ساختاری پژوهش قابل تبیین و برآورد است. ناکارآمدی نظام اقتصادی و ضعف زیرساخت‌ها به ترتیب با ضریب اثر 0.401 و 0.394 بر ایستایی فعالیت گردشگری اثرگذار هستند. ضعف زیرساخت‌ها هرچند در رتبه دوم اثرگذاری قرار دارد ولی به دلیل اینکه اثر غیرمستقیم (0.311) هم دارد مهم‌ترین و اثرگذارترین متغیر موثر بر جریان فعالیت گردشگری است. درنهایت متناسب با نقشه روابط میان عوامل و مسائل بازدارنده فعالیت گردشگری، رهیافت‌های ارتقاء و توسعه زیرساخت‌های ارتباطی و خدماتی، بهبود زمینه‌های اقتصادی و توانمندسازی ساختارهای اجتماعی- فرهنگی ارائه شده است.

چکیده تصویری

رهیافت‌های توسعه گردشگری در شهرهای کوچک برمبنای تحلیل عوامل و مسائل بازدارنده آن؛ مطالعه موردی: شهر دلبران

تازه های تحقیق

- مدلسازی عوامل بازدارنده توسعه گردشگری در شهرهای کوچک.
- رهیافت‌های توسعه زیرساخت‌های ارتباطی و خدماتی.
- توانمندسازی ساختارهای اجتماعی- فرهنگی و بهبود زمینه‌های اقتصادی. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Tourism development approaches in small cities based on the analysis of relevant factors and obstacles; Case study: Delbaran city

