مدل‌یابی برهم کنش عناصر منظرین پیاده‌راه و سلامت روان شهروندان؛ نمونه موردی: چهارباغ عباسی اصفهان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، گروه طراحی شهری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
پیاده‌راه‌ها به‌عنوان فضاهای عمومی شهری، نقشی حیاتی در زندگی روزمره شهروندان ایفا می‌کنند. این فضاها فراتر از مسیرهای عبوری بوده و عرصه‌ای برای تعاملات اجتماعی، گذران اوقات فراغت، و تقویت حس تعلق به محیط شهری محسوب می‌شوند. کیفیت طراحی و عناصر منظرین این فضاها می‌تواند بر سلامت روان شهروندان تأثیر قابل توجهی داشته باشد. محور تاریخی و فرهنگی چهارباغ عباسی اصفهان، به‌عنوان یکی از شاخص‌ترین معابر پیاده‌راهی و نمادهای شهری، در این زمینه اهمیت ویژه‌ای دارد. این پژوهش با هدف مدل‌یابی برهم‌کنش عناصر منظرین پیاده‌راه و سلامت روان شهروندان، این محور را مورد بررسی قرار داده است. جامعه آماری شامل شهروندانی است که به‌طور مستمر از این محور استفاده می‌کنند. نمونه‌ پژوهش به‌صورت تصادفی انتخاب و حجم آن شامل 150 نفر است. داده‌ها با استفاده از پرسشنامه سلامت عمومی (GHQ-28) و پرسشنامه محقق ساخته گردآوری شده‌اند. از مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری به‌منظور تحلیل روابط میان متغیرهای مستقل (عناصر منظرین) و وابسته (شاخص‌های سلامت روان)، در محیط نرم‌افزار Smart PLS استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهد که مدل نهایی بدست آمده در این پژوهش برازش مناسب داشته و عناصر منظرین شامل عناصر حسی- تجربی، عناصر فضایی-پویشی، عناصر عملکردی-پشتیبانی، عناصر اجتماعی-فرهنگی، عناصر محیطی- اکولوژیکی به‌طور معناداری بر سلامت روان تأثیرگذار هستند. یافته‌ها همچنین بر اهمیت بهبود طراحی و ارتقای کیفیت عناصر منظرین به‌منظور کاهش اضطراب و استرس و افزایش حس بهزیستی روانی تأکید دارند. مدل پیشنهادی این پژوهش می‌تواند به‌عنوان راهنمایی برای طراحان شهری، معماران منظر و مدیران شهری در جهت ارتقای کیفیت فضاهای عمومی و بهبود سلامت روان شهروندان به‌کار گرفته شود.

چکیده تصویری

مدل‌یابی برهم کنش عناصر منظرین پیاده‌راه و سلامت روان شهروندان؛ نمونه موردی: چهارباغ عباسی اصفهان

تازه های تحقیق

- مدل‌سازی تأثیر عناصر منظر مسیرهای پیاده‌روی بر سلامت روان شهروندان.
- نقش کلیدی عناصر منظر کارکردی-حمایتی در سلامت روان.
- چارچوب عملی برای ادغام سلامت روان در طراحی فضاهای عمومی شهری.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Modeling the impact of pedestrian promenade landscape elements and citizens’ mental health; Case study: Chaharbagh-e-Abbasi, Isfahan

