عاملیت دستگاه تلویزیون در تغییرات خانه‏‌های طبقه‌‏ی متوسط شهر تهران (1337-1357)

نوع مقاله : برگرفته از رساله دکتری

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای معماری، گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران.

4 دانشیار، گروه مطالعات فرهنگی، پژوهشگاه مطالعات فرهنگی، اجتماعی و تمدنی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
خانه، به مثابه‌ی شبکه‌ای پیچیده از سازه‌های معماری، اشیاء، مفاهیم، انسان‏‌ها و ... همواره در معرض تغییر بوده و هست. هر یک از این عناصر به‏‌عنوان کنشگری فعال، نقشی را در تغییر خانه و فضاهای خانگی بازی می‌کنند. بازشناسی میزان عاملیت و نقش هر یک از این بازیگران در شبکه‌ی خانه و تغییرات آن، می‌تواند به فهم بیشتر و بهتر خانه به‌‏عنوان نهادی پویا و چند بعدی کمک کند. تلویزیون از جمله بازیگران مهم فضای خانگی است که تغییرات مهمی را در فرم، عملکرد و معنای خانه بوجود آورده است. با وجود اهمیت بسیار محتوای تلویزیون، این پژوهش بر روی نقش فرهنگ مادی تلویزیون و میزان عاملیت آن در تغییرات خانه تمرکز نموده است. برای دستیابی به این منظور، این پژوهش از روش مردم‌‏نگاری بهره برده است. داده‌‏های مورد نیاز از سه منبع مصاحبه‏‌های عمیق نیمه‌ساختاریافته با ساکنین خانه‏‌های طبقه متوسط شهر تهران در بازه زمانی مورد نظر، آلبوم‌های عکس‌‏های خانوادگی و مطالب و تصاویر مجلات عامه‏‌پسند، تامین شده و در نهایت با کمک نرم‌افزار اطلس.تی مورد تحلیل موضوعی قرار گرفته‌‏اند. یافته‏‌ها نشان می‌دهند که با وجود مقاومت‌های شدید ایدئولوژیک و اقتصادی، تلویزیون توانست به سرعت فرآیند خانگی شدن را طی کند. فرآیندی که در آن می‌بایست چهار دسته ملاحظات فضایی، عملکردی، زیبایی‌‏شناختی و فرهنگی- اجتماعی درنظر گرفته می‌‏شدند. دستگاه تلویزیون پس از خانگی شدن، علاوه بر تغییر عملکردها و مفاهیم مرتبط با خانه و زندگی خانگی، مثل درون/ بیرون، عمومی/ خصوصی و ... در تغییرات کالبدی فضاهای خانگی، بخصوص در تغییر سازماندهی فضایی، تغییر کانون فضایی و حرکت به سمت پلان باز، دارای عاملیت بوده است.

چکیده تصویری

عاملیت دستگاه تلویزیون در تغییرات خانه‏‌های طبقه‌‏ی متوسط شهر تهران (1337-1357)

تازه های تحقیق

- نگاه به خانه به عنوان شبکه‌‏ای پیچیده از کنشگران انسانی/غیرانسانی، مادی/غیرمادی وتوزیع متقارن عاملیت در میان تمام این کنشگران. 
- پیوند مطالعات فرهنگ مادی با مطالعات معماری، با بررسی تاثیر حضور فیزیکی تلویزیون بر تغییرات خانه در دو دهه‌‏ی آغازین ورود تلویزیون.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

The agency of TV set in the changes of middle-class homes in Tehran (1958-1978)