نویسندگان English

Mehdi Abdolmaleki 1
Kyoumars Habibi 2
Mehdi Saidi 3
1 M.A. in Industrial Design (Visiting Instructor), Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art & Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Tourism activities have wide-ranging effects in various fields, and their development relies on various factors. In small cities within deprived areas, inadequate urban facilities and infrastructure are significant barriers to reaching optimal tourism levels, leading to limitations and problems. The success of tourism development programs and the achievement of their goals depends on the presence of favorable economic, social, infrastructural, and environmental conditions. In cities lacking these favorable conditions, tourism does not flourish. Small cities, in particular, experience reduced tourism dynamics due to fewer and more limited infrastructure services compared to larger cities. Delbaran, is a small city in Qorveh County, Kurdistan Province, Iran. This city is an example of not having a dynamic tourism sector despite attractions like the nearby Babagargar Spring, vineyards, religious events such as Haleem cooking, and access to Ali-Sadr Cave. Accordingly, this study aims to analyze the obstacles to tourism development in Delbaran city and its surrounding areas and present sustainable approaches for tourism development in small cities.
Methods: The study is applied research focused on identifying the obstacles to tourism development in Delbaran City and proposing strategic solutions. A mixed-method approach (quantitative and qualitative) was employed to collect, process, and analyze data. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to analyze relationships between research variables via Smart PLS software. Initially, a field survey was conducted by the jihadi problem-solving group of Iran’s National Elites Foundation (INEF) of Kurdistan Province to gather data on problems and limitations related to the tourism industry in Delbaran and its sphere of influence. Then, the problems and limitations were categorized into three categories: inefficiency of the economic system, weakness of infrastructures (communication and services), and weakness of socio-cultural structures. In the second step, the relationships between the problems and obstacles to tourism development were determined based on the theoretical knowledge of tourism to form the conceptual and structural model. In the third step, a Likert scale questionnaire was used to score and examine the status of the issues related to the stagnation of tourism in Delbaran City and its sphere of influence. Local elites aware of the issues in the studied city and region participated in the survey.
Findings: The results reveal a significant relationship between the “weakness of infrastructures” and “inefficiency of the economic system” factors, accounting for 94% of the stagnation in tourism activities. The inefficiency of the economic system and weak infrastructures had effect sizes of 0.401 and 0.394, respectively. While infrastructure weaknesses had a slightly smaller direct effect on tourism stagnation than economic inefficiency, its indirect effect (0.311) made it the most critical variable influencing tourism dynamics. Based on the relationships between the problems and obstacles to tourism development, three priority approaches were recommended: 1. Improvement and development of communication and service infrastructures; 2. Enhancement of the economic system; and 3. Empowerment of socio-cultural structures. Executive policies for each strategy were also proposed to achieve sustainable tourism development.
Conclusion: Many studies have mentioned tourism as an important factor influencing the economic situation in countries, but to harness its full potential, a detailed and fundamental approach is necessary to identify and address all relevant aspects. In this context, while tourism has various positive impacts across different sectors, it is also affected by economic, social, political, and other conditions. If environmental, economic, social, political, and infrastructural conditions are lacking, tourism activities will not achieve the intended positive outcomes. In small cities within deprived areas, inadequate service infrastructures and facilities hinder dynamic and prosperous tourism. The research findings highlight two key issues: 1. In deprived areas, many small cities with valuable attractions struggle to utilize their existing potential due to factors that obstruct tourism development; and 2. The second issue stresses the influence of these factors, indicating that challenges related to communication and service infrastructures not only have direct effects on tourism activities but also indirectly weaken them.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Tourism Development
Small Cities
Factors and Obstacles
Structural Model
  1. Akbarian ronizi, S., & Rastegar, E. (2019). The Analysis and prioritization of marketing mix components in the tourism development (Case study: Shiraz metropolis). Journal of Research and Urban Planning, 10(38), 25–38. [In Persian]
  2. Angelevska-Najdeska, K., & Rakicevik, G. (2012). Planning of Sustainable Tourism Development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 44, 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.022
  3. Behboudi, O., Rojui, M., Zarei, A., & Shojaee, G. (2019). Designing the Model of Evaluation of Marketing Performance in the Tourism Industry of Iran. Journal of Tourism and Development, 7(4), 61–82. [In Persian]
  4. Boivina, M., Tanguay, G.A. (2019). Analysis of the determinants of urban tourism attractiveness: The case of Québec City and Bordeaux. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 11, 67-79.
  5. Carlisle, S., Johansen, A., & Kunc, M. (2016). Strategic foresight for (coastal) urban tourism market complexity: The case of Bournemouth. Tourism management, 54, 81-95.
  6. Chica, M., Hernández, J. M., & Perc, M. (2022). Sustainability in tourism determined by an asymmetric game with mobility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 355, 131662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131662
  7. Cooper, C., Fletcher, J., Fyall, A., Gilbert, D., & Wanhill, S. (2018) Tourism: Principles and Practice, 6nd Ed. United Kingdom: Pearson.
  8. Cracolici, M. F., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). The attractiveness and competitiveness of tourist destinations: A study of Southern Italian regions. Tourism Management, 30(3), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.07.006
  9. De Siano, R., & Canale, R. R. (2022). Controversial effects of tourism on economic growth: A spatial analysis on Italian provincial data. Land Use Policy, 117, 106081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106081
  10. Dinari, A. (2005). Urban tourism in Iran and the world. Mashhad: Vajgan Khord Publications. [In Persian]
