نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری معماری، گروه معماری، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه معماری، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران.

3 دانشیار، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

امروزه فضاهای تجاری معاصر از جمله فضاهای شبه‌عمومی هستند که تنها کارکرد تجاریِ خرید ندارند و با چرخشی فرهنگی به مکانی برای تفریح و فراغت جوانان و بستری اجتماعی برای شکل‌گیری هویت و رفتار آنان تبدیل شده‌اند. از این رو، جوانان یکی از گروه‌های با اهمیت در فضاهای عمومی و شبه‌عمومی هستند که باید به عنوان منبع بزرگی در برنامه‌ریزی‌ها لحاظ شوند. عدم توجه به این گروه سنی جوان می‌تواند پیامدهایی چون افزایش فردیت و هویت‌زدایی را در پی داشته باشد و حتی در مواردی، آن‌ها را با طرد از این گونه فضاها مواجه کند. پژوهش حاضر به دنبال دستیابی به ارزشیابی ویژگی‌های محیطی مراکز خرید معاصر از منظر جوانان با مورد پژوهی مجموعه سیتی سنتر اصفهان است. روش پژوهش در این مقاله توصیفی-ارزیابانه است. این پژوهش همچنین از پژوهش موردی و رویکرد کیفی بهره می‌گیرد. گردآوری داده‌های پژوهش در دو بخش کلی انجام شده است. در بخش اول از خودسنجی در قالب مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته با سؤالات باز و نمونه‌گیری ِهدفمند استفاده شده است. همچنین مصاحبه‌ها تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری، با 20 نفر از جوانان 20 تا 30 سال بازدیدکننده از مجموعه سیتی سنتر اصفهان در چند مرحله ادامه یافته است. به منظور تامین روایی و پایایی پژوهش از سه سویه‌سازی یعنی استفاده توامان از مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و مشاهدات میدانی با شیوه نقشه‌برداری رفتاری استفاده شده است. تحلیل داده‌های مصاحبه با تکنیک تحلیل مضمون و نرم‌افزار اطلس تی آی نسخه 8 و تحلیل داده‌های حاصل از مشاهدات با آمار توصیفی ساده انجام گرفته است. یافته‌های این پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که چهار بعد کالبدی-فضایی، اجتماعی-فرهنگی، کارکردی-فعالیتی و بعد فردی، در چگونگی ارزشیابی جوانان از مجموعه سیتی سنتر اصفهان مؤثر است. 

چکیده تصویری

ارزشیابی ویژگی‌های محیطی فضاهای تجاری معاصر از منظر جوانان؛ موردپژوهی: مجموعه سیتی سنتر اصفهان

تازه های تحقیق

- فضاهای تجاری معاصر از جمله فضاهای شبه عمومی هستند که با چرخشی فرهنگی به مکانی برای تفریح و فراغت جوانان تبدیل شده‌اند.
- ارزشیابی جوانان از محیط مجموعه سیتی سنتر اصفهان، دارای ابعادِ کالبدی- محیطی، کارکردی- فعالیتی، اجتماعی- فرهنگی و روانشناختی- فردی است. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the environmental features of contemporary commercial spaces through youth’s perspective; Case study: Isfahan City Center complex

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sara Sadeghi 1
  • Bahram Shahedi 2
  • Bahador Zamani 3
  • Samar Haghighi Boroojeni 2

