تأثیر تدقیق موضوع هندسه بر تبیین محتوای آموزش آن در معماری مبتنی بر منابع اسلامی

نوع مقاله : برگرفته از رساله دکتری

نویسندگان

1 پژوهشگر دکترای معماری، گروه معماری، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه معماری، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

10.30475/isau.2025.455795.2153
چکیده
آموزش یکی از موضوعات مهم در جریان شکوفایی معماری بوده و توجه به مباحث هندسه به‌عنوان شاخه‌ای از ریاضیات و یکی از عوامل مؤثر در شکل‌گیری فضای معماری ایرانی، خصوصاً در عصر اسلامی، همواره در میان دروس پایۀ این رشته قرار داشته و از اولویت‌های نظام آموزشی آن می‌باشد. در این پژوهش، با توجه به اهمیت باطن پدیده‌ها در شکل‌گیری و پیشبرد علوم در جهان‌بینی اسلامی و اولویت نگـرش در یادگیری در رویکرد شناختی، پرسش‌های ذیل مطرح می‌شوند؛ چیستی مفهوم واژۀ هندسه و کاربرد آن در معماری؟، و چگونگی تأثیر مفهوم واژۀ هندسه در معماری بر محتوای آموزشی آن؟ در پژوهش کیفی ذیل که با استفاده از روش توصیفی- تحلیلی انجام شده و داده‌ها از طریق مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و مبتنی بر منابع اسلامی جمع‌آوری می‌شوند، جهت پاسخ به پرسش اول، با بهره‌گیری از استدلال منطقی، برداشت‌های موجود از واژۀ هندسه و مفهوم آن در معماری طبقه‌بندی، انتظامات هندسی- معماری معرفی و با کمک استدلال استنتاجی واژۀ «هَنْدَسَه» معادل واژۀ «قَدَر» در نظر گرفته شده و مفهوم آن در معماری ارائه می‌گردد. همچنین درمی‌یابیم که شناخت ناقص حاصل از گستردگی دامنۀ مفهوم واژۀ هندسه، زمینه‌ساز وجود برداشت‌ها و کاربردهای متعدد آن در معماری شده که جهت رفع این مشکل کاربرد «انتظام هندسی- معماری انسجام‌بخش»، پیشنهاد می‌شود. برای پاسخ به پرسش دوم، با کمک استدلال منطقی، دروس دانشگاهی، نظریات حکمای مسلمان، رده‌ها و رویکردهای آموزشی و پژوهشی موجود پیرامون مفهوم هندسه در معماری، با یکدیگر تطبیق داده و با کمک استدلال استنتاجی، سرفصل‌ها مبتنی بر سه رویکرد؛ اکتشافی- توصیفی، تحلیلی- تفسیری و علّی، تدوین می‌شوند.

تازه های تحقیق

- تعریف واژۀ «هَنْدَسَه» به لحاظ معنایی معادل واژۀ «قَدَر».
- شناخت ناقص حاصل از گستردگی دامنۀ مفهوم واژۀ «هندسه»، زمینه‌ساز وجود برداشت‌ها و کاربردهای متعدد آن در معماری. 
- تدوین سرفصل‌های آموزش هندسه در معماری، مطابق نظریات حکمای مسلمان.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Effect of Determining the Subject of Geometry on the Explanation of its Educational Content in Architecture Based on Islamic Sources

