تبیین مدل ذهنیت تفکر طراحی بر اساس سبک‌های پردازش اطلاعات و تفکر انتقادی با نقش میانجی ویژگی‌های شخصیتی معمار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، گروه معماری، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران.

چکیده
مطالعه شناخت و فرایندهای شناختی و چگونگی پردازش آن‌ها همواره مورد توجه آموزش معماری بوده‌است. تفکر طراحی به منزلۀ سبک شناختی در طراحی است و مهم‌ترین عناصر آن نیز، ذهنیت تفکر طراحی است. این پژوهش، به تبیین ذهنیت تفکر طراحی بر‌اساس سبک‌های پردازش اطلاعات و تفکر انتقادی پرداخته است. از آنجایی که افزایش قدرت طراحی از اهداف مهم آموزش در معماری است، لذا نیاز به شناسایی عوامل مرتبط با روند طراحی و بخصوص عوامل مرتبط با طراح است. روش پژوهش حاضر از نوع همبستگی در قالب مدل معادلات ساختاری بود. جامعه‌ی آماری این پژوهش شامل دانشجویان معماری دانشگاه‌های همدان است که به شیوه در دسترس به تعداد 248 نفر انتخاب شد. جهت جمع‌آوری اطلاعات مربوطه از پرسشنامه‌های ذهنیت تفکر طراحی، سبک‌های پردازش اطلاعات، تفکر انتقادی و ویژگی‌های شخصیتی استفاده شد. داده‌ها با استفاده از مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری تحلیل شدند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد مدل مفهومی تدوین شده با داده‌ها برازش مناسبی داشت؛ به این معنی که بر‌اساس متغیرهای تفکر انتقادی و سبک‌های پردازش اطلاعات با میانجی‌گری ویژگی‌های شخصیتی می‌توان مدل ذهنیت تفکر طراحی را تدوین کرد. ذهنیت تفکر طراحی به نگرش‌ها و باورهای فرد طراح مرتبط است؛ لذا نمی‌تواند بدون تأثیر از ویژگی‌های شخصیتی و توان‌شناختی فرد طراح باشد. بر‌اساس این نتایج ویژگی‌های شخصیتی برون‌گرایی/ درون‌گرایی (تمرکز بر مسئله) و قضاوتی/ ادراکی (جهت‌گیری فرد در مسئله) مستقیم و غیر‌مستقیم بر ذهنیت تفکر طراح اثر گذاشتند و بیشترین میانگین‌ها را نسبت به سایر تیپ‌های شخصیتی داشتند. همچنین سبک‌های پردازش اطلاعات و تفکر انتقادی با ذهنیت تفکر طراحی کاملاً مرتبط بودند. از این‌رو، با تدوین برنامه‌‌هایی جهت آموزش و افزایش قدرت شناختی در دانشجویان معماری، می‌توان انتظار تغییر در ذهنیت تفکر طراحی را در آنان داشت.

تازه های تحقیق

- ذهنیت تفکر طراحی نمی‌تواند بدون تأثیر از ویژگی‌های شخصیتی طراح باشد. ویژگی‌های شخصیتی برون‌گرایی/ درون‌گرایی و قضاوتی/ ادراکی مستقیم و غیرمستقیم بر ذهنیت تفکر طراح اثر گذاشتند و بیشترین میانگین‌ها را نسبت به سایر تیپ‌های شخصیتی داشتند.  
- سبک‌های پردازش اطلاعات و تفکر انتقادی با ذهنیت تفکر طراحی مرتبط بودند. می‌توان با تدوین برنامه‌های آموزش شناختی در جهت توانمندسازی دانشجویان در این زمینه به کمک اساتید اقدام کرد.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Explaining the Design Thinking Mindset Model Based on Information Processing Styles and Critical Thinking with the Mediating Role of Architects’ Personality Traits