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: Contemporary commercial spaces fall under quasi-public spaces, which have long served as the physical platforms of social, economic, and cultural aspects for public life. Today, these spaces are not just confined to commercial functions; rather, they have taken on a cultural turn to turn into places for recreation and leisure of the young people and also social contexts for the formation of their identity and behavior. Also, anthropological developments have changed the man-place and man-man link in the place. In modern society, individual tastes are important, while modernism and change are recognized as the social values of the modern world. Changes made to commercial spaces, on the one hand, and the individual-environment relationship in these spaces, on the other hand, have affected and transformed users’ environmental evaluation criteria of commercial spaces, while creating new challenges and opportunities at the same time. Hence, young people are influential in public and quasi-public spaces, and they should be considered as a large resource in planning processes. The present study aimed to examine the environmental characteristics of contemporary shopping malls from the perspective of the youth by investigating Isfahan City Center Complex as the case study.
Methods: The methodology of this study was descriptive-evaluative. Since people’s evaluation of the environment may vary from one individual to another, it is required to adopt a qualitative and exploratory approach to meet this goal. Hence, the present study used case study strategies and qualitative approaches. Data were collected in two general sections. In the first section, a self-evaluation tool was used for the free expression of beliefs and attitudes in the form of semi-structured open-ended interviews. Interview items and propositions were developed based on the conceptual framework of the study, encompassing people’s holistic assessment of locations, the length of time spent in these locations, their preferences within these environments, the driving factors behind their visits, and their suggestions for alterations, reductions, or additions to these places. In the interviews, purposive sampling was used and the interviews with the youth ranging from 20 to 30, who had visited Isfahan City Center Complex, continued in several stages until theoretical saturation was met. As for the validity and reliability of the study, library sources, field observations and two place- and individual-oriented behavior maps or behavior tracking, along with the interviews, were used. These non-interventional field observations were performed in a macro-level behavioral unit, for which behavioral mapping was provided for ten days with the presence of the observer at Isfahan City Center Complex in March 2020.  Also, interview data were analyzed using Theme Analysis Technique and Atlas TI 8 Software, while observation data were analyzed by simple descriptive statistics.
Findings: All open codes and categories were extracted from interviews and analyzed, as only the final criteria were provided in the form of findings following the investigation of indicators and field observations. These observations were collected for each behavioral center at three-time intervals, while group movements and behaviors were outlined in the form of lines in separate maps; after this, all tracking maps were outlined in the form of a combined map resulting from an overlap of single tracking. In the next step, the validity of the expressions made within the self-evaluation tools, the indicators resulting from responses and their divergence from and convergence with what occurs in field observations were examined and interpreted. Accordingly, the youths’ evaluation of the Isfahan City Center Complex involves a variety of physical-environmental, functional-activity, social-cultural, and individual-psychological dimensions. Each of these dimensions has indicators that sometimes overlap, and are finally presented in the form of theoretical models.
Conclusion: Findings revealed that commercial spaces at Isfahan City Center Complex are affected by the environmental factors across physical, functional-activity, social-cultural, and individual dimensions. Consequently, these factors have reshaped the complex, turning it into a quasi-public space characterized by diverse social and cultural interactions. As a result, new commercial space experiences have emerged, particularly for young individuals. In addition, non-environmental economic factors, marketing and managerial factors, complex maintenance, sales festivals and customer affairs and services affect young peoples’ evaluation. Thus, planners and officials are required to consider physical, functional and social changes to affect the quantity and quality of mandatory, voluntary and social behavioral patterns in spaces. Considering physical structures proportionate to some voluntary behaviors, interactive social behaviors and social partnerships, such as creating spatial diversity, along with intermediary spaces and natural views, creating a system of interactive equipment and furniture to create official and non-official sitting opportunities, creating unofficial and flexible collective spaces using decorations, local elements and symbols for holding ceremonies, and establishing social, religious and national festivals and ceremonies, which conform to our culture in local market samples, could contribute to this goal. In this regard, it is essential to use collaborative approaches between young users and space officials in designing and planning contemporary commercial spaces, such as Isfahan City Center Complex. In the end, concerning commercial spaces planning, it is required to strike a balance between preserving elements from local cultures and historical spaces, as seen in traditional examples, and incorporating these elements into contemporary contexts.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Mental Evaluative Image
  • Environmental Features
  • Contemporary Commercial Spaces
  • Youth
  • Isfahan City Center Complex

این مقاله برگرفته از رساله دکتری نویسنده نخست با عنوان «ارزشیابی ویژگی‌های محیطی فضاهای تجاری معاصر از منظر جوانان (موردپژوهی: مجموعه سیتی سنتر اصفهان)» می‌باشد که به راهنمایی نویسنده دوم و سوم و مشاوره نویسنده چهارم در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، انجام گرفته است.

This article is derived from the first author`s doctoral thesis entitled “Evaluating the environmental features of   contemporary commercial spaces through Youth`s perspective (case study: Isfahan City Center Complex)”, supervised by the second and third authors and advised by the fourth, at Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) branch.