نویسندگان English

Abbas Dahbashipur 1
Saeid Alitajer 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture, Department of architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: The existence of numerous examples of the connection between the knowledge of geometry and building design, with an emphasis on the application of geometry in architecture, especially in the Islamic era, introduces architecture as a knowledge-based skill that creates an extended connection between thought and action. The breadth of this connection has created numerous definitions of the concept of geometry and its diverse applications in architecture. Due to the importance of paying attention to the internal aspects of phenomena in the formation and advancement of sciences in the Islamic worldview, it is essential to understand the concept of geometry in architecture. With the aim of providing a single definition of the concept of the word geometry for the emergence and manifestation of its capabilities in architecture, the first research question, “What is the meaning of the word geometry and its application in architecture?”, is formed on the assumption that the numerous existing interpretations of the concept of the word geometry create diverse applications of geometry in architecture. Considering that the theoretical and practical topics of geometry were taught to architects in the past by Muslim philosophers and mathematicians, and today, architects are trained in architectural schools, with the aim of compiling the necessary syllabus for teaching the clarified subject of geometry to architects, the second research question, “How does the concept of the word geometry in architecture affect its educational content?”, is formed on the assumption that introducing the subject of geometry to architects based on its clarified concept in this research, reveals the need to compile educational syllabuses that cover various areas of the aforementioned concept.
Methods: This research is conducted using a descriptive-analytical method and with the help of qualitative content analysis. Data are collected through library studies and by deductive method. In order to enter the field of research, Often from Islamic sources, well-referenced scientific articles and authentic books have been selected that are related to the subject and whose authors are experts in the field under investigation. In order to answer the first question, with the help of logical reasoning, we will deal with the epistemological classification and content matching of existing definitions of the concept of the word geometry with existing interpretations of it in architecture. Then, the applications resulting from the aforementioned interpretations are introduced using inference argument. In order to answer the second question, with the help of logical reasoning and considering the clarified subject of geometry, we adapt the syllabus and objectives of basic and optional courses related to geometry education in architecture in terms of content with the theories of Muslim scholars from the fourth to the eleventh centuries AH. Then, using inference argument, the materials needed for teaching are discovered.
Findings: According to studies, the word “Geometry” is defined as equivalent to the word “Qadar” in the sense of (certain size) which is understood in the three realms of measurement, proportion, and exaltation to the higher worlds. Also, the numerous existing interpretations of the concept of geometry in architecture fall into the categories of: ordering, coordinating, and metaphorical, respectively and in accordance with the sub interpretations, applications are introduced under the title of “Geometric-Architectural Layout”. In short, the concept of the word “Geometry” in architecture is an art that has come down from the Supreme World in shapes and sizes in order to fulfill the goals of the building built and the manifestation of the divine names and it has three levels: drawing plane, spatial and analytical-content. In order to benefit from all the aforementioned levels and to achieve the “Secret of Qadar” of the building, an application called “Unifying Geometrical-Architectural Layout” is proposed. It should be noted that just as the aforementioned layouts are different in nature, the educational and research strategies of geometry in architecture are also different from each other. In the educational model proposed by Muslim philosophers, geometry is a tool for realizing Islamic life, in which the concept of “Kail” is used to promote and improve the relationship between man and the environment.
Conclusion: Using inference argument, we find out that knowing the concept of the word “Geometry” in an incomplete form due to its wide scope, has become the basis for the existence of many interpretations and, as a result, the numerous applications of the concept of geometry in architecture. In fact, each architect uses a part of the concept of geometry in architecture according to her needs and thus numerous geometric-architectural Layouts are formed and the first hypothesis of the research is confirmed. Next, while matching the content of the levels of the concept of the word “Geometry” in architecture with the content resulting from summarizing the components of the theories of Muslim philosophers and the selected goals and headings appropriate to these goals, using logical reasoning, we compile syllabuses for teaching the clarified subject of geometry in architecture, and we also classify them according to the content of educational and research approaches: exploratory-descriptive, analytical-interpretive and causal and thus the second hypothesis of the research is also confirmed.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Geometry
Qadar
Geometric-Architectural Layout
Muslim philosophers
Syllabus

این مقاله برگرفته از رساله دکتری نویسنده نخست با عنوان «تدقیق موضوع هندسه در معماری و ارائۀ راهکارهای آموزش سرفصل‌های منتج از آن، در جهت تقویت مهارت هندسی» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم در دانشگاه بوعلی سینا انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s doctoral thesis entitled “Clarifying the subject of geometry in architecture and providing solutions for teaching the topics resulting from it, in order to strengthen geometric skill”, supervised by the second author, at Bu-Ali Sina University.