نویسندگان English

Abbas Habibi 1
Seyed Abbas Agha Yazdanfar 2
Mahdi Hamzenejad 3
Abbas Varij Kazemi 4
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture and environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
4 Associate Professor, Department of Cultural Studies, Institute of Cultural and Social Studies, Ministry of Science, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: The household, as a complex network of architectural structures, objects, technologies, energy flows, concepts, and humans, has always been subject to change. Each of these agents, as active actors, have always played a role in changing the home and domestic spaces. Recognizing the agency and role of each of these actors in the home network and its changes can help to better understand the household as a dynamic and multidimensional institution. While some of these actors are very simple and have lesser roles and effects in the home network, others are very complex. These complex actors can cause changes in the material and non-material environment around them from various aspects Television is one of the most complex actors in the household network, having introduced significant changes to the form, function, and meaning of the home since its advent. A key reason for its importance lies in the fact that, unlike most other domestic elements, television encompasses both a material and a content-based dimension and the content-based aspect is even more important than its material aspect. Despite the crucial significance of this content dimension, this study focuses on the material aspect of television, aiming to explore the role of television’s material culture and the extent of its agency in domestic transformations.
While this subject can be explored across different cultural contexts and temporal-spatial frameworks, this research specifically investigates the role of television in shaping the houses of Tehran’s middle-class during the first two decades following its introduction in Iran, that is, from the establishment of the first television network in Tehran in 1958 until the Iranian Revolution in 1978.
Methods: This research employs ethnographic methods and thematic analysis. Three primary sources of data were utilized: interviews with residents of Tehran during the specified period, photographs from family photo albums, and textual and visual content from lifestyle magazines of that era.
First, using a purposive and criterion-based sampling method, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with twenty individuals who lived in Tehran during the specified time period and owned a television set at the time. Family photographs were collected from three sources: participants’ personal photo albums, the researchers’ open search through various individuals’ family albums, and publicly available photos found on the internet and virtual social networks.
Regarding lifestyle magazines, data were gathered from four publications: Ettelā’āt-e Bānuvān, Ettelā’āt-e Māhāne, Ettelā’āt-e Haftegi, and Zan-e Rooz, all from the relevant time frame. Finally, all collected data were thematically analyzed using Atlas.ti software.
Findings: The findings indicate that in the early years, television faced various internal and external forms of resistance, most notably ideological and economic, when it was introduced to the middle-class homes in Tehran. Despite these challenges, television quickly found its way into homes, thanks to several key factors that helped make it a normal part of everyday domestic life. Among the most significant of these drivers were the connection it created between the outside world and the household, the domestication of leisure and entertainment, and the availability of television sets through installment payment plans. However, once inside the household, television encountered difficulties in finding a suitable and ideal placement due to the spatial organization of traditional Iranian houses. These houses were often characterized by closed floor plans and small, numerous, nested spaces. The absence of a large, central living area further exacerbated the challenge of integrating television into the domestic environment.
In the early years of television’s introduction, residents determined the placement of the television set through a process of trial and error, often guided by advice from popular magazines. In doing so, they took into account four main categories of considerations: functional, aesthetic, socio-cultural, and spatial. Thus, during this early period, the presence of the television set brought about numerous spatial, functional, and behavioral challenges, all of which required significant adjustments. The findings suggest that the material presence of television played an active role in driving these various spatial and structural changes within houses of the middle-class in Tehran.
Conclusion: In the first two decades following the introduction of television into the homes of Tehran’s middle-class, the presence of the television set played an active role in the occurrence of both material and immaterial changes within the spaces of these homes. Among these changes, one can note the transformation of certain concepts, such as inside-outside and public-private. These were concepts that had once been distinctly separated in domestic life and, consequently, in the architecture of Iranian homes, with clear and firm boundaries. However, with the advent of electronic media, particularly television, along with other agens not discussed here, these boundaries gradually became increasingly blurred.
The presence of television sets, along with the emergence of collective viewing behaviors and “television parties,” created a need for larger spaces that could serve as the main gathering area for the family while also accommodating guests who came to watch television. This need gradually led to a shift from closed floor plans to open ones, resulting in the integration of public spaces in new homes. The formation of a central hall, which eventually took on the role of the main living room, followed by the merging of the hall and guestroom to create the living/reception room, was a direct outcome of this shift.
As television became the central focus of home spaces, the empty area in front of the TV in typically unfurnished middle-class Iranian homes became the most important space for domestic activities. This transformation made television the key agent in organizing the public zone of homes.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Television
Material Culture
Home
Agency of Objects

این مقاله برگرفته از رساله دکتری نویسنده نخست با عنوان «رسانه‌‏ای شدن خانه‏‌ی ایرانی: فرهنگ مادی تلویزیون و تغییرات خانه در سده‌ی 1300 شمسی» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و سوم و مشاوره نویسنده چهارم در دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s doctoral thesis entitled “The mediatization of the Iranian home: the material culture of television and changes in the home in the 1300s SH.”, supervised by the second and third authors and advised by the fourth, at Iran University of Science and Technology.