  1. Abbasi, Zahra. Habib, Farah. Z, Mokhtabad Amroii, Seyyed Mostafa. (2018). The new interpretation of sensory perception in Iranian-Islamic architecture of bazaar: A Case Study of Bazaar of Kashan. Journal of Theoretical Studies and Modern Technologies of Architecture and Urban Planning, (2), 81-90 [In Persian].
  2. Adhami, Jamal, Ahmadi, Yaghoub, Jafari, Ebrahim. (2017). Study the inter-generation value preferences and their effective social factors in Sanandaj. Social Sciences, (118), 78-156 [In Persian].
  3. Akbari, Morteza, Ghafoorian, Fatemeh Sadat. (2019). Analysis of qualitative data using Atlas.ti8 software. Tehran University Press: 77 [In Persian].
  4. and the post- modern city, progress in human Geography. (11),354-78.
  5. Bahrami, Bakhtiar, Khosravi, Arash. (2015). Assessment factors in improving the quality of pedestrian circulation in and out of the urban shopping centers (Case Study: Kurdistan Commercial Complex-Sanandaj). Journal of Fine Arts- Architecture and Urban Planning, (1), 91-100 [In Persian].
  6. Bakker, I., Voordt, TVD., Boon, JD., Vink, P. (2014). Pleasure, arousal, dominance: mehrabian and Russell Revisited.Courrent Psychology.33(3),405-421.
  7. Barker, R.G(1968),Ecological Psychology:Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto,CA,USA.
  8. Bawa, R., Kishore S., Anil, KR. (2019). Emerging Mall Culture and Shopping Behavior of Young Consumers. Advances in Anthropology, (9), 125-150.
  9. Benjamin,W. (2003). The Arcades Project. Translated by Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin, The Belknap Press of Harvard University press, Press, USA.
  10. Carmona, Matthew Hitt, Tim, Tanrock, Steven, Tiesdell. (2009). Public places, urban spaces, and the dimensions of urban design. Trans: Fariba Gharaee, Mahshid Shokouhi, Zahra Ahari, Esmaeel Salehi, Tehran: Tehran Art University Press.
  11. Carmona, Matthew, Tiesdell, Steven (2011). Reading concepts of urban design. Trans: Kamran Zekavat and Farnaz Farshad. Tehran: Azarakhsh Publications
  12. Carr, S., Francis, M., Ravlin, L.G. and Stone, A.M. (1992). ̒Need in Public Space˝ from Carr, S., et al. (1992), Public Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 87-136.
  13. Coolen, h. (2008). the meaning of dwelling features, Conceptual and methodological issues. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  14. Dee, Mike, (2015). Young People and Urban Public Space in Australia-Creating Pathways to Community, Belonging and Inclusion. International Journal of Social Science Reasearch 3(2).
  15. Dejdar, Omid, Talischi, Gholamreza, Roohi Dehkordi, Rahman. (2012). Behavior settings concept recognition: a review of definitions and specifications of behavior setting with an emphasis on Schoggen's texts' analytical review. Journal of Environmental Studies, (1), 13-20 [In Persian].
  16. Fazeli, Nematollah. (2013). Culture and city: cultural rotation in urban discourses. Tehran: Tisa Publications.
  17. Forootan, Manooshehr, Sanaatgar Kakhki, Maryam, Rezaie, Mohammd Kazem. (2013). Method of evaluating environmental vitality in commercial complexes and shopping centers. Journal of Haft Hesar Urban Studies, (6), 65-76 [In Persian].
  18. Gehl, J.(2001 is fifth edition, first published 1971), three types of  Outdoor Activities and Outdoor activities and quality of outdoor space, in Gehl, J.
  19. Ghaffari, Gholamreza. (2007). Social methods and values of Iranian youths, Journal of Studies of Youth, 9(8): 8-32 [In Persian].
  20. Giddens, Anthony (2001). The Consequences of Modernity, Trans: Mohsen Salasi, Tehran: Markaz Publications.
  21. Gifford, R. (1997). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice. Allyn & Bacon press, Boston.
  22. Gifford, Robert. (2018). Research methods for environmental psychology. Trans: Minoo Ghareh Begloo, Mohammad Taghi Pirbabaie, Zahra Ali Nam, Editor: Ghasem Motalebi, Tabriz Art University Press.
  23. Giulianotti, R., Robertson, R.(2012). Glocalization. Blackwell Publishing ltd.
  24. Goodarzi, Saeed (2009). Change in youth values and its related factors, Journal of Social Welfare, (39), 421-444 [In Persian].