  11. Ebrahimzadeh, I., Kazemizad, S., & Eskandari Sani, M. (2011). Strategic Planning for Tourism Development, Emphasizing on Religious Tourism (Case Study: Qom City). Human Geography Research, 43(2), 115–141. [In Persian]
  12. Eckert, C., & Pechlaner, H. (2019). Alternative Product Development as Strategy Towards Sustainability in Tourism: The Case of Lanzarote. Sustainablity. 11(13), 2-18.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133588
  13. Ekeocha, D. O., Ogbuabor, J. E., Orji, A., & Kalu, U. I. (2021). International tourism and economic growth in Africa: A post-global financial crisis analysis. Tourism Management Perspectives, 40, 100896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100896
  14. Gholami, Y., & Khalji, N. (2017). Developed and prioritize strategies for tourism development with a sustainable approachh (Case study: Kashan). Urban Tourism, 4(2), 17–30. [In Persian]
  15. Gugushvili, T., Salukvadze. G., Salukvadze, J. (2017). Fragmented development: Tourism-driven economic changes in Kazbegi, Georgia, Annals of Agrarian Science, 15(1), 49-54.
  16. Habibpour Getabi, K., & Safari Shali, R. (2008). A comprehensive guide to using SPSS in survey research. Tehran: Motafkaran Publications. [In Persian]
  17. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer.
  18. Heydari, R., Talebpour, M., Nazari torshizi, A., Shajie, K., & Jaberi, S. (2020). Codification of Strategies for Competitiveness and Sports Tourism Development in Cities by using of Meta SWOT Technique (Case Study: Mashhad Metropolis). Urban Tourism, 7(1), 143–159. [In Persian]
  19. Hieu, V. M., & Nwachukwu, C. (2019). Perception of Sustainable Tourism Development: Insights from Stakeholders in PHU QUOC Island, Vietnam. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), 10(02), 1776-1788.
  20. Khataei, M., Farzin, M. R., Mousavei A. (2008). Measuring the Efficiency of Selected Hotels in Tehran: A DEA Approach. The Economic Research, 8(2), 1-24. [In Persian]
  21. Kyara, V. C., Rahman, M. M., & Khanam, R. (2021). Tourism expansion and economic growth in Tanzania: A causality analysis. Heliyon, 7(5), e06966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06966
  22. Liu, S. T. (2020). Comparing the perspectives of municipal tourism departments and cultural departments on urban cultural-tourism development. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management16, 100432.
  23. Liu, Z., Wang, A., Weber, K., Chan, E. H. W., & Shi, W. (2022). Categorisation of cultural tourism attractions by tourist preference using location-based social network data: The case of Central, Hong Kong. Tourism Management, 90, 104488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104488
  24. Marinos, T., Belegri-Roboli, A., Michaelides, P. G., & Konstantakis, K. Ν. (2022). The spatial spillover effect of transport infrastructures in the Greek economy (2000–2013): A panel data analysis. Research in Transportation Economics, 101179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2022.101179
  25. Mies, A., & Gold, S. (2021). Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128960
  26. Movahed, A. (2016). Urban tourism. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University Publications. [In Persian]
  27. Reitsamer, B. F., Brunner-Sperdin, A., & Stokburger-Sauer, N. E. (2016). Destination attractiveness and destination attachment: The mediating role of tourists’ attitude. Tourism Management Perspectives, 19, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.05.003
  28. Salehi, S., & Pazoukinejad, Z. (2014). A Sociological Analysis of Sustainable Mobility in Tourism Industry. Journal of Tourism Planning and Development, 3(10), 162–181. [In Persian]
  29. Salinas Fernández, J. A., Guaita Martínez, J. M., & Martín Martín, J. M. (2022). An analysis of the competitiveness of the tourism industry in a context of economic recovery following the COVID19 pandemic. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121301
  30. Saluja, V., Anand, S., Kumar, H., & Peng, J. (2022). The perceived impact of tourism development and sustainable strategies for residents of Varkala, South India. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10(2), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.03.003
  31. Shatrian, M., Gholami, Y., & Mirmohammadi, M. (2017). Evaluation Indicators of Tourism Development in the City of Kashan. The Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 17(46), 195-214. [In Persian]
  32. Stokowski, P. A., Kuentzel, W. F., Derrien, M. M., & Jakobcic, Y. L. (2021). Social, cultural and spatial imaginaries in rural tourism transitions. Journal of Rural Studies, 87, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.011
  33. Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S. and Vinzi, V.E. (2004) A Global Goodness-of-Fit Index for PLS Structural Equation Modelling. Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, 1, 739-742.
  34. Thabet, A. (2007). An approach to a strategy for improving Libya’s tourism industry. International Biennia Tourism, 26(1), 22-34.
  35. Wang, D., Niu, Y., & Qian, J. (2018). Evolution and optimization of China’s urban tourism spatial structure: A high speed rail perspective. Tourism Management, 64, 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.08.010
  36. Wang, J., Huang, X., Gong, Z., & Cao, K. (2020). Dynamic assessment of tourism carrying capacity and its impacts on tourism economic growth in urban tourism destinations in China. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management15, 100383.
  37. Wetzels, R., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Jakab, E., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2009). How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: A flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t–test, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 752-760.
  38. Yoopetch, C., & Nimsai, S. (2019). Science Mapping the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Tourism Development, 1990–2018. Sustainability, 11(13), 1-17.
  39. Yuxi, Z., Linsheng, Z., Ling-en, W., & Hu, Y. (2022). Measuring the conflict tendency between tourism development and ecological protection in protected areas: A study on National Nature Reserves in China. Applied Geography, 142, 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102690
  40. Zarabadi, Z., & Abdullah, B. (2012). Evaluation of effective factors in the development of tourism industry in Chabahar Azad region using the method of analytic network process (ANP). Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism, 4(6), 37-48. [In Persian]
  41. Zhang, X., Zhong, L., & Yu, H. (2022). Sustainability assessment of tourism in protected areas: A relational perspective. Global Ecology and Conservation, 35, e02074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02074

فایل‌های تکمیلی/اضافی

  • تاریخ دریافت 07 اسفند 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 20 اردیبهشت 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 27 تیر 1402