نویسنده English

Farhad Karavan
Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Ha.C., Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: The study of cognition, cognitive processes, and how they are processed has always been of interest in architectural education. Design thinking is a cognitive style in design, the main element of which is the design thinking mindset. Mindset is a set of attitudes, opinions, beliefs, and behaviors that characterize a designer and may be related to the designer’s personality traits. Personality encompasses all stable aspects of an individual’s patterns of thinking, emotions, and behavior and is one of the most comprehensive concepts in psychology. Personality is a latent and complex construct associated with a combination of related traits and characteristics. One of these characteristics and abilities is critical thinking, which enables an individual to determine the validity, accuracy, and value of the information to which they are constantly exposed, adapt to different conditions, and think flexibly and critically. Since designers are faced with a large amount of information and stimuli and are required to evaluate and critically assess them in order to make appropriate choices and decisions and use them correctly, they need critical thinking skills. In addition, design thinking also depends on processing ability. The present study aimed to develop a model of the design thinking mindset based on the cognitive constructs of critical thinking and information-processing styles. In other words, it sought to explain the design thinking mindset based on information-processing styles and critical thinking. Since enhancing design ability is one of the important goals of architectural education, it is therefore necessary to identify the factors related to the design process, particularly those related to the designer. On the other hand, the designer’s personality traits were considered as a mediating variable in the relationship between information-processing styles and critical thinking and the design thinking mindset. The study seeks to answer the following main question: How can a model of the design thinking mindset in relation to information-processing styles and critical thinking, with the mediating role of personality traits, be developed while also demonstrating an adequate fit? Furthermore, how are critical thinking and information-processing styles related to the design thinking mindset? And what is the role of personality traits in the relationship between critical thinking and information-processing styles and the design thinking mindset?
Methods: The present research employed a descriptive-correlational method within the framework of structural equation modeling, in which the relationships between two latent exogenous variables (critical thinking and information processing styles), one latent mediating variable (personality traits), and one latent criterion variable (design thinking mindset) were examined. The statistical population of this study included all architecture students at universities in Hamadan who were studying during the 2021–2022 academic year (1400–1401). A sample of 248 students was selected using convenience sampling. To collect the relevant data, questionnaires on design thinking mindset, information processing styles, critical thinking, and personality traits were used. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical measures, including frequency distribution tables, mean, and standard deviation, as well as inferential statistical methods, including the correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling, to test and examine the hypotheses. The analyses were conducted using SPSS 22 and LISREL 8.8.
Findings: The fit index in the present model was 2.37, which was within the acceptable range. The Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI), Incremental Fit Index (IFI), and Comparative Fit Index (CFI) were all above 0.90. The Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) was 0.053 in the present research model, indicating a good fit of the model. Based on these findings, the developed conceptual model showed an adequate fit to the data; meaning that the design thinking mindset model can be developed based on critical thinking and information processing styles, with personality traits as a mediator. The results of the structural relationships in the model showed that the direct effects of the experiential style on the intellectual-emotional trait, the rational style on the sensory-intuitive trait, and critical thinking on the design thinking mindset were not significant (p > 0.05). The remaining direct effects in the model were significant (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: In analyzing and reviewing the theoretical foundations