  25. Groat, Linda, Wang, David. (2012). Architectural research methods. Trans: Alireza Einifar, Tehran: Tehran University Press. 
  26. Hajiahmadi Hamedani, Azin, Majedi, Hamid, Jahanloo, Laala. (2018). Effective criteria on the formation of women’s image from favorable urban space (Case Study: Tehran City), Journal of Urban Studies, (16), 3-27 [In Persian].
  27. Hebdige, D.(1979).subculture:The Meaning of Style.londan:Methuen Horon Horon, Paul b and Hunt Chesyer, 1987, Sociology.
  28. Herzog, T., Gale, Th. (1996). Preference for Urban building as a function of age and nature context. Environment and Behavior, 1:44-72.
  29. Hossein Abadi, Mahdi (2008). Leisure time of the youth in urban shopping centers (Case Study: Boostan Shopping Center), Journal of Sociological Studies of Youth, (13) [In Persian].
  30. Inglehart, Ronald. (2010). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. Trans: Yaghoub Ahmadi, Tehran: Kavir.
  31. Javanmard, Habibullah, Hosseini, Samaneh. (2013). Determining the relationship between store image, customer satisfaction, behavioral intention, and short distance (Case Study in Shahvand Chain Super Market of Tehran). Journal of Marketing Management, (20), 86-101 [In Persian].
  32. K Kushawaha, T, Ubeja, S, Chatterjee, A. ( 2017). Factor Infuluencing Selection of Shopping Malls: An Exploratory Study of Consumer Perception.SAGE  publications,21(3), 274-283.
  33. Kaplan, S. (1975). An informal model for the prediction of preference. In E. H. Zube, R. O. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross. Pp. 92-101.
  34. Kazemi, Abbas; Rezaei, Mohammad. (2007). Dialectic of differentiation and de-differentiation: roaming and life of urban inferior groups in Tehran shopping centers, Cultural Research Quarterly, (1), 1-24.
  35. Khademi, Shahrzad, Alipour, Sara. (2017). Malls: a modern revelation of public space in Tehran. Journal of Landscape, (40), 42-53 [In Persian].
  36. knox, P. (1987). The social production of the built environment: architect, Architecture
  37. Krizan, F., Bilkova, K., Barlik, P., Kita, P. (2018). Spatial distribution of Consumer Preferences: Case Study of shopping malls In Bratislava. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Mangement, 13,(1),13-21.
  38. Kusumowidagdo, A., Rembulan, C., Sachari, A.  (2015). Sense of  Place among adolescents: Factors influencing The place attachment on shopping malls. Makara Hubs-Asia, 19(2), 97- 106.
  39. Kusumowidagdo, A., Sachari, A., Widodo, P.  (2015). Visitors’ ́ Perception toward   Public space in Shopping Center in the Creation Sense of Place. 5th Arte Polis.
  40. Lang, Jon T. (2017). Creating architectural theory: the role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. Trans: Alireza Einifar, Tehran: Tehran University Press.
  41. Maguire, J. (2008). Hanging Out and the Mall: The Production of a Teenage Social Space. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM.
  42. Matthews, H., Taylor, M., Percy-Smith, B., Limb, M. (2000). The Unacceptable Flaneur: The shopping mall as a teenage Hangout. Center for Children and Youth, University College Northampton,Sage Puolications. 7(3),279-294.
  43. Mohseni, Manoochehr (1994). Study of social, cultural knowledge, attitudes and behaviors in Tehran: Center of Fundamental Researches, Deputy of Fundamental Research, Research Deputy of Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance [In Persian].
  44. Nasar, J L. (1990). The Evaluative Image of City. Journal of the American planning Association, 56(1), 41-53.
  45. Neisser, U. (1977). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
  46. Ogburn, William f, Nimkoff, Mayer F.1940.Sociology.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  47. Oppewal, H., Timmermans, H. (1999). Modeling Consumer perception of public space in shopping centers. Environment and Behavior, 31(1),45-65.
  48. Pyyyry, N., Tani, S. (2016). Young People‘s Play with Urban Public Space: Geographies of Hanging Out. Springer Business Media Singapore, B. Evans et al. (eds), Play and Recreation, Health and Wellbeing, Geographies of Children and Young People.