  1. Aghapour Baynuji, A. (2009). A study of First-year high school students' misunderstandings in math lesson. master’s thesis. Islamic Azad University Kerman Branch, Kerman, Iran. [In Persian]
  2. Akbari, F., Pournamdarian, T., Shirazi, A. A. & Ayatollahi, H. (2010). Spiritual knowledge and geometric symbols (extracted from the doctoral thesis: interpretation of geometric symbols in Islamic culture and art of Iran). Persian language and literature, Gohar Goya, 4 (1), 1-22. [In Persian]
  3. Alahbdashti, A. (2004). Anthropology (Knowing reason in the light of reason and narration). Philosophical Theological Research, 5(19), 17-42. [In Persian]
  4. Aliabadi, M. (2022). “Geometry” (in Islam) is “al-Qadr” and “The Living Heart/Mind of Artists, Architects, Craftsmen and Engineers” is “the Laylat al-Qadr”. Iranian Architecture Studies, 11(21), 249-264. [In Persian]
  5. Alitajer, S. & Sajadi Hezave, S. I. (2018). Effects of Learning Descriptive Geometry on Spatial Capacity in Architecture Colleges. Architecture and Urban planning, 10(20), 129-146. [In Persian]
  6. Ashraf Nahand, A. and Khodaverdi Jafari. (2017). Investigating the readability of geometric patterns (proportions) in the architecture of the three great civilizations of the Middle East (logical reasoning). International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Planning of Contemporary Iran. Tehran: University College of Osveh (Tehran) and Shahid Beheshti University. [In Persian]
  7. Balkhari Qahi, H. (2010). The geometry of imagination and beauty, a research on the opinions of Akhwan al-Safa about the wisdom of art and beauty. Tehran: Matn Institute for the compilation, translation and publication of artistic works. [In Persian]
  8. Balkhari Qahi, H. (2017). Philosophy, geometry and architecture. Tehran: University of Tehran, Institute of Printing and Publishing. [In Persian]
  9. Biruni Khwarazmi, A. R. M. (1983). Al-Tafhim (for the early astrology industry). In J. Homai (Ed.), Tehran: Babak. (Original work published 1619). [In Persian]
  10. Bozorgmehri, Z. (2006). Geometry in architecture. Tehran: Sabahan Noor, Cultural Heritage Organization of the country. [In Persian]
  11. Cooper, D. E. (1997). Oxford (Aesthetics). Oxford: Black well publishers.
  12. Danchenko, L. & Tuktamyshov, N. (2020). A modified design-analog method of teaching geometry and graphics as a means of integrating of training and design activities of future architects. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.
  13. Dehkhoda, A. A. (1998). Dictionary. Tehran: Rozeneh, University of Tehran Printing and Publishing Institute. [In Persian]
  14. Efendi, C. (2010). Risale-yi mimariye (A text from the 11th century AH). (M. Qayyoomi ‌Bidhendi, Trans.). Tehran: Matn Institute for the compilation, translation and publication of artistic works. [In Persian]
  15. Fakhouri, H. & Georr, Kh. (1994). History of philosophy in the Islamic world. (A. Aiati, Trans.). Tehran: Elmifarhangi. [In Persian]
  16. Farabi, A. N. M. (2002). Ehsaul uloom (H. Khadivjam, Trans.). Tehran: Elmifarhangi. (Original work published Fourth century AH). [In Persian]
  17. Farshad, M. (1986). History of science in Iran. First volume. Tehran: Amir Kabir. [In Persian]
  18. Farshchian, A. H., Nejad Ebrahimi, A. and GharehBaglou, M. (2022). Islamic Architects and Islamic Mathematicians Artistics Meeting, To Utilize Geometry in Architecture The period under study is the fourth to the eleventh AH. Researches in Islamic Architecture, 10(4), 82-105. [In Persian]
  19. Foruzandeh, N., Kiani Deh Kiani, Gh. R. & Heidari Bani, D. (2015). The role of geometry and proportion in the creation of traditional Iranian architectural spaces, case study: Khan Zanian Caravanserai, Fars Province. The International Conference on Human, Architecture, Civil Engineering and City. Tabriz. [In Persian]
  20. Ghavami, F. R. (2017). Interactive Arts and Academic Education (A Study of the Interactive Arts Curriculum at Manchester School of Art Based on a Cognitive Approach). University Textbooks; Research and Writing, 21(40), 94-122. [In Persian]
  21. Good, C. V. (1973). Dictionary of Education. New York: Macram, Hill books Company.
  22. Guenon, R. (2005). Le Regne de la quantite et les signes des temps (A. M. Kardan, Trans.). Tehran: Academic Publishing Center. (Original work published 1970). [In Persian]
  23. Hassanzadeh Amoli (Allamah), H. (1984). Eleven treatises on philosophy, logic and mysticism. First volume. Zendegi Publishing, Institute of Cultural Studies and Research. Retrieved January 21, 2023, from https://lib.eshia.ir/10922/1/594. [In Persian]