and research findings, it can be stated that since the design thinking mindset is related to the attitudes and beliefs of the individual designer, it cannot be unaffected by the designer’s personality traits and cognitive abilities. Based on these results, the personality traits of extraversion/introversion (focus on the problem) and judging/perceiving (the individual’s orientation toward the problem) had both direct and indirect effects on the designer’s thinking mindset and showed the highest mean scores compared to the other personality types. Furthermore, information processing styles and critical thinking were closely related to the design thinking mindset. Therefore, by developing programs aimed at training and enhancing the cognitive abilities of architecture students, changes in their design thinking mindset can be expected.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Design Thinking
Critical Thinking
Design Thinking Mindset
Information Processing Styles
Architect
Personality Traits
  1. Aktamış, H., & Yenice, N. (2010). Determination of the science process skills and critical thinking skill levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3282–3288.
  2. Avsec, Stanislav; Jagiello-Kowalczyk, Magdalena. (2021). Investigating Possibilities of Developing Self-Directed Learning in Architecture Students Using Design Thinking. Sustainability, 13, 4369.
  3. Beyrami M, hashemi nosrat abad T, bahri sis N. (2018). The relationship between symptoms of paranoid, schizoid and schizotypal personality disorder whit impaired theory of mind. Jmsthums. 6 (2) :48-57. [In Persian]
  4. Both, T. and Baggereor, D. (2010), Bootcamp bootleg, Design School Stanford, Palo Alto.
  5. Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., & Abrell, T. (2016). Design thinking as mindset, process, and toolbox. In Design thinking for innovation (pp. 3-21). Springer, Cham.
  6. Cardillo R, Mammarella IC, Garcia RB, Cornoldi C. (2017). Local and global processing in block design tasks in children with dyslexia or nonverbal learning disability. Research in developmental disabilities; 64: 96-107.
  7. Carlgren, L. (2013). Design thinking as an enabler of innovation: Exploring the concept and its relation to building innovation capabilities, PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology.
  8. Cassidy AR, White MT, DeMaso DR, Newburger JW, Bellinger DC. (2016). Processing speed, executive function, and academic achievement in children with dextro-transposition of the great arteries: Testing a longitudinal developmental cascade model. Neuropsychology; 30 (7): 874.
  9. Davari, Safoora; Bagheri, Masoud and Bani-Asadi, Hassan (2011). Predicting religiosity according to personality dimensions in male and female teachers. Journal of Psychology of Religion, 4(4), 5-26. [In Persian]
  10. Dosi C, Rosati F, Vignoli M. (2018). Measuring Thinking Mindset. International design conference-design.
  11. Ennis, Robert. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Vision. Springer. Topoi 37 (1):165-184.
  12. Epstein, S. & Pacini, R. (1999). Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of Cognitive Experiential Self-theory. In: Chaiken S, Trope Y, editors. Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press; p. 462-82.
  13. Ferguson, S. L. & Hull, D. M. (2018). Personality profiles: Using latent profile analysis to model personality typologies. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 177-183.
  14. Freire C, Ferrads MD, Nٌْez JC, Valle A, Vallejo G. (2019). Eudaimonic well-being and coping with stress in university students: The mediating/moderating role of self-efficacy. International journal of environmental research and public health; 16 (1): 48.
  15. Gadzella BM, Baloglu M. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency of the Student life Stress Inventory. Journal of Instructional Psychology; 28(2):84.
  16. Gordon, H. R. D. (2000). MBTI characteristic of beging trade and industrial and health occupation education secondry teachers. Journal of Health Occupation Education, 14 (1): 9-26.
  17. Gross, K., & Gross, S. (2016). Transformation: Constructivism, design thinking, and elementary STEAM. Art Education, 69(6), 36-43
  18. Hassi, L. & Laakso, M. (2011). “Design Thinking in the Management discourse; defining the elements of the concept”, 18th International Product Development Management Conference, IPDMC.
  19. Hooman, Heydar Ali. (2005). Structural Equation Modeling Using LISREL Software. Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian]
  20. Hunter S, Fears SK, Jones D, Rennie N. (2018). The Impact of Motivation on the Relationship of Academic Stress and Psychological Well-being Among College Students. Gainesville, Brenau University.