  1. Abrahamian, Ervand. (2017). Iran between two revolutions, translated by Ahmad Golahmadi  and Mohamad ebrahim Fattahi, Tehran: Ney Publishing. [in Persian].
  2. Adib, M. (1965). Tehran electricity, Negin Weekly, 1(1), 35-38. [in Persian].
  3. Akrich, M. (1992). The De-scription of Technical Objects. in Bijker, W. & Law, J. (Eds). Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change  (pp. 205-224). MIT Press.
  4. Alexander, J. C. (2004). Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. Sociological theory, 22(4), 527-573.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2751.2004.00233.x
  5. Ardalan, F. & et. al. (1964). Iranshahr: Publication No. 22 of the UNESCO National Commission in Iran, Tehran: Tehran University Publications. [in Persian].
  6. Baudrillard, J. (2001). Jean Baudrillard: selected writings. Stanford University Press.
  7. Berwanger, B. (2017). Television in the third world. In A. Smith and R. Paterson (Eds.), Television: An international history (pp. 123-157), Translated by Vahedi, M. Tehran: Soroush Publishing. [in Persian].‏
  8. Chambers, D. (2020). Cultural Ideals of Home: The Social Dynamics of Domestic Space. Londen: Routledge.‏
  9. Chambers, D. (2019). Designing early television for the ideal home: The roles of industrial designers and exhibitions, 1930s–50s. Journal of Popular Television, 7(2), 145–59. https://doi.org/10.1386/jptv.7.2.145_1
  10. Chambers, D. (2016). Changing media, homes and households: Cultures, technologies and meanings. Londen: Routledge.‏
  11. Chambers, D. (2011). The Material Form of the Television Set: A Cultural History. Media History 17(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2011.603194
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge university press.‏
  13. De Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life (S. Rendall, Trans.). University of California Press.
  14. Habibi, A., Yazdanfar, S.A.,  Hamzenejad, M. & Kazemi, A. (2023). The domestication of media, the mediatization of homes; Material culture of media technologies and changes of home and domestic spaces in Iran, Journal of Iranian Cultural Research, 16(1), 5-47. [in Persian]. doi: 10.22035/jicr.2023.3013.3352
  15. Hollows, J. (2008) Domestic Cultures, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  16. Hurdley, R. (2006). Dismantling mantelpieces: Narrating identities and materializing culture in the home. Sociology, 40(4), 717-733.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506065157
  17. Karimi, P. (2021). Domesticity and Consumer Culture in Iran: interior Revolutions in the Modern Era, Translated by Taheri, Z. Tehran: Shirazeh Ketab Ma. [in Persian].
  18. Khatib-Chahidi, J. (1981).  Sexual Prohibitions, Shared Space and ‘Fictive’Marriages in Shi’ite Iran. in S. Ardener, (Ed.), Women and Space: Ground Rules and Social Maps (pp. 112-134). St. Martin’s press.
  19. Latour, B. (1994). Pragmatogonies: A mythical account of how humans and nonhumans swap properties. American behavioral scientist, 37(6), 791-808.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764294037006006
  20. Leal, O. F. (1990). Popular taste and erudite repertoire: The place and space of television in Brazil. Cultural studies, 4(1), 19-29.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389000490021
  21. Lull, J. (1990). Inside family viewing. Ethnographic research on television’s audiences. Londen: Routledge.‏
  22. Mahboubi Ardakani, H. (1991). History of new civilization institutions in Iran, Tehran: Tehran University Publications. [in Persian].
  23. Mäkikalli, M. (2019). Television in hiding: Early television sets in Finland. The Journal of Popular Television, 7(2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1386/jptv.7.2.161_1
  24. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about electric communication in the late nineteenth century. Oxford University Press, USA.
  25. Mccarthy, A. (2000). The misuse value of the TV set: Reading media objects in transnational urban spaces. International Journal of cultural studies, 3(3), 307-330.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/136787790000300301
  26. McCarthy, A. (2001a). From screen to site: Television's material culture, and its place. October, 98, 93-111.‏ https://doi.org/10.2307/779064