نویسنده English

Fatemeh Jam
Assistant Professor, Department of urban design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Design, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Pedestrian paths are essential components of urban public spaces, serving much more than just transit routes. They offer platforms for social interactions, recreational activities, and help foster a sense of connection and attachment to the urban environment. The quality of design and landscape elements in these spaces can significantly impact the mental health of city dwellers. The historical and cultural Chaharbagh-e-Abbasi Street in Isfahan, one of the most iconic pedestrian pathways and urban symbols, holds particular significance in this context. This research aims to model the interaction between the landscape elements of pedestrian paths and citizens’ mental health. It investigates how sensory, spatial, functional, socio-cultural, and environmental dimensions can contribute to stress reduction, enhance emotional resilience, and improve psychological well-being.
Methods: This study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining both theoretical and empirical methodologies. The research sample consisted of 150 regular users of the pedestrian path, selected through random sampling. Data collection was carried out using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) to assess psychological well-being, and a researcher-designed questionnaire to evaluate perceptions of landscape elements. The data analysis employed Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using Smart PLS software to determine the relationships between the independent variables (landscape elements) and the dependent variable (mental health indicators). The landscape elements were categorized into five dimensions: sensory-experiential, spatial-dynamic, functional-supportive, social-cultural, and environmental-ecological, with each dimension encompassing specific criteria and observable variables.
Findings: In this model, the path coefficients represent the intensity and direction of the influence between the latent variables (constructs). The path coefficient of 0.552 between the pedestrian path landscape and mental health indicates a direct, positive, and statistically significant impact, though moderate in strength. This suggests that the quality of pedestrian path landscape design positively influences the mental health of citizens. The highest path coefficient (0.853) is observed between the pedestrian path landscape and the functional-supportive dimension, highlighting its key role in the design and spatial organization of pedestrian environments. Other dimensions also show significant effects, including the socio-cultural dimension, with a path coefficient of 0.842, confirming its role in fostering social interactions and a sense of belonging. The spatial-dynamic dimension, with a path coefficient of 0.754, emphasizes the importance of spatial organization and accessibility in pedestrian path design. The sensory-experiential dimension, with a path coefficient of 0.724, reflects its essential role in shaping users’ psychological and emotional experiences. Finally, the environmental-ecological dimension, with a path coefficient of 0.704, underscores the importance of integrating environmental sustainability and natural elements into landscape design.
In the proposed model, the R² values indicate the proportion of variance explained by the independent variables for each construct. The R² value for mental health is 0.301, meaning that 30% of the variation in mental health can be explained by the landscape elements of pedestrian paths. The functional-supportive dimension has the highest R² value (0.875), reaffirming its crucial role in landscape design. Other dimensions also demonstrate substantial R² values, including the socio-cultural dimension (0.709), the spatial-dynamic dimension (0.668), the sensory-experiential dimension (0.524), and the environmental-ecological dimension (0.564), reinforcing their significance in shaping pedestrian path landscapes.
Conclusion: Numerous studies have emphasized the impact of the built environment on individuals’ mental health, examining the relationship between landscape elements and urban settings through various indicators and analytical approaches. This research, through a literature review and expert consultation, classifies the key landscape elements affecting mental health in the Chaharbagh-e-Abbasi pedestrian path in Isfahan into five primary categories: sensory-experiential, spatial-dynamic, functional-supportive, socio-cultural, and environmental-ecological elements. The results indicate that functional-supportive, socio-cultural, and environmental-ecological factors significantly influence the quality of pedestrian path landscapes and act as key dimensions affecting users’ mental health. The strong relationship between the functional-supportive dimension and pedestrian path landscape quality highlights the necessity of improving functionality and support structures in pedestrian spaces to enhance user experience and psychological well-being.
Enhancing the spatial-dynamic, sensory-experiential, socio-cultural, and environmental-ecological dimensions, in order of priority, can be an effective step toward improving the pedestrian path landscape and the mental health of users. The findings of this research suggest that improving the landscape conditions of urban pedestrian paths should be regarded as a fundamental priority in urban planning and design policies. A comprehensive, user-centered approach to public space design can contribute not only to physical and mental well-being but also to strengthening social identity and interpersonal interactions. Such measures can play a crucial role in creating sustainable, livable, and health-oriented cities, providing urban policymakers and designers with practical tools to enhance the quality of public spaces.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Mental Health
Landscape Elements
Pedestrian Path
Modeling
Chaharbagh-e-Abbasi Isfahan
  1. Abraham, A., Sommerhalder, K. & Abel, T. (2010). Landscape and well-being: a scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments. Int J Public Health 55, 59–69.