  21. Ja.ko K, Czernatowicz-Kukuczka A, Kossowska M, Czarna AZ. (2015). Individual differences in response to uncertainty and decision making: The role of behavioral inhibition system and need for closure. Motivation and Emotion; 39 (4): 541-52.
  22. Kadkhodaei, Mahsa and Foruzandeh, Elham. (2021). Predicting the academic progress of students with academic procrastination in the second year of secondary school in Isfahan based on personality types and time perspective. Quarterly Journal of Educational Research, Year 17, No. 69, 187-210. [In Persian]
  23. Karaman MA, Watson JC. (2017). Examining associations among achievement motivation, locus of control, academic stress, and life satisfaction: A comparison of US and international undergraduate students. Personality and Individual Differences; 111: 106-10.
  24. Karimi, Yousef. (2015). Personality Psychology. Tehran: Editorial Publications. [In Persian]
  25. Lee WK, Kim M. (2019). Latent Profiles of Children’s Relationships with Parents, Teachers, and Peers: Relations with Mental Health, Academic Stress, Academic Motivation, and Academic Achievement. Korean Journal of Child Studies; 40 (3):105-21.
  26. Mohseni, Nik Chehre. (2021). Theories in Developmental Psychology: Cognition, Social Cognition, Cognition and Emotions. Tehran: Jajarmi. [In Persian]
  27. Papageorgiou, E. & Callaghan, C. W. (2018). Personality and adjustment in South African higher education accounting studies. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2-3), 189-204.
  28. Peirce, W. (2005). The Year of Critical Thinking at Prince George's Community College: An Integrated Professional Development Program," in Critical Thinking: Unfinished Business. Ed. Christine McMahon. New Directions for Community Colleges, volume no. 130, pp. 79-85.
  29. Periantalo, J., & Azwar, S. (2017). Pengembangan Skala Kepribadian Siswa SMA Dari Tipologi Kepribadian Jung dan Myers-Briggs. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 91-207.
  30. Poursaberi R, Yaghoobi Beglar N. (2018). The Study of the Role of Myers/Briggs Personality Traits in Predicting Students' Academic Procrastination in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 11 (1) :118-125. [In Persian]
  31. Qing Z, Jing G, Yan W. (2010). Promoting preservice teachers’ critical thinking skills by inquiry-based chemical experiment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences ‚2(2) ‚ 4597-603.
  32. Ricketts, J. C., Rudd, R. D. (2005). Critical Thinking Skills of Selected Youth Leaders: The Efficacy of Critical Thinking Disposition, Leaders and Academic Performance, Journal of Agricultural Education, 46 (1): 32-43.
  33. Rostami C, hosaini S M, yarahmadi Y. (2017). Evaluation of the Relationship between Information Processing Styles and Alexithymia (Case study covered women in Kermanshah Imam Khomeini Relief Foundation). Zanko J Med Sci. 17 (55) :32-45. [In Persian]
  34. Sardjono, Olivia &Yulieta, Megi. (2023). Learning outcomes based on Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality from accounting department students Sam Ratulangi university. Accountability. Volume 12, Number 1, 11-20.
  35. Shirzadifard M. (2012). Information processing styles, perceptions of parent-child relationships and mental well-being: the mediating role of basic beliefs. Master's thesis. Faculty of Psychol Edu Sci of Tehran Unconference, IPDMC.
  36. Shokri O, Farahani M N, Kormi Nouri R, Moradi A. (2014). Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Relationships between Negative Life Events, Academic Stress and Subjective Well-being among Iranian and Swedish University Students. Journal title. 8 (1) :1-10. [In Persian]
  37. Simpson, E., & Courtney, M. (2002). Critical thinking in nursing education: Literature review. International journal of nursing practice, 8(2), 89-98.
  38. Sladek RM, Bond MJ, Phillips PA. (2010). Age and gender differences in preferences for rational and experiential thinking. Personality and Individual Differences ,49 (8).
  39. Smeltzer, S., Bare, B., Brunner, L. & Suddarth, D. (2005). Text Book of Medical Surgical Nursing, 10th Ed. Williams & Wilkins, Lippincott.
  40. Stock, K. L., Bucar, B., & Vokoun, J. (2018). Walking in another’s shoes: Enhancing experiential learning through design thinking. Management Teaching Review, 3(3), 221-228.
  41. Wilt, J., Noftle, E. E., Fleeson, W., & Spain, J. S. (2012). The dynamic role of personality states in mediating the relationship between extraversion and positive affect. Journal of Personality, 80(5), 1205-1236.
  42. Wrigley, C.& Straker, K. (2017). Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 54, 374–385.

مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ
انتشار آنلاین از 31 شهریور 1404

  • تاریخ دریافت 25 دی 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 29 تیر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 11 شهریور 1403