  27. McCarthy, A. (2001b). Ambient television: Visual culture and public space. Durham: Duke University Press.‏
  28. Mohsenian Rad, M. (2006). Iran in four communication galaxies: The evolution of the history of communication in Iran, from the beginning to today, Tehran: Soroush Publishing. [in Persian].
  29. Morley, D. (2007) ‘Media, Modernity and Technology: The Geography of the New’, London: Routledge.
  30. Morley, D. (1986) Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure, London: Comedia.
  31. Morley, D. (2017). Television, Audiencees, and cultural Studies, Translated by Abdi, S., Ghom: Logos Publications. [in Persian].
  32. O’sullivan, T. (2005). From television lifestyle to lifestyle television. In Bell, D. & Hollows, J. (Eds.) Ordinary lifestyles: popular media, consumption and taste (pp. 21-34). Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill International.‏
  33. Pardun, C. J., & Krugman, D. M. (1994). How the architectural style of the home relates to family television viewing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38(2), 145-162.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159409364253
  34. Rees, E. (2019). Television, gas and electricity. Consuming comfort and leisure in the British home 1946–65, The Journal of Popular Television, 7)2(, 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1386/jptv.7.2.127_1
  35. Sandbye, M. (2014). Looking at the family photo album: a resumed theoretical discussion of why and how. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 6(1), 25419.‏ https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v6.25419
  36. Sharifi Saei, M.H. (2022). History of women's awakening; Representation of Women and Family Issues in the Journalism of the Constitutional Era in Iran, Journal of Culture-Communication Studies, 23(60), 63-99. [in Persian]. doi.org/10.22083/jccs.2021.310610.3459
  37. Sharifzade, R. (2018). Negotiate with objects: Bruno Latour and Actor-Network Theory, Tehran: Ney Publishing. [in Persian].
  38. Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
  39. Silverstone, R. and Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical Change and Everyday Life, in Roger Silverstone and Robin Mansell (Eds), Communication by Design: The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 44-74.
  40. Spain, D. (1992). Gendered spaces. University of North Carolina Press.‏
  41. Spigel, L. (2022). TV Snapshots: An Archive of Everyday Life. Durham: Duke University Press.‏
  42. Spigel, L. (2020). TV Homes: Scenes from the Family Photo Album. Materia Arquitectura, (20), 136-141.‏ https://doi.org/10.56255/ma.v0i20.492
  43. Spigel, L. (2012). Object lessons for the media home: From storagewall to invisible design. Public Culture, 24)3(, 535–576.  https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-1630681
  44. Spigel, L. (1992). Make Room for TV: Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  45. Tichi, C. (1991). Electronic Hearth: Creating an American Television Culture, New York: Oxford University Press.
  46. Tilley, C. & et. al. (2021). Handbook of Material Culture, Translated by zokaei, M.S. & et. al., Tehran: Research center for culture, art and communication. [in Persian].
  47. Weekly information magazine, (1959). No. 917. [in Persian].
  48. Wentling, J. W. (1990). Housing by lifestyle: The component method of residential design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  49. Wheatley, H. (2017). Television in the ideal home. in R. Moseley, H. Wheatley and H. Wood (Eds). Television for Women (pp. 205-222). London: Routledge.
  50. Women's information magazine, (1961). No. 208. [in Persian].
  51. Women's information magazine, (1963). No. 329 & 346. [in Persian].
  52. Woodward, I. (2019). Understanding material culture, Translated by Madani Lavasani, Sh. Ghom: Logos Publications. [in Persian].
  53. Zahrani, D., Khorasgani, A., Sharifzadeh, A. & Ghanbari Barzian, A. (2021). Heterogeneous Agencies in More-Than-Human Sociology; Analysis the Place of Agency in Approaches of More-Than-Human Sociology by Focusing on Actor-Network Theory, Sociological Cultural Studies, 12(2), 81-110. [in Persian]. Doi: 10.30465/scs.2021.35214.2372

فایل‌های تکمیلی/اضافی

  • تاریخ دریافت 06 شهریور 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 آبان 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 28 آذر 1402