  24. Hojat, E. (2013). Evolution of the architectural education in Iran, from chest to chest education to shoulder to shoulder education. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 14(56), 37-53. [In Persian]
  25. Honari, A. R. (2021). Analyzing the compatibility of symbolism with the two bases of the originality of existence and the originality of essence. Contemporary Wisdom, 11(2), 243-263. [In Persian]
  26. Ibn Arabi, Sh. A. M. (2004). Conquests of Mecca in understanding the secrets of ownership and property. First volume. Chapter 1-4. (Translation and research by M. Khajawi). Tehran: Mullah. (Original work published 1820). [In Persian]
  27. Ibn Sina, A. A. (1996). Al-Isharat wa’l-tanbihat. (Interpreted by H. Malekshahi), First volume. Tehran: Soroush. (Original work published Fifth century AH). [In Persian]
  28. Ikhwan al-Safa wa Khollan al-wafa. (2020). The Treatises of the Ikhwan al-Safa wa Khollan al-wafa (Hesab wa al-Handeseh). Manuscript (Not included in the dated version). Tehran: National Library of Iran. [In Arabic]
  29. Kaplan, C. S. (2002). Computer Graphics and Geometric Ornamental Design. PhD diss., Washington Univ.
  30. Kashani. Gh. J. (2020). Treatise on angle and al-Gebra. Manuscript (Not included in the dated version). Tehran: National Library of Iran. [In Arabic]
  31. Khaki Ghasr, A. & Pour Mehdi Ghayem Maghami, H. (2018). Analyze of an educational experience at courses of architecture in first year of education (referring to nature in case of sunflower exercise). Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba (Architecture and Urban Planning), 23(1), 93-104. [In Persian]
  32. Mahdavinejad, M. J. (2004). The wisdom of Iran's Islamic architecture, searching in the deep spiritual structures of Iran's Islamic architecture. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba, 19(19), 57-66. [In Persian]
  33. Maheronnaghsh, M. (2002). Bricks their usage. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
  34. Majdi, Sh. & Farazjo, F. (2013). Extracting the concept of geometry from the verses of the Quran and the relationship between geometry and Islamic architecture. The second national conference of Islamic architecture and urban planning. Tabriz. [In Persian]
  35. Mohaghegh, M. (2001). A review of the history of mathematics during the time of Abu al-Wafa Buzjani. Nameh-Ye-Anjoman, (1), 58-65. [In Persian]
  36. Mohamadianmansoor, S., Nadimi, H. and Tafazzoli, Z. (2020). A Theory about Geometric Orders ofIranian Architecture. Pazhohesh-Ha-Ye Bastanshenasi Iran, 10(24), 227-249. [In Persian]
  37. Mohammadi Malayeri, M. (2006). Iran's history and culture during the transition from the Sassanid era to the Islamic era. Fourth volume. Tehran: Toos. [In Persian]
  38. Moin, M. (2003). Moin Encyclopedic Dictionary. Fourth volume. Tehran: Zarrin. [In Persian]
  39. Mojtahedzadeh, R. (2021). The relationship between architecture and science in Iran during the Islamic era. (With an introduction by M. Qayyoomi Bidhendi). Tehran: Matn Institute for the compilation, translation and publication of artistic works. [In Persian].
  40. Momtahen, M. & Narighomi, M. (2019). A Revision of Geometric Training of Architects from Islamic View. Researches in Islamic Architecture, 6(21), 63-85. [In Persian]
  41. Motahari (Martyr Professor), M. (2019). The subject of cognition. Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
  42. Motiei, B.,  Mehdizadeh Saradj, F. & Bayzidi, Q. (2020). Simultaneous Teaching of Basic Architecture Courses: A Factor Affecting Students’ Academic Motivation; Case Study: The Contents of Practical Geometry. Arman Shahr, 12(29), 199-210. [In Persian]
  43. Nadimi, H. (1996). Conceptualizing a framework for integrity in architectural education: with some references to Iran. PhD diss., Institute of the advanced architectural studies, University of York.
  44. Nadimi, H. (1999). Haqiqateh Naqsh (The truth of the design). A collection of articles of the Second Congress of the History of Architecture and Urban Planning of Iran. Second volume. Tehran: Cultural Heritage Organization of the country (Research institute). [In Persian]
  45. Nadimi, H. (2006). Kelke doost. Isfahan: Isfahan Municipal Cultural and Entertainment Organization. [In Persian]
  46. Necipoglu, G. (2008). The Topkapi Scroll-Geometry and Ornament in Islamic Architecture (M. Qayoumi Bidhandi, Trans.). Tehran: Rowzaneh. (Original work published 1996). [In Persian]