  2. Alattar, M. A., Cottrill, C., & Beecroft, M. (2021). Sources and applications of emerging active travel data: A review of the literature. Sustainability, 13(13), 7006.
  3. Amoozadeh Lichaei, A., Ebizadeh, S. (2022), Analyzing the Factors Affecting the Promotion of the Vitality of Public Spaces by Emphasizing the Role of Urban Arts from the Perspective of Citizens;Case Study: Cultural Walkway of Rasht Municipality, Journal of Research and Urban Planning, 13 (48): 121-136.
  4. Arefi, M., & Aelbrecht, P. (2023), Urban design and walkability revisited. Urban Design International, 28, 1-2.
  5. Babri Dehmajnoni, B., Moghadasi, Mm., & Dezhdar, O. (2021). The effect of physical and activity factors on creating sensory qualities in urban pedestrian ways (Case study: Kermanshah Taq-e Botan pedestrian way). Iranian Architecture and Urbanism, 12(1), 191-205.
  6. Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 103168.
  7. Cao S, Song C, Jiang S, Luo H, Zhang P, Huang Y, Yu J, Li K, Li N, Guo B, et al. (2024), Effects of Urban Greenway Environmental Types and Landscape Characteristics on Physical and Mental Health Restoration. Forests, 15(4):679.
  8. Farajzadeh, M., Valizadeh, R., Babaei Aghdam, F., Panahi, A., & Azar, A. (2021). Identifying Constituent Elements of Urban Pedestrian Paths Based on Citizens' Sensory Perceptions: A Case Study of Tabriz's Tabriz and Vali Asr Pedestrian Paths. New Approaches in Human Geography, 2(13), 43-59.
  9. Ghanbari, A., Hadi,E., Hadi,E. (2020). Comparative Study of Valiasr and Tarbiat Walkways in Tabriz in terms of Walking Oriented Components. Quarterly Journal of Environmental Based Territorial Planning, 50(13),85-110.
  10. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  11. Hjelle, E. G., Bragstad, L. K., Zucknick, M., Kirkevold, M., Thommessen, B., & Sveen, U. (2019). The General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) as an outcome measurement in a randomized controlled trial in a Norwegian stroke population. BMC Psychology, 7(18).
  12. Isaacs, A. N., & Mitchell, E. K. L. (2024). Mental health integrated care models in primary care and factors that contribute to their effective implementation: A scoping review. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 18(5).
  13. LaJeunesse, S., Ryus, P., Kumfer, W., Kothuri, S., & Nordback, K. (2021). Measuring Pedestrian Level of Stress in Urban Environments: Naturalistic Walking Pilot Study. Transportation Research Record, 2675(10), 109–119.
  14. Lin, J., & Brown, R. D. (2021). Integrating microclimate into landscape architecture for outdoor thermal comfort: A systematic review. Land, 10(2), 196.
  15. Lupala, J. M. (2015). Landscape Elements as Determinants of Pedestrian Movement in Urban Public Spaces: The Case of Dodoma, Tanzania. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 14(2),113-128.
  16. Ma, J., Lin, P., & Williams, J. (2024). Effectiveness of nature-based walking interventions in improving mental health in adults: a systematic review. Current Psychology, 43, 9521–9539.
  17. Manwell, L. A., Barbic, S. P., Roberts, K., Durisko, Z., Lee, C., Ware, E., & McKenzie, K. (2015). What is mental health? Evidence towards a new definition from a mixed methods multidisciplinary international survey. BMJ Open, 5(e007079).
  18. Patel, S., Jabbour, N., John, D., Ahmad, A. M., Furlan, R., Al-Matwi, R., & Isaifan, R. J. (2024). The impact of urban design on mental well-being by integrating green spaces in Doha City, Qatar. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(3), 3147.
  19. Payab, E., Khatibie, M. R., Soltanzadeh, H., & Moeinifar, M. (2020). Analysis and assessment of urban walkways with emphasis on health dimensions (Case study: Hamadan Ekbatan walkway). Geography (Regional Planning), 10(1), 131-141.
  20. Pourahmad, A., Farhadi, E., Ghorbani, R., & Doorudinia, A. (2018). The Impact of Urban Prospects on Mental Health of Citizens (Case study: 2nd and 9th regions of Tehran). Sustainable city, 1(3), 17-33.
  21. Sadeghpoor, F., Ranjbar, E., Esmaeilinasab, M., Valiloo, M. H. S., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2024). Streets and Stress: A Pilot Study on How Quality and Design of Streets Impacts on Urban Stress. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 17(1), 224-248.
  22. Shahmoradi, S., Abtahi, S. M., & Guimarães, P. (2023). Pedestrian street and its effect on economic sustainability of a historical Middle Eastern city: The case of Chaharbagh Abbasi in Isfahan, Iran. Geography and Sustainability4(3), 188-199.
  23. Shamai, A., & Usefi, S. (2017). Evaluation of urban development plans from the perspective of citizens Case of study: Pedestrian construction of Salman Farsi Street, Ahvaz. Geography, 15(53), 112-132.
  24. Sundling, C., & Jakobsson, M. (2023). How Do Urban Walking Environments Impact Pedestrians’ Experience and Psychological Health? A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 15(10817).
  25. Tabaeian, A., Daneshpour, S. A., & Khalili, A. (2021). A Model of Intervention and Spatial Policy-making System for Urban Pedestrian Streets. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 9(2), 287-311. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.319849.147.
  26. Wagner, R., & Grimm, M.S. (2023). Empirical Validation of the 10-Times Rule for SEM. In: Radomir, L., Ciornea, R., Wang, H., Liu, Y., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (eds) State of the Art in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham.
  27. Wedyan, M., & Saeidi-Rizi, F. (2024). Assessing the impact of urban environments on mental health and perception using deep learning: A review and text mining analysis. Journal of Urban Health, 101(2), 327–343.
  28. Westenhöfer, J., Nouri, E., Reschke, M. L., Seebach, F., & Buchcik, J. (2023). Walkability and urban built environments—a systematic review of health impact assessments (HIA). BMC Public Health, 23, 518.
  29. Zhang, F., Sun, X., Liu, C., & Qiu, B. (2024). Effects of urban landmark landscapes on residents’ place identity: The moderating role of residence duration. Sustainability, 16(2), 761.

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 اردیبهشت 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 14 تیر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 07 شهریور 1403