  49. Razavizadeh E A, Kianersi M. Micro-Components of Functional Quality in the Trade Centers Aiming to Improve Social Interactions. 2019; 9 (20) :59-78 [In Persian].
  50. Rice, F. Philip, 2011, Human development: a life-span approach. Trans: Mahshid Forooghan, Tehran: Arjmand Press.
  51. Robert, M., Vanderbeck, H., James, H. Johanson, Jr. (2000). That’s only place where you can hang out: Urban Young people and the space of The Mall, Urban Geography, 21(1), 5-25.
  52. Ruga, J.P, Nora, Y.(2014). Ethics and Social Value Judgments in Health(2014), Ng N.Y.,and Ruger j. P.Ethic and Social Valuements in Public Health. In: Anthony J. Culyer(ed), Encyclopedia of the Economic, Vol.1. San Diego: Elsevier: 287-291.
  53. Russell, JA., Woard, LM., Prat J. (1981). Affective quality attributed to environments, a factor analytic Study. Environment and behavior. 13(3),259-388.
  54. Sachari, A., Kusumowidagdo, A. (2014). The Sense of Place at Aging shopping centers. International Journal of Research In Social Sciences. 4(6).
  55. Sadeghipour Roudsari, Mahya, Alimohammadi, Parisa, Moazzami, Manoochehr. (2020). Evaluation of physical factors affecting cultural consumption patterns in shopping centers: Palladium, Kourosh, and Tirajeh Shopping Centers in Tehran. Journal of Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Planning, (3), 151-166 [In Persian].
  56. Schafers, Bernhard. (2004). Basics of the sociology of youth. Karamatullah Rasakh. Tehran: Ney Publishing.
  57. Schwartz, S.H(2006). Value orientation: Measurment, antece Schwartz dents and consequences across nations.In R. Jowell, C.Roberts, R.Fitzgerald, & G. Eva(Eds).measuring attitudes cross-nationally lesson from the European Social Survey. London: sage.
  58. Shahabi, Siamak, Rabani, Rasoul (2009). An analysis of the social values of rural youths in Isfahan and the factors affecting them, Urban Regional Studies and Research, Issue 1: 77-106 [In Persian].
  59. Sills, David, I.(1992).international Enecyclopedia of social science.New york, Free Press.
  60. Simmel, G. (1948). the Metropolis and Mental Life. Translated by Edward A. Shils in » Georg Simmel«. edited by Donald N. Levine. University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London., 1971.
  61. Soroor, Houshang, Salahi Sarikhanbigloi, Vahid, Mobaraky, Omid. (2017). Analysis of the role of commercial land uses in urban dynamics and creation of new urban spaces, Case Study: Laleh Park Complex of Tabriz, Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, (15), 29-42 [In Persian].
  62. Storey, John. (2010). Cultural studies and the study of popular culture. Trans: Hossein Payandeh. Tehran: Agah Publication.
  63. Sun, j, wang, x.(2010).differences between generations in China: a study in Shanghai, Journal of Youth Studies, Vol.13, No.1.
  64. Tafakor, Soraya, Shahcheraghi, Azadeh, Habib, Farah. (2019). Comparative study on the architecture of the Tajrish Historical Bazaar and Arg Shopping Center: A Synomorphy Theory Approach, Journal of Architecture Studies of Iran, (16), 105-131 [In Persian].
  65. The emerging Generation Z powerhouse. 3 March 2020; Available from:
  66. Turner, Jonathan H. (1999). Sociology, concepts and uses, Trans: Mohammad Fooladi, Imam Khomeini Research Center Press.
  67. Walsh, w. Bruce(1973).Theories of Person-Environment Interaction for the college Student. Monograph. Lowa city, lowa: American College Testing program(ACT), Research and Development division.
  68. Wicker, Allan W(1972).Processes which mediate behavior-environment congruence.Behavioral Science.17(3):265-277.
  69. Zamani, Bahador, GhalehNoee, Mahmoud, Fazeli, Parisa. (2016). Assessing the publicness of contemporary shopping center, Case Study: City Center Complex of Isfahan, Journal of Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Planning, (23), 185-196 [In Persian].
  70. Zhelnina, A. (2011). It’s Like a museum hear’: The Shopping Mall as Public Space. Summery, Laboratorium, 3(2),132-136.