  47. Nejad Ebrahimi, A., GharehBaglou, M. & Frashchian. A. H. (2021). The Place of Theoretical Wisdom in the Application of Architectural Geometry by Islamic Mathematicians, The Period under Study of the Fourth to Eleventh Centuries AH. Contemporary Wisdom, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, 12(1), 269-309. [In Persian]
  48. Noghrekar, A. (2008). An introduction to Islamic art in architecture and urban planning. Tehran: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development. [In Persian]
  49. Noghrekar, A. (2011). Human interaction with spatial-geometrical ideas in architecture, theorizing treatise. Tehran: Center of Excellence in Islamic Architecture. [In Persian]
  50. Okane, B. (1987). Timurid Architecture in Kharasan. Costa Mesa: Mazdâ Publishers in association with Undena Publications.
  51. Omoumi, M. (1997). Architecture: pattern order. Isfahan: Khak. [In Persian]
  52. Ostwald, M. J. (2015). Ethics and Geometry: Computational Transformations and the Curved Surface in Architecture. In K. Williams & M. J. Ostwald (Ed.), Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future, Volume II, The 1500s to the Future. Basel: Birkhuser.
  53. Pirnia, M. K. (1990). Textbook of Islamic architecture 1. Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Persian]
  54. Qumayr, Y. (2005). Ikhwan al-Safa, Shiite intellectuals (M. S. Sajjadi, Trans.). Tehran: phalsapheh. [In Persian]
  55. Rahnamaei, S. A. (2010). Western studies: An overview of the cultural and political developments of the West from ancient Greece to the end of the second millennium. Qom: Publishing Center of Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. [In Persian]
  56. Reyhani, E., Emam jome, Saleh Sedghpour, B. & Moradi, A. (2011). Assessing mathematics teachers’ knowledge of geometry based on Van Hiele Model of Geometric Thought. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 5(1), 67-79. [In Persian]
  57. Romi, Kh. (1475). Treatise on Weights, Quantities, and Arithmetic. Compiled by B. Servatian, (2005). Culture of Iran, Volume 30, 112-186. [In Persian]
  58. Ryle, G. (1980). The Concept of Mind. Harmondworth: Penguin Books.
  59. Seyf, A. A. (1998). Educational psychology. Tehran: Payam-e Noor University. [In Persian]
  60. Sharifzadeh, A. (2009). Geometry of motifs. Tehran: Iran textbook publishing. [In Persian]
  61. Supreme Council for Educational Planning. (2016). Bachelor of Architecture Engineering Curriculum. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University. [In Persian]
  62. Tabasi, M. and Khosh navafoomani, S. (2019). The effect of hierarchy in the physical environment on improving user perception. The third international conference on architecture, civil engineering, agriculture and environment. Sofia-Bulgaria: Permanent Secretariat of the Conference. [In Persian]
  63. Tabatabai (Allamah), S. M. H. (1995). Al-Mizan fi tafsir Al-Quran (S. M. Bagher Mousavi Hamedani, Trans.). Volumes 5, 19&20. Qom: Islamic Publications Office of Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. (Original work published 1971). [In Persian]
  64. Taheri, J. & Nadimi, H. (2014). The Hidden Dimension in Persian Islamic Architecture. Soffeh, 24(65), 5-24. [In Persian]
  65. Taqvai, V. (2007). Hidden space system of Iranian architecture and its structure. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba, 30(30), 43-52. [In Persian]
  66. Tavassoli, M. (2004). The art of geometry: dynamics of shapes, spherical volumes Abu al-Wafa Buzjani. Tehran: Payam. [In Persian]
  67. Thagard, P. (2005). Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science. London: the MIT press.
  68. The Holy Quran
  69. Toosi, Kh. N. (7th century AH). The beginning and the conclusion. (Introduction and commentary by H. Ayatollah Hassnzadih Amuli), (1995). Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, Printing and Publishing Organization. Retrieved January 21, 2023, from https://lib.eshia.ir/71436/1/0. [In Persian]
  70. Yaqubi, A. (2002). Al-Buldan (M. Ibrahim Aiati, Trans.). Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company. (Original work published 1486). [In Persian]
  71. Zeinali Nasrabadi, F. & Farahza, N. (2022). Overview of structural Education methods for architects an approach to the integration of structural taught in integration with architectural design process. Andisname-ye Memari, 2(3), 113-132. [In Persian]

مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ
انتشار آنلاین از 31 شهریور 1404

  • تاریخ دریافت 16 اردیبهشت 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 28 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 25 